›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 445-448.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

根尖闭合型恒牙完全脱位再植术的临床研究

葛建水1,李小军1,朱晓清1,韩晶晶1,罗昕1,寿燕薇1,汤春波2   

  1. 1. 浙江省杭州市余杭区第三人民医院
    2. 江苏省口腔医院
  • 收稿日期:2014-02-13 修回日期:2014-04-04 出版日期:2015-06-28 发布日期:2015-07-01
  • 通讯作者: 葛建水 E-mail:gekeyi@tom.com

The Clinical Study on replantation in treatment of avulsion of apical closure of permanent teeth

  • Received:2014-02-13 Revised:2014-04-04 Online:2015-06-28 Published:2015-07-01

摘要: [摘要] 目的 研究分析不同固定方式、固定时间和牙髓摘除、根管充填的时机对外伤性根尖闭合型完全脱位牙再植术后愈合方式和远期存留率的影响。方法 收治56位患者83颗外伤性根尖闭合型完全脱位牙再植治疗,随机分为两组:常规治疗组采用传统治疗方法;改良治疗组采用再植后弹性固定2~3周,2周时去髓并用Vitapex(碘仿氢氧化钙糊剂)根充,1月时常规根管充填,随访观察5年,比较两组再植牙术后愈合方式及近、远期存留情况。结果 改良治疗组再植牙术后牙周膜愈合率高于常规治疗组,骨性粘连率与炎症性吸收率低于常规治疗组,有显著性差异(P<0.05);两组再植牙术后1年、2.5年的存留率,改良治疗组略高于常规治疗组,但无显著性差异(P>0.05);5年存留率,改良治疗组(86.50%)优于常规治疗组(67.50%),有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论 对于根尖闭合型完全脱位牙再植术,改良治疗方法可促进再植牙牙周膜愈合,减少牙根吸收的发生,提高远期疗效。[关键词] 完全脱位;再植;固定;根管治疗

关键词: 完全脱位, 再植, 固定, 根管治疗

Abstract: Abstract: Objective To study the healing and long-term retention rate of replantation in treatment of avulsion of apical closure of permanent teeth with different fixing methods, fixing time and pulp remove time , root canal filling time. Methods 56 patients were included and 83 apical closure of permanent teeth avulsion were randomly divided into two groups, the conventional treatment groups using traditional treatment, and the improved groups using replantation and fixing for 2-3 weeks. After 2 weeks, the pulp was removed and root canal was filled with VITAPEX (Cataplasm of iodoform calcium hydroxide).1 months later, it was treated by routine root canal therapy. A following-up study of 5 years was carried out then, and the recent and long-term healing and retention were compared. Results The Periodontal ligament healing rate of improved groups was higher than that of the conventional groups after replantation, while the bone adhesion rate and inflammatory absorption rate were lower and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The retention rate of the improved groups was a little higher than the conventional group after 1 and 2.5 years, but there was no significant difference (P> 0.05).The retention rate of improved groups(86.50%) was higher than the conventional groups (67.50%) after 5 years, and there was a significant difference(P <0.05).Conclusions The improved methods have better clinical effect on improving the Periodontal ligament healing, reducing the root resorption and improving the long-term efficacy than the conventional methods in the replantation to the apical closure of permanent teeth avulsion.

Key words: replantation, fixation, root canal therapy

中图分类号: