不同材料嵌体修复对楔状缺损患牙应力分布影响的三维有限元分析

›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 31-34.

不同材料嵌体修复对楔状缺损患牙应力分布影响的三维有限元分析

于敬伟¹,谢伟丽²,施梦汝¹,陈钱³,王玥²,焦海斌⁴,徐琳⁵

1. 哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院口腔医院
2. 哈尔滨医科大学附属口腔医院
3. 哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院口腔颌面外科
4. 哈尔滨医科大学
5. 黑龙江省哈尔滨医科大学口腔医学院

收稿日期:2018-08-23 修回日期:2018-10-14 出版日期:2020-01-28 发布日期:2020-01-16
通讯作者: 谢伟丽 E-mail:xwl811@126.com

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of inlay restoration with different materials on the stress distribution of wedge-shaped defects

Received:2018-08-23 Revised:2018-10-14 Online:2020-01-28 Published:2020-01-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的建立下颌第一前磨牙楔状缺损及不同材料嵌体修复后的三维有限元模型，并进行应力分析，以期为临床嵌体修复楔状缺损提供理论参考。方法通过CBCT扫描取得牙体原始数据，借助Mimics 17.0，Geomagic Studio 13.0等软件建立下颌第一前磨牙楔状缺损模型及三维有限元模型，并分别进行树脂嵌体（A）、瓷嵌体（B）、金合金嵌体（C）修复，以未进行修复的楔状缺损模型作为对照组，再利用Abaqus 6.14有限元软件进行牙颈部的应力分析。结果从应力分布来看垂直载荷楔状缺损后剩余牙体组织及嵌体修复后模型均出现两个应力集中区，其中楔状缺损后剩余牙体组织模型主要应力集中在楔状缺损处，嵌体修复后模型主要应力在牙颈部，并发现不同材料嵌体修复后最大主应力值均明显降低。结论不同材料嵌体修复楔状缺损后可使缺损附近的应力集中明显改善，其中瓷嵌体（B）和金合金嵌体（C）与树脂嵌体（A）相比相对理想。

关键词: 嵌体, 楔状缺损, 三维有限元 , 应力

Abstract: Objective To establish a three-dimensional finite element model of the mandibular first premolar wedge-shaped defect and different material inlay restorations, and carry out stress analysis to provide a theoretical reference for clinical inlay restoration of wedge-shaped defects. Methods The raw data of the tooth were obtained by CBCT scanning. The wedge-shaped defect model and the three-dimensional finite element model of the mandibular first premolar were established by Mimics 17.0 and Geomagic Studio 13.0 software, and respectively treated with the resin inlay (A), porcelain inlay (B) and the gold alloy inlay (C), and the undefended wedge-deficient model was used as the control group. Then the stress analysis of the tooth neck was performed using Abaqus 6.14 finite element software. Results From the stress distribution, there were two stress concentration areas in the residual tooth structure and the inlay restoration model after the vertical load wedge defect. The main stress of the remaining tooth body tissue model after wedge deficiency was concentrated in the wedge defect. The main stress of the inlay restoration model was in the neck of the tooth. It was found that the maximum principal stress values of the inlays of different materials were significantly reduced. Conclusion The inlays of different materials can repair the wedge-shaped defect and improve the stress concentration near the defect. The porcelain inlay (B) and the gold alloy inlay (C) are ideal compared with the resin inlay (A).

Key words: Inlay, Wedge-shaped defect, threedimensional finite element, stress

中图分类号:

R783.1

于敬伟谢伟丽施梦汝陈钱王玥焦海斌徐琳. 不同材料嵌体修复对楔状缺损患牙应力分布影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 口腔医学, 2020, 40(1): 31-34.

参考文献 20

[1]	李劲, 吴静. 改良树脂嵌体在楔状缺损中的治疗体会[J]. 中华老年口腔医学杂志, 2017, 15(1):11-13.
[2]	Barizon K T, Bergeron C, Vargas M A, et al. Ceramic materials for porcelain veneers: Part II. Effect of material, shade, and thickness on translucency - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry[J]. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2014, 112(4):864-70.
[3]	Dejak B, Mlotkowski A, Romanowicz M. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion[J]. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2007, 98(2):89-100.
[4]	嵇潇雷, 张瑞, 刘玉,等. 牙体楔状缺损修复中贴面式瓷嵌体的应用[J]. 口腔医学, 2016, 36(2):129-131.
[5]	莫思溯, 鲍炜, 沈晴昳. 纤维桩修复上颌前磨牙穿髓型楔状缺损三维有限元模型的建立[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2018, 22(2):183-188.
[6]	朱静, 李国强, 汪黎明,等. 下颌第一前磨牙不同角度楔状缺损的三维有限元应力分析[J]. 生物医学工程学进展, 2007, 28(4):225-228.
[8]	赵凌, 杨丽媛, 刘翠玲,等. 不同修复方法对深型楔状缺损牙应力分布影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2017, 35(1):77-81.
[9]	夏荣明, 吴小斌. 不同深度楔状缺损的应力分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2005, 21(4):443-444.
[10]	Guimar?es J C, Guimar?es S G, Brand?o D L, et al. Stress amplifications in dental non-carious cervical lesions[J]. Journal of Biomechanics, 2014, 47(2):410-416.
[11]	张丹, 白保晶, 张振庭. 上颌前磨牙全瓷嵌体修复三维有限元模型的建立与应力分析[J]. 北京口腔医学, 2011, 19(1):27-30.
[12]	张珑, 逯宜, 杨柏松,等. CBCT扫描结合逆向工程软件建立邻(牙)嵌体洞型三维有限元模型研究[J]. 中国美容医学杂志, 2011, 20(10):1562-1565.
[13]	Chen K K, Noda N A, Tajima K, et al. Intensity of singular stress fields of wedge-shaped defect in human tooth due to occlusal force before and after restoration with composite resins[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 2017, 231(9):954411917701495.
[14]	Holberg C, Rudzki-Janson I, Wichelhaus A, et al. Ceramic inlays: is the inlay thickness an important factor influencing the fracture risk?[J]. Journal of Dentistry, 2013, 41(7):628-635.
[15]	Sengul F, Gurbuz T, Sengul S. Finite element analysis of different restorative materials in primary teeth restorations[J]. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Official Journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2014, 15(3):317-322.
[16]	Srirekha A, Bashetty K. A comparative analysis of restorative materials used in abfraction lesions in tooth with and without occlusal restoration: Three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. Journal of Conservative Dentistry Jcd, 2013, 16(2):157-161.
[17]	沈晴昳, 王冬梅, 钟群,等. 纤维桩复合树脂修复重度楔状缺损前磨牙的三维有限元分析[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2014, 18(30):4777-4782.
[18]	Selma J, Ivica A, Muhamed A, et al. Biomechanics of cervical tooth region and noncarious cervical lesions of different morphology; three-dimensional finite element analysis:[J]. European Journal of Dentistry, 2016, 10(3):413-418.
[19]	张清, 王嘉德, 霍波. 楔状缺损充填治疗后牙颈部硬组织应力分析[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2003, 38(4):264-265.
[20]	全国艳, 刘洋. 有限元法在口腔修复中载荷条件的研究进展[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2016, 3(7).

[1]	施梦汝谢伟丽施武阁王竹丽于敬伟徐琳王玥. 柱形锥形种植体在不同种植深度的三维有限元研究[J]. , 2019, 39(7): 577-580.
[2]	蒋煜彬顾卫平陈岗童丽. 紧咬型磨牙对后牙游离端种植体周围骨组织应力分布的有限元研究[J]. , 2019, 39(5): 409-413.
[3]	张倩王慧明周益. 种植体平台转移设计研究进展[J]. , 2019, 39(4): 369-374.
[4]	周贯华姜明欣吕欣欣姜雄英. 玻璃纤维桩修复重度楔状缺损的临床观察[J]. , 2019, 39(3): 228-230.
[5]	李施园孙志达梁佳瑜刘梅. 不同厚度及材料对嵌体抗折裂强度的影响及三维有限元分析[J]. , 2019, 39(12): 1073-1077.
[6]	于改改王晗李璇刘昭影朱松. 新型基质材料在降低光固化复合树脂体积收缩方面的研究进展[J]. , 2019, 39(12): 1131-1134.
[7]	唐婉娴刘桂英. 3种方法修复前磨牙楔状缺损的疗效比较[J]. , 2019, 39(1): 52-55.
[8]	张蕾茹菲亚?祖拉提何惠宇葛菲. CAD/CAM全瓷髓高嵌体在牙体缺损中的临床应用研究[J]. , 2018, 38(6): 523-527.
[9]	聂晶晶冯加飞. 应用T-scan III系统对楔状缺损患者牙合接触的研究[J]. , 2018, 38(6): 548-551.
[10]	邢斌. 托槽转矩对上颌前牙整体内收影响的三维有限元分析[J]. , 2018, 38(5): 440-444.
[11]	孙芬刘铭刘名燕. 牵引力介导MC3T3-E1细胞microRNA的差异表达[J]. , 2018, 38(3): 222-226.
[12]	马宏伟刘政君王津惠. 楔状缺损充填治疗的研究进展[J]. , 2018, 38(3): 285-288.
[13]	李雷李宁宁颜冬吴聿淼白璐于淼朱宪春. 两类改良型微钛板种植体辅助上颌前方牵引时上颌骨位移趋势的三维有限元分析[J]. , 2018, 38(12): 1096-1101.
[14]	范佳燕张玲傅柏平. 嵌体临床疗效的影响因素[J]. , 2018, 38(10): 956-960.
[15]	曹桂珍. 改良铸瓷高嵌体用于后牙根管治疗后牙体修复的临床研究[J]. , 2017, 37(8): 715-719.