›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 103-109.

• 美学专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

帐篷螺丝技术与常规GBR在水平骨增量的临床疗效对比

宋应亮1,赵文爽2,宋爽3   

  1. 1. 空军军医大学口腔医院
    2. 第四军医大学口腔医学院种植科
    3. 北京大学医学部
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-05 修回日期:2020-11-19 出版日期:2021-02-28 发布日期:2021-03-03
  • 通讯作者: 宋应亮 E-mail:songyingliang@163.com

Comparison of clinical efficacy between tent screw technique and GBR technique for horizontal bone augment

  • Received:2020-11-05 Revised:2020-11-19 Online:2021-02-28 Published:2021-03-03

摘要: 如今,随着外科技术的创新以及骨替代材料的发展,国内外学者已提出多种水平骨增量技术可以重建牙槽嵴的轮廓,为种植体的初期稳定性提供可靠的保障。然而这些技术的成功也会受到一些因素的影响,本文就水平骨增量的技术要点展开论述,并通过两个病例对帐篷螺丝技术与常规GBR技术用于水平骨增量的临床疗效进行对比、分析,旨在为临床医生对严重牙槽嵴萎缩病例行水平骨增量术的方法选择提供参考。

关键词: 帐篷螺丝技术, GBR, 水平骨增量, 口腔种植

Abstract: Nowadays, with the innovation of surgical technology and the development of bone substitute materials, scholars at home and abroad have proposed a variety of horizontal bone augmentation techniques to reconstruct the contour of alveolar ridge and provide reliable guarantee for the initial stability of implants. However, the success of these techniques will also be affected by some factors. This paper discusses the technical points of horizontal bone augmentation, compares and analyzes the clinical efficacy of tent screw technology and conventional GBR technology in horizontal bone increment through two cases, so as to provide reference for clinicians to choose the method of horizontal bone augmentation for severe alveolar ridge atrophy.

Key words: tent screw technology, GBR, horizontal bone augment, dental implant

中图分类号: