二氧化钛纳米管对兔胫骨内种植体旋转扭力的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　通过兔子动物模型评估种植体表面不同管径的TIO2纳米管对成骨细胞黏附、种植体扭力和成骨基因表达的影响。方法　将24个订做的螺旋状的长为6 mm，外径为2.5 mm的纯钛种植体分为3组。A组：对照组平滑面种植体；B组：表面为30 nm管径TiO2纳米管的种植体；C组：表面为70 nm管径TiO2纳米管的种植体。分别将种植体植入兔子胫骨，手术后四周，处死兔子，采用数字扭力仪通过反向旋转取下腿部种植体，测量种植体扭力，通过扫描电子显微镜分析种植体表面成骨细胞的粘附，通过实时PCR检测核心结合因子（Runx2）、胰岛素样生长因子（IGF）、I型胶原（col1）和骨钙素（OCN）的基因表达水平。结果　表面为70 nm管径TiO2纳米管的种植体可以增强兔胫骨内种植体的扭力（P＜0.05），并显著性的提高Runx2、IGF、col1和 OCN等成骨基因的表达水平（P＜0.05）。结论　相对于30 nm管径纳米管，表面为70 nm管径纳米管的种植体可以获得良好的成骨反应，并且在早期植入期具有较高的界面强度。

关键词: 纳米管, 扭力, 成骨细胞, 成骨基因, 兔

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the removal torque, osteoblast adhesion and gene expression of different TiO2 nanotubes implant with the rabbit model. Methods A total of 24 custom-made, screw-shaped, commercially pure titanium implants with length of 6 mm and an outer diameter of 2.5 mm were divided into 3 groups. Group A: the control implant is machined. Group B: eight implants anodized with 30 nm nanotubes. Group C: eight implants anodized with 70 nm nanotubes. Four weeks after the surgery, the rabbits were sacrificed. Subsequently, the leg was stabilized and the implant was removed under reverse torque rotation with a digital torque gauge. Osteoblast adhesion was analyzed with scanning electron microscope. The gene expression of Runt-related transcription factor2 (Runx2)、Insulinlike growth factors (IGF)、collagen-I (col-1) and osteocalcin (OCN) were examined by using real-time PCR. Results The results showed that implants anodized with 70 nm nanotubes could enhance removal torque in rabbit tibia and significantly improve the Runx2、IGF、col-1 and OCN gene expression level(P<0.05). Conclusions The implants with large diameter nantubes achieved favorable osteoblast response and a higher interfacial strength at an early implantation period compared with the machined titanium implants and small diameter nantube implants.

Key words: nanotubes, removal torque, osteoblast, bone gene, rabbit

中图分类号:

R783.1

徐玲于卫强. 二氧化钛纳米管对兔胫骨内种植体旋转扭力的影响[J]. , 2016, 36(1): 25-29.

参考文献

[1]Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, et al. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration[J]. Dent Mater,2007,23(7): 844-854.
[2]Popat KC, Leoni L, Grimes CA, et al. Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells[J]. Biomaterials,2007, 28(21): 3188-3197.
[3] Wang N, Li H, Lü W, et al. Effects of TiO2 nanotubes with different diameters on gene expression and osseointegration of implants in minipigs[J]. Biomaterials,2011, 32(29):6900-6911.
[4] Johansson, C. Albrektsson, T. Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: A 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 1987;2:69 –75.
[5] Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Dean DD, et al. The role of implants surface characteristics in the healing of bone [J]. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996;7(4):329–45.
[6] Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response [J]. Biomaterials 1996; 17:137–46.
[7] Brunette DM. The effects of implant surface topography on the behavior of cells [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;3:231–46.
[8] Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, et al. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium imlants, a histomorphometric study in miniature pigs [J]. J Biomech Mater Res 1991;25:889–902.
[9] Yao C, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ. Enhanced osteoblast functions on anodized titanium with nanotube-like structures[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2008,85(1):157-166.
[10] Park J, Bauer S, von der Mark K, et al. Nanosize and Vitality: TiO2 Nanotube Diameter Directs Cell Fate[J]. Nano Letters, 2007,7(6): 1686-1691.
[11] Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, et al. Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;91:195e208.
[12] Shekaran A, Garcia AJ. Nanoscale engineering of extracellular matrix-mimetic bioadhesive surfaces and implants for tissue engineering [J]. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011;1810:350e60.
[13]Yu W, Jiang X, Zhang F, Xu L, et al. The effect of anatase TiO2 nanotube layers on MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation [J]. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;94:1012e22.
[14] Bjursten LM, Rasmusson L, Oh S, et al. Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo [J]. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;92:1218e24.
[15] McConnell D. The crystal structure of bone [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1962;23: 253e68.
[16] Landis WJ, Hodgens KJ, Arena J, et al. Structural relations between collagen and mineral in bone as determined by high voltage electron microscopic tomography [J]. Microsc Res Technol 1996;33:192e202
[17] McConnell D. The crystal structure of bone [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1962;23: 253e68.
[18] Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, et al. Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage [J]. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;91:195e208.
[19] Shekaran A, Garcia AJ. Nanoscale engineering of extracellular matrix-mimetic bioadhesive surfaces and implants for tissue engineering [J]. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011;1810:350e60.