初始黏膜厚度对种植体边缘骨吸收影响的研究进展

摘要/Abstract

摘要： ［摘要］稳定的颈部边缘骨水平是种植体长期成功的一个重要指标,而黏膜厚度作为一个影响种植体边缘骨吸收(marginal bone loss, MBL)的因素一直被研究和讨论。大多数的临床研究和动物实验表明，相对于薄黏膜(≤2 mm)，厚黏膜（＞2 mm）区域的种植体颈部MBL更少。基于推测黏膜厚度影响重建种植体生物学宽度(biologic width，BW)从而影响种植体MBL，学者们根据缺牙区初始的黏膜厚度，尝试调整临床种植操作。有学者增加黏膜厚度达到了减少种植体MBL的目的，也有学者根据黏膜厚度调节种植深度达到了避免种植体表面早期暴露的目的。本文就初始黏膜厚度对种植体颈部MBL影响和对临床种植参考意义的相关研究进展综述如下。

关键词: 初始粘膜厚度, 边缘骨吸收, 生物学宽度, 种植

Abstract: The stability of marginal bone level is an important indicator of long-term success of implants. The mucosal thickness has been studied and discussed as a factor influencing the implant marginal bone loss (MBL). Most clinical and animal studies have demonstrated that there is less implant MBL in the thick mucosa (>2mm) than in the thin mucosa (≤2mm). Based on the speculation that mucosal thickness would be involved in the reconstruction of implant biologic width (BW), thereby affecting implant MBL, the researchers try to adjust clinical implantation procedures according to the initial mucosal thickness. Some scholars have achieved the goal of reducing implant MBL by increasing the thickness of the mucosa, while others have achieved the goal of avoiding early exposure of the implant surface by adjusting the implant depth according to the thickness of the mucosa. The research progress of the effect of initial mucosal thickness on MBL around the neck of implant and its significance for clinical implantation is reviewed as follows in this paper.

Key words: initial mucosal thickness , Marginal bone loss, biologic width , Dental implants

中图分类号:

　R782.13

罗昕冯宜何福明. 初始黏膜厚度对种植体边缘骨吸收影响的研究进展[J]. , 2019, 39(8): 744-747.

