›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 823-825.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

2种酸蚀方法在窝沟釉质成形封闭术中的临床应用观察

许姚1,万宏坤1,2,沈海燕1,2   

  1. 1. 江苏省如东县中医院
    2.
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-11 修回日期:2017-02-23 出版日期:2017-09-28 发布日期:2017-09-22
  • 通讯作者: 许姚 E-mail:jskqxy@163.com

Clinical application of two etching adhesivein enameloplasty sealant technique

  • Received:2017-01-11 Revised:2017-02-23 Online:2017-09-28 Published:2017-09-22

摘要: 目的 比较磷酸酸蚀和自酸蚀应用于釉质成形术预防窝沟龋的临床疗效。方法 根据适应证选择100例8岁小学生400颗第一恒磨牙,采用自身半口对照方法,窝沟釉质成形术后左侧(试验组)自酸蚀后涂布封闭剂,右侧(对照组)磷酸酸蚀后涂布封闭剂。术后跟踪随访6、12和24个月观察封闭剂保留率。结果 2组6、12和24个月封闭剂保留率相近,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 两种酸蚀方法用于窝沟釉质成形封闭术均能取得满意效果。

关键词: 窝沟釉质成形术, 磷酸酸蚀, 自酸蚀, 封闭剂保留率

Abstract: Objective Through a 2year followup study on the effect of the two enameloplasty sealant techniques, to compare the efficacy of the application of phosphate etching and selfetching on preventing the caries of pit and fissure. Methods With splitmouth comparison,100 children aged 8 were selected to study, which means 400 first permanent molars were involved. After the enameloplasty, the left teeth of the mouth were selfetched (experimental group),and the right ones were phosphate etched (control group). The retention rates of sealing agent at 6 months,12 months and 24months were followed up. Results There were no significant differences between the phosphate etching and selfetching adhesive in the retention rate of sealing agent at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months(P>0.05). Conclusions The effect of the two etching adhesives in enameloplasty sealant technique is satisfying.

Key words: enameloplasty sealant technique, phosphate etching, selfetching, the retention rate of sealing agent

中图分类号: