›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 720-723.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

CBCT三维头影测量常用指标的初步探索

李媛1,秦金炜2,侯伟3,张渊岫4,张正东5,王林6   

  1. 1. 南京医科大学口腔疾病研究江苏省重点实验室,南京医科大学附属口腔医院
    2. 江苏省口腔医院
    3. 南京医科大学附属口腔医院
    4. 南京医科大学口腔疾病研究江苏省重点实验室,南京医科大学附属口腔医院正畸科
    5. 南京医科大学公共卫生学院
    6. 南京医科大学口腔疾病研究江苏省重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-22 修回日期:2021-04-01 出版日期:2021-08-28 发布日期:2021-08-28
  • 通讯作者: 王林 E-mail:lw603@njmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    南京市科技发展计划项目

A preliminary study on the common indexes of the CBCT 3D cephalometric analysis

  • Received:2020-09-22 Revised:2021-04-01 Online:2021-08-28 Published:2021-08-28
  • Contact: Lin Wang E-mail:lw603@njmu.edu.cn

摘要: 目的:通过研究三维转化头颅侧位片(二维)头影测量与CBCT三维头影测量两种测量方法测得的部分常用指标的结果的相关性,初步探索CBCT三维头影测量的应用。方法:选择100例符合纳入标准的错牙合畸形患者,对其进行三维转化头颅侧位片头影测量与CBCT三维头影测量,将两种方法的测量结果进行配对样本t检验和拟合优度检验,探讨两者之间的差异性和拟合程度。结果:两种头影测量方法的结果间的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),两种测量方法的结果的拟合优度检验发现,7项指标拟合程度较高(0.8

关键词: 锥体束计算机断层扫描,头影测量,错牙合畸形,牙颌面形态

Abstract: Objective: To study the relevance of the results of the commonly used indicators of the cephalometric measurement obtained from the three-dimensional (3D) transformation lateral cephalometric radiograph and the three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (3D CBCT). Methods: To choose 100 malocclusion patients who fit the inclusion criteria, to do the cephalometric analysis with 2D and 3D methods, and to analyze the difference and the fitting degree between the two methods. Results: The differences between the two cephalometric analysis measurements were statistically significant (P <0.05), 7 indexes had the good fitting and 1 index had the moderate fitting. Objective: To explore preliminarily the application of three-dimensional cephalometric measurement of CBCT by studying the relevance ofthe results of the commonly used indicators of the cephalometric measurement obtained from the three-dimensional (3D) transformation lateral cephalometric radiograph and the three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (3D CBCT).Methods: To choose 100 malocclusion patients who fit the inclusion criteria, to do the cephalometric analysis with 2D and 3D methods, and to analyze the difference and the fitting degree between the two methods.Results: The differences between the two cephalometric analysis measurements were statistically significant (P <0.05), 7 indexes had the good fitting and 1 index had the moderate fitting. There was the correlation between the two cephalometric analysis measurements. Conclusion:The results of the commonly used indicators of the cephalometric measurement obtained from the 3D CBCT can reflect the maxillofacial morphology in patients with malocclusion.The establishment of standardized fixed-point and normal value database of three-dimensional cephalometric measurement needs to be further studied and established.

Key words: CBCT(cone-beam computed tomography), cephalometric measurement, malocclusion, maxillofacial morphology

中图分类号: