1. Chang, C.J., T.M. Lee, and J.K. Liu, Effect of bracket bevel design and oral environmental factors on frictional resistance[J]. Angle Orthod, 2013. 83(6): p. 956-65.DOI: 10.2319/101612-808.12. Dalstra, M., et al., Actual versus theoretical torsional play in conventional and self-ligating bracket systems[J]. J Orthod, 2015. 42(2): p. 103-13.DOI: 10.1179/1465313314Y.00000001263. Katsikogianni, E.N., et al., A comparative experimental investigation of torque capabilities induced by conventional and active, passive self-ligating brackets[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2015. 37(4): p. 440-6.DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cju0674. Knosel, M., et al., On the interaction between incisor crown-root morphology and third-order angulation[J]. Angle Orthod, 2009. 79(3): p. 454-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-007-0635-z5. Geiger, A.M. and B.H. Wasserman, Relationship of occlusion and periodontal disease: part IX-incisor inclination and periodontal status[J]. Angle Orthod, 1976. 46(2): p. 99-110. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1976)046<0099:ROOAPD>2.0.CO;26. Perrey, W., et al., Effect of archwire qualities and bracket designs on the force systems during leveling of malaligned teeth. J Orofac Orthop, 2015. 76(2): p. 129-38, 140-2.7. Sepolia, S., et al., Retrospective Analysis of Different Bracket Systems used in the Treatment of Patients with Anterior Crowding: A Longitudinal Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2016. 17(8): p. 687-91.8. Kaygisiz, E., et al., Effects of self-ligating and conventional brackets on halitosis and periodontal conditions. Angle Orthod, 2015. 85(3): p. 468-73.9. Chen, W., A.A. Haq, and Y. Zhou, Root resorption of self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets in severe anterior crowding Class I patients: a longitudinal retrospective study. BMC Oral Health, 2015. 15: p. 115.10. Pandis, N., et al., Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011. 140(3): p. e99-e105.11. Zawawi, K.H. and M.S. Al-Zahrani, Gingival biotype in relation to incisors' inclination and position[J]. Saudi Med J, 2014. 35(11): p. 1378-83.12. Lapatki, B.G., et al., Lip-to-incisor relationship and postorthodontic long-term stability of cover-bite treatment[J]. Angle Orthod, 2006. 76(6): p. 942-9.DOI: 10.2319/090205-30913. Franco, E.M., et al., Comparative study of torque expression among active and passive self-ligating and conventional brackets[J]. Dental Press J Orthod, 2015. 20(6): p. 68-74.DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.20.6.068-074.oar14. Pandis, N., S. Strigou, and T. Eliades, Maxillary incisor torque with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a prospective clinical trial[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2006. 9(4): p. 193-8.DOI:10.1111/j.1601-6343.2006.00375.x15. Songra, G., et al., Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2014. 145(5): p. 569-78.16. Szczupakowski, A., et al., Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems. J Orofac Orthop, 2016. 77(4): p. 287-95.17. Scott, P., et al., Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008. 134(4): p. 470.e1-8.18. O'Dywer, L., et al., A multi-center randomized controlled trial to compare a self-ligating bracket with a conventional bracket in a UK population: Part 1: Treatment efficiency. Angle Orthod, 2016. 86(1): p. 142-8.19. O'Brien, K., Longer treatment times with self-ligated orthodontic brackets. Evid Based Dent, 2014. |