Er:YAG激光桩道预处理的研究进展

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.05.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文回顾了Er:YAG激光活化根管冲洗技术的最新研究进展,包括光子诱导光声流(photon initiated photoacoustic streaming,PIPS)技术和冲击波增强发射光声流(shock wave enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming,SWEEPS)技术,探讨Er:YAG激光预处理桩道的原理、优点以及对纤维桩粘接强度的影响,以期为临床选择适宜的桩道处理方法提供新思路。

关键词: Er:YAG激光, 光子诱导光声流, 冲击波增强发射光声流, 桩道预处理, 纤维桩粘接强度

Abstract: This article reviewed the latest research progress of Er:YAG laser activated root canal irrigation technology, including photon initiated photoacoustic streaming(PIPS) technology and shock wave enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) technology. The principle and advantages of Er:YAG laser post space pretreatment and its′ influence on the bonding strength of fiber post were discussed, in order to provide new ideas for selecting appropriate methods of post space pretreatment in clinical practice.

Key words: Er:YAG laser, photon initiated photoacoustic streaming, shock wave enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming, pretreatment of post space, bond strength of fiber post

中图分类号:

R783.1

冯帆, 刘夏青, 李雅丹, 刘贺楠, 乔煜轩, 李英. Er:YAG激光桩道预处理的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学, 2022, 42(5): 467-470.

FENG Fan, LIU Xiaqing, LI Yadan, LIU Henan, QIAO Yuxuan, LI Ying. Research progress of Er: YAG laser pretreatment methods of post space[J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(5): 467-470.

参考文献

[1] Naumann M, Reich S, Nothdurft FP,et al. Survival of glass fiber post restorations over 5 years[J]. Am J Dent, 2008, 21(4):267-272.
[2] Thanatvarakorn O, Prasansuttiporn T, Thittaweerat S,et al. Smear layer-deproteinizing improves bonding of one-step self-etch adhesives to dentin[J]. Dent Mater, 2017, 34(3):434-441.
[3] Mirseifinejad R, Tabrizizadeh M, Davari A, et al. Efficacy of different root canal irrigants on smear layer removal after post space preparation: A scanning electron microscopy evaluation[J]. Iran Endod J, 2017, 12(2):185-190.
[4] Su Z, Li Z, Shen Y, et al. Characteristics of the irrigant flow in a simulated lateral canal under two typical laser-activated irrigation regimens[J].Lasers Surg Med,2020,53(4):587-594.
[5] 关卿, 王晓丽, 何文喜. 激光活化荡洗在根管治疗中的作用[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2018, 11(11):650-654.
[6] George R, Meyers IA, Walsh LJ. Laser activation of endodontic irrigants with improved conical laser fiber tips for removing smear layer in the apical third of the root canal[J]. J Endod, 2008, 34(12):1524-1527.
[7] 何睿莹, 唐旭炎. Er, Cr: YSGG激光联合不同冲洗剂预处理离体牙桩道对纤维桩粘接强度的影响[J]. 山东医药, 2021, 61(8):32-36.
[8] Peters OA, Bardsley S, Fong J, et al. Disinfection of root canals with photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming[J].J Endod, 2011, 37(7):1008-1012.
[9] Pedullà E, Genovese C, Campagna E, et al. Decontamination efficacy of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) of irrigants using low-energy laser settings: An ex vivo study[J].Int Endod J, 2012, 45(9):865-870.
[10] Do QL, Gaudin A.The Efficiency of the Er:YAG laser and photon- induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) as an activation method in endodontic irrigation: A literature review[J].J Lasers Med Sci, 2020, 11(3):316-331.
[11] 孙宁佳,郭威.Er:YAG激光和超声荡洗对根管内壁形态及微渗漏的比较研究[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2017,27(12):689-697.
[12] 刘畅, 刘红, 杨春英. 6种冲洗剂组合对桩道内壁超微结构的影响[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2010, 26(5):650-654.
[13] Takeda FH, Harashima T, Kimura Y, et al. Comparative study about the removal of smear layer by three types of laser devices[J]. J Clin Laser Med Surg, 1998, 16(2):117-122.
[14] Arslan D, Guneser MB, Dincer AN, et al.Comparison of smear layer removal ability of QMix with different activation techniques[J].J Endod, 2016, 42(8):1279-1285.
[15] Thapak G, Arya A, Grewal MS, et al. A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal using erbium:YAG laser-activated irrigation, sonic irrigation, and manual dynamic irrigation: A scanning electron microscope study[J].J Lasers Med Sci, 2021, 12(1):e22.
[16] Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling JQ, et al. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices[J]. J Endod, 2009, 35(6):791-804.
[17] Malki M, Verhaagen B, Jiang LM, et al. Irrigant flow beyond the insertion depth of an ultrasonically oscillating file in straight and curved root canals: visualization and cleaning efficacy[J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(5):657-661.
[18] Jiang LM, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, et al. Evaluation of a sonic device designed to activate irrigant in the root canal[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(1):143-146.
[19] Kamaci A, Aydin B, Erdilek N. The effect of ultrasonically activated irrigation and laser based root canal irrigation methods on debris removal[J]. Int J Artif Organs, 2017, 41(2):41-45.
[20] Lloyd A, Uhles JP, Clement DJ, et al. Elimination of intracanal tissue and debris through a novel laser-activated system assessed using high-resolution micro-computed tomography: A pilot study[J].J Endod, 2014, 40(4):584-587.
[21] Groot SDD, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, et al. Laser-activated irrigation within root canals: Cleaning efficacy and flow visualization[J]. Int Endod J, 2010, 42(12):1077-1083.
[22] Moor R, Meire M, Goharkhay K, et al.Efficacy of ultrasonic versus laser-activated irrigation to remove artificially placed dentin debris plugs[J].J Endod, 2010, 36(9):1580-1583.
[23] Arslan H, Capar ID, Saygili G, et al. Effect of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming on removal of apically placed dentinal debris[J]. Int Endod J, 2014, 47(11):1072-1077.
[24] Arslan H, Ylmaz CB, Karatas E, et al.Efficacy of different treatments of root canal walls on the pull-out bond strength of the fiber posts[J].Lasers Med Sci, 2015, 30(2):863-868.
[25] 常颖, 王学玲, 王维丽, 等. 桩道牙本质壁的不同处理对纤维桩粘接强度的影响[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2015, 16(3):169-173.
[26] 李进红, 金冬梅, 王素. 不同参数激光处理根管对纤维桩粘结强度影响的实验研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(1):102-105.
[27] 万书, 谭裕洁, 解静, 等. 不同桩道预处理对玻璃纤维桩粘接强度的影响[J]. 西南医科大学学报, 2020, 43(5):433-438.
[28] Lukač N, Jezeršek M. Amplification of pressure waves in laser-assisted endodontics with synchronized delivery of Er: YAG laser pulses[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2018, 33(4):823-833.
[29] Ohl CD, Arora M, Dijkink R, et al.Surface cleaning from laser-induced cavitation bubbles[J].Appl Phys Lett, 2006, 89(7):074102-074102-3.
[30] De Icaza-Herrera M, Fernández, Francisco, et al.Combined short and long-delay tandem shock waves to improve shock wave lithotripsy according to the Gilmore-Akulichev theory.[J].Ultrasonics, 2015, 58:53-59.
[31] Gregori P, Petkovek R, Moina J, et al.Measurements of cavitation bubble dynamics based on beam-deflection probe[J].Appl Phys A, 2008, 93(4):901-905.
[32] 王晓娜, 石晶. 新型饵激光与超声对根管荡洗作用的对比研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2021, 41(4):328-332.
[33] Jezeršek M, Jereb T, Lukač N, et al. Evaluation of apical extrusion during novel Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation modality[J].Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg,2019,37(9), 544-550.
[34] Jezeršek M, Lukač N, Lukač M. Measurement of simulated debris removal rates in an artificial root canal to optimize laser-activated irrigation parameters[J].Lasers Surg Med,2021,53(3):411-417.
[35] Kosarieh E, Bolhari B, Pirayvatlou SS, et al. Effect of Er: YAG laser irradiation using SWEEPS and PIPS technique on dye penetration depth after root canal preparation[J].Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2020, 33(3):102136.
[36] 林欣欣. 采用铒激光荡洗技术清理根管玷污层的体外研究[D].北京:中国医学科学院北京协和医学院,2019.
[37] Arcolu B, Kman AA, Babacan M. Thecomparison of cleaning efficacy and apical extrusion of advanced irrigation activationmethodswith a novel Er:YAG laser modality: sweeps[J].Lasers Dent Sci, 2021, 5(1):43-52.