参考文献 32

[1]	Prasad DK, Shetty M, Bansal N, et al.Crestal bone preservation: a review of different approaches for successful implant therapy[J].Indian J Dent Res, 2011, 22(2):317-323
[2]	H?mmerle CHF, Tarnow D.The etiology of hard- and soft-tissue deficiencies at dental implants: A narrative review[J].J Periodontol, 2018, 89(Suppl 1):S291-S303
[3]	Galindo-Moreno P, León-Cano A, Monje A, et al.Abutment height influences the effect of platform switching on peri-implant marginal bone loss[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016, 27(2):167-173
[4]	Vervaeke S, Collaert B, Cosyn J, et al.A 9-Year prospective case series using multivariate analyses to identify predictors of early and late peri-implant bone loss[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2016, 18:30-39.
[5]	Puisys A, Linkevicius T.The influence of mucosal tissue thickening on crestal bone stability around bone-level implants. A prospective controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26:123-129.
[6]	Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, et al.Crestal bone stability around implants with horizontally matching connection after soft tissue thickening: a prospective clinical trial[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17:497-508.
[7]	Bhat PR, Thakur SL, Kulkarni SS.The influence of soft tissue biotype on the marginal bone changes around dental implants: A 1-year prospective clinico-radiological study[J].Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 2015, 19:640-644.
[8]	Linkevicius T, Linkevicius R, Alkimavicius J, et al.Influence of titanium base, lithium disilicate restoration and vertical soft tissue thickness on bone stability around triangular-shaped implants: A prospective clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29:716-724.
[9]	Vervaeke S, Matthys C, Nassar R, et al.Adapting the vertical position of implants with a conical connection in relation to soft tissue thickness prevents early implant surface exposure: A 2-year prospective intra-subject comparison[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2018, 45:605-612.
[10]	Garguilo A W, Wentz F M, Orban B.Dimensions and Relations of the dentogingival junction in humans[J]. J Periodontol, 1961, 32:261-267.
[11]	Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, et al.The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 1991, 2:81-90.
[12]	Berglundh T, Lindhe J.Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 1996, 23:971-973.
[13]	Araujo MG, Lindhe J.Peri-implant health[J]. J Periodontol, 2018, 89 Suppl 1:S249-S56.
[14]	Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al.Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface[J]. J Dent Res, 2006, 85:473-478.
[15]	Strietzel FP, Neumann K, Hertel M.Impact of platform switching on marginal peri-implant bone-level changes. A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26:342-358.
[16]	Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Cristalli MP, et al.Peri-implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2012, 39:1097-1113.
[17]	Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, et al.Influence of thin mucosal tissues on crestal bone stability around implants with platform switching: a 1-year pilot study[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 68:2272-2277.
[18]	Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Svediene O, et al.Radiological comparison of laser-microtextured and platform-switched implants in thin mucosal biotype[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26:599-605.
[19]	Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Steigmann M, et al.Influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants with platform switching: a comparative clinical study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17:1228-1236.
[20]	Novoa L, Batalla P, Caneiro L, et al.Influence of abutment height on maintenance of peri-implant crestal bone at bone-level implants: a 3-year follow-up study[J].Int J PeriodonticsRestor Dent, 2017, 37:721-7.
[21]	Vervaeke S, Dierens M, Besseler J, et al.The influence of initial soft tissue thickness on peri-implant bone remodeling[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2014, 16:238-247.
[22]	van Eekeren P, van Elsas P, Tahmaseb A, et al.The influence of initial mucosal thickness on crestal bone change in similar macrogeometrical implants: a prospective randomized clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28:214-248.
[23]	Suarez-Lopez Del Amo F, Lin GH, Monje A, et al.Influence of soft tissue thickness on peri-implant marginal bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Periodontol, 2016, 87:690-699.
[24]	Galindo-Moreno P, Leon-Cano A, Ortega-Oller I, et al.Prosthetic abutment height is a key factor in peri-implant marginal bone loss [J]. J Dent Res, 2014, 93:80S-5S.
[25]	Bengazi F, Lang NP, Caroprese M, et al.Dimensional changes in soft tissues around dental implants following free gingival grafting: an experimental study in dogs[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26:176-182.
[26]	Zafiropoulos GG, Deli G, Hoffmann O, et al.Changes of the peri-implant soft tissue thickness after grafting with a collagen matrix[J]. J Indian Soc Periodontol, 2016, 20:441-445.
[27]	Puisys A, Vindasiute E, Linkevciene L, et al.The use of acellular dermal matrix membrane for vertical soft tissue augmentation during submerged implant placement: a case series[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26:465-670.
[28]	Hehn J, Schwenk T, Striegel M, et al.The effect of PRF (platelet-rich fibrin) inserted with a split-flap technique on soft tissue thickening and initial marginal bone loss around implants: results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial[J].Int J Implant Dent, 2016, 2:13.
[29]	Gatti C, Gatti F, Silvestri M, et al.A Prospective multicenter study on radiographic crestal bone changes around dental implants placed at crestal or subcrestal level: one-year findings[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2018, 33:913-918.
[30]	Schwarz F, Mihatovic I, Golubovich V, et al.Impact of abutment microstructure and insertion depth on crestal bone changes at nonsubmerged titanium implants with platform switch[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26:287-292.
[31]	Cochran DL, Mau LP, Higginbottom FL, et al.Soft and hard tissue histologic dimensions around dental implants in the canine restored with smaller-diameter abutments: a paradigm shift in peri-implant biology[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2013, 28:494-502.
[32]	Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, et al.The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24:712-9.