上颌侧切牙牙槽骨壁厚度与尖牙关系相关性的锥形束CT研究

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.05.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的利用锥形束CT(cone beam computed tomography,CBCT)研究上颌侧切牙牙槽骨板厚度与尖牙关系之间的相关性,评估影响上颌侧切牙即刻种植位点骨量的相关因素。方法选取49例患者(共92颗上颌侧切牙)的CBCT影像学资料,确定尖牙关系(Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类及Ⅲ类),测量上颌侧切牙牙槽骨的根中颊侧骨板厚度(mid-root buccal width,MBW)、根中腭侧骨板厚度(mid-root palatal width,MPW)、根尖颊侧骨板厚度(apical buccal width,ABW)、根尖腭侧骨板厚度(apical buccal palatal,APW),并对各尖牙关系对应的上颌侧切牙骨板厚度及其分布情况进行统计学分析。结果尖牙Ⅰ类和Ⅲ类关系人群中,上颌侧切牙的MPW(Ⅰ:(2.94±1.20)mm vs. Ⅲ:(1.97±0.69)mm)、ABW(Ⅰ:(1.60±0.55)mm vs. Ⅲ:(2.30±1.03)mm)及APW(Ⅰ:(8.52±1.99)mm vs. Ⅲ:(5.78±1.56)mm)在厚度及厚度分布存在统计学差异(P＜0.05);尖牙Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类人群中,上颌侧切牙的MPW(Ⅰ:(2.94±1.20)mm vs.(2.18±1.10)mm)及APW(Ⅰ:(8.52±1.99)mm vs. Ⅱ:(6.53±2.34)mm)在厚度及厚度分布存在统计学差异(P＜0.05)。结论相较于尖牙Ⅰ类关系人群,尖牙Ⅲ类人群的上颌侧切牙根整体位置及根尖方向更偏腭侧,使得腭侧骨板相对菲薄。即刻种植时,种植体腭侧穿孔风险增加,类似结论在Ⅱ类尖牙关系伴上颌切牙唇倾的患者中也可成立。因此,尖牙Ⅲ类关系及牙齿唇倾可能是上颌切牙区即刻种植修复技术的潜在风险因素。

关键词: 即刻种植, 尖牙关系, 牙槽骨, 锥形束CT

Abstract: Objective To investigate the correlation between the alveolar bone widths of maxillary lateral incisors and canine relationship, and evaluate related factors influencing the alveolar bone morphology of sites for immediate implantation based on cone-beam CT (CBCT). Methods CBCT images of forty-nine patients (a total of 92 maxillary lateral incisors) were selected and canine relationships were determined (Class Ⅰ, Class Ⅱ and Class Ⅲ). The buccal and palatal bone width at both mid-root and apical level (mid-root buccal width/MBW; palatal/MPW; apical buccal width/ABW; palatal/APW) was measured. Then statistical analyses were performed to compare differences of alveolar bone width and their width distribution in three different canine relationships. Results MBW (Ⅰ: (2.94±1.20mm) vs. Ⅲ: (1.97±0.69)mm), ABW (Ⅰ: (1.60±0.55)mm vs. Ⅲ: (2.30±1.03)mm), APW (Ⅰ: (8.52±1.99)mm vs. Ⅲ: (5.78±1.56)mm) along with their distribution in Class Ⅲ canine relationship and MBW (Ⅰ: (2.94±1.20)mm vs. (2.18±1.10)mm), APW (Ⅰ: (8.52±1.99)mm vs. Ⅱ: (6.53±2.34)mm) and their distribution in Class Ⅱ canine relationship were statistically different from Class Ⅰ canine relationship (P＜0.05). Conclusion Compared to Class Ⅰ canine relationship, the root and apex of maxillary lateral incisors with Class Ⅲ relationship are positioned and pointed more towards palatal, which makes the associated palatal alveolar bone relatively thinner and increases the risk of palatal perforation during immediate implantation. Similar conclusions can be drawn from patients with Class Ⅱ canine relationship and proclined upper incisors. Therefore, Class Ⅲ canine relationship and tooth proclination can be potential risk factors for immediate implantation at maxillary incisors.

Key words: immediate implantation, canine relationship, alveolar bone, cone-beam CT

中图分类号:

R783.4

雷晨, 于群, Khulood Ali ALTAEZI, 汤春波. 上颌侧切牙牙槽骨壁厚度与尖牙关系相关性的锥形束CT研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2022, 42(5): 425-430.

LEI Chen, YU Qun, Khulood Ali ALTAEZI, TANG Chunbo. Cone-beam CT analysis of the correlation between the alveolar bone widths of maxillary lateral incisors and canine relationship[J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(5): 425-430.

参考文献

[1] Xie Y, Li SH, Zhang TX, et al. Titanium mesh for bone augmentation in oral implantology: Current application and progress[J]. Int J Oral Sci, 2020, 12(1):37.
[2] Arora H, Khzam N, Roberts D,et al. Immediate implant place-ment and restoration in the anterior maxilla: Tissue dimensional changes after 2-5 year follow up[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017, 19(4):694-702.
[3] Arora H, Ivanovski S. Correlation between pre-operative buccal bone thickness and soft tissue changes around immediately placed and restored implants in the maxillary anterior region: A 2-year prospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(10):1188-1194.
[4] Lang NP, Pun L, Lau KY,et al. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012, 23(Suppl 5):39-66.
[5] Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC,et al. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: When immediate, when early, when late? [J]. Periodontol 2000, 2017, 73(1):84-102.
[6] Chen ST, Darby I. The relationship between facial bone wall defects and dimensional alterations of the ridge following flapless tooth extraction in the anterior maxilla[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(8):931-937.
[7] Zhang WJ, Skrypczak A, Weltman R. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2015, 15: 65.
[8] Hu XN, Huang XY, Gu Y. Assessment of buccal and lingual alveolar bone thickness and buccolingual inclination of maxillary posterior teeth in patients with severe skeletal ClassⅢ malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2020, 157(4):503-515.
[9] Shrestha R, Liu X, Chen SC,et al. Correlation of anterior overbite with root position and buccal bone thickness of maxillary anterior teeth: A CBCT study[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2019, 41(8):935-942.
[10] Bell RA, Dean JA, McDonald RE, et al. Management of the developing occlusion[M]. 9th ed. Maryland Heights: Mosby Elsevier, 2011: 550-613.
[11] Kumar D, Gurunathan D. Primary canine and molar relationships in centric occlusion in 3- to 6-year-old children: A cross-sectional survey[J]. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2019, 12(3):201-204.
[12] Lau SL, Chow J, Li W,et al. Classification of maxillary central incisors-implications for immediate implant in the esthetic zone[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69(1):142-153.
[13] Tsigarida A, Toscano J, de Brito Bezerra B,et al. Buccal bone thickness of maxillary anterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2020, 47(11):1326-1343.
[14] Sendyk M,de Paiva JB, Abrão J, et al. Correlation between buccolingual tooth inclination and alveolar bone thickness in subjects with Class Ⅲ dentofacial deformities[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 2017, 152(1):66-79.
[15] Do TA, Shen YW, Fuh LJ,et al. Clinical assessment of the palatal alveolar bone thickness and its correlation with the buccolingual angulation of maxillary incisors for immediate implant placement[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019, 21(5):1080-1086.
[16] Tian YL, Liu F, Sun HJ,et al. Alveolar bone thickness around maxillary central incisors of different inclination assessed with cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2015, 45(5):245-252.
[17] Conley RS, Edwards SP. Three-dimensional treatment planning for maxillary and mandibular segmental surgery for an adult ClassⅢ: Where old meets new[J]. Angle Orthod, 2019, 89(1):138-148.
[18] Chen WT, Zhang KL, Liu DX. Palatal bone thickness at the implantation area of maxillary skeletal expander in adult patients with skeletal ClassⅢ malocclusion: A cone-beam computed tomography study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2021, 21(1):144.
[19] Ma HM, Li WR, Xu L,et al. Morphometric evaluation of the alveolar bone around central incisors during surgical orthodontic treatment of high-angle skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2021, 24(1):87-95.
[20] Wang HM, Shen JW, Yu MF,et al. Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone: A retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29(5):1123-1129.
[21] Jung YH, Cho BH, Hwang JJ. Analysis of the root position of the maxillary incisors in the alveolar bone using cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Imaging Sci Dent, 2017, 47(3):181-187.
[22] Mohamed Kassim ZH, Abdul Hamid AL, Ghazali N,et al. A rehabilitation of missing maxillary anterior teeth in a severe skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion patient requiring implants[J]. Ann Dent, 2021, 28: 8-14.