›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 1078-1082.

• 基础研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

Mtwo镍钛器械分离的器械相关性研究

王南南1,张栋华2,牟永斌1,葛久禹1   

  1. 1. 南京大学医学院附属口腔医院
    2. 南京医科大学附属口腔医院
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-31 修回日期:2016-08-14 出版日期:2016-12-28 发布日期:2016-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 王南南 E-mail:skqkjk@163.com

Correlation study of defects in Mtwo instruments after clinical use

  • Received:2016-05-31 Revised:2016-08-14 Online:2016-12-28 Published:2016-12-20

摘要: 目的 观察临床中废弃的Mtwo镍钛分离器械特点,分析影响Mtwo镍钛器械分离的器械因素。 方法 随机选取南京大学医学院附属口腔医院2013年3月至2014年1月临床中废弃的部分Mtwo镍钛器械,共计419支镍钛器械。在30倍显微镜下观察镍钛器械尖端、刃部和螺纹形态,将废弃器械分为完整组、变形组和分离组。对于变形组和分离组器械进行扫描电子显微镜观察,分析器械分离类型。 结果 临床废弃器械中,63.5% Mtwo镍钛器械表面出现不同程度的变形、缺损。分离器械占21.2%。4种不同型号的Mtwo器械分离率分别为#10.04:31.6%,#15.05:13.8%,#20.06:21.0%,#25.06:17.7%,其中#10.04 Mtwo镍钛器械分离率最高。63.8% #15.05 Mtwo镍钛器械发生不同程度的变形。分离器械中,82.0%器械为疲劳分离。超扭矩分离主要发生于#10.04器械。扫描电子显微镜显示,在疲劳分离中,器械表面有疲劳条带出现,而在超扭矩分离中,分离断面主要是陷窝状断裂和微孔隙出现。 结论 Mtwo镍钛器械分离主要为疲劳分离。疲劳分离机制和超扭矩分离机制在不同型号分离器械中所占比例不同。而不同分离机制导致的分离器械表面性状具有不同的改变。

关键词: Mtwo镍钛器械, 器械分离, 疲劳分离, 超扭矩分离

Abstract: Objective To observe and analyze defects in Mtwo instruments after clinical use. Methods A total of 419 Mtwo instruments after clinical use were collected at Nanjing Stomatology Hospital from March 2013 to January 2014. The instruments were examined under a stereomicroscope at 30× magnification. The instruments were divided into three groups:① without defects, intact; ② with defects; ③ fractured or separated. A scanning electron microscope was used to examine some typical changes of the fractured instruments to analyze the separation types. Results 63.5% of the Mtwo instruments showed defects. The incidence of instrument separation was 21.2%. The incidences of instrument separation of four types of Mtwo instruments were respectively #10.04:31.6%,#15.05:13.8%,#20.06:21.0%,#25.06:17.7%. #10.04 was the most frequently fractured instrument (31.6%). Deformations were mostly observed in #15.05 instruments. Cyclic fatigue was the main mechanism for instrument separation of Mtwo. Torsional fracture was observed mostly in #10.04 instruments. According to the SEM, fatigue striations were observed in the instruments fractured because of cyclic fatigue. Dimpled rupture and microvoids could be found in the instruments as a result of torsional stress. Conclusion Cyclic fatigue seems to be an important mechanism for instrument separation of Mtwo rotary instruments. Its proportion in instrument separation is different from that of torsional stress. The rotary file size is correlated with the incidence and mechanism of instrument separation.

Key words: Mtwo instruments, instrument separation, cyclic fatigue, torsional stress

中图分类号: