基于可视化治疗目标预测正畸软组织变化的研究进展

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 正畸临床上，改善颜面美观已成为越来越多的患者寻求正畸治疗的主诉，而软组织的形态变化较牙组织和骨组织而言却恰恰又是最不确定、最难以预测的。可视化治疗目标（Visual Treatment Objective, VTO）的实施将使患者对治疗目标有更直观的认识，同时提高治疗过程的可预测性和科学性。本文将从可视化治疗目标出发，从理想目标、实现原理、准确性几个方面对正畸后软组织预测的研究进展做一综述。

关键词: 可视化治疗目标, 软组织预测, 口腔正畸

Abstract: In orthodontic clinics, more and more patients have sought orthodontic treatment with the chief complaint of improving facial appearance, but the changes of soft tissue are exactly the most uncertain and difficult to predict compared with dental tissue and bone tissue. The implementation of Visual Treatment Objective (VTO) enables patients to have a more intuitive understanding of the treatment objective, and at the same time improves the predictability and scientificity of the treatment process. In this article, based on Visual Treatment Objective, we review the goal, principle and accuracy of soft tissue prediction in orthodontic treatment.

Key words: visual treatment objective, soft tissue prediction, orthodontics

中图分类号:

R783.5

吴雁格张紫涵巩靖蕾黄艳梅王军. 基于可视化治疗目标预测正畸软组织变化的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学, 2021, 41(8): 742-745.

参考文献 36

[1]	Ricketts RM. Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation[J]. Am J Orthod, 1968,54(4): 272-289.
[2]	Lines PA, Lines RR, Lines CA. Profilemetrics and facial esthetics[J]. Am J Orthod, 1978,73(6): 648-657.
[3]	Chong HT, Thea KW, Descallar J, et al. Comparison of White and Chinese perception of esthetic Chinese lip position[J]. Angle Orthod, 2014,84(2): 246-253.
[4]	Shi Q, Zheng H, Hu R. Preferences of color and lip position for facial attractiveness by laypersons and orthodontists[J]. Patient Prefer Adherence, 2016,10: 355-361.
[5]	Nomura M, Motegi E, Hatch JP, et al. Esthetic preferences of European American, Hispanic American, Japanese, and African judges for soft-tissue profiles[J]. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2009,135(4): S87-S95.
[6]	Owen AR. Diagnostic block cephalometrics. Part 2[J]. J Clin Orthod, 1984,18(7): 478-493.
[7]	Arnett GW, Jelic JS, Kim J, et al. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1999,116(3): 239-253.
[8]	Wen YF, Wong HM, Lin R, et al. Inter-Ethnic/Racial Facial Variations: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Photogrammetric Studies[J]. PLoS One, 2015,10(8): e134525.
[9]	Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I[J]. Am J Orthod, 1983,84(1): 1-28.
[10]	Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning[J]. Am J Orthod, 1967,53(4): 262-284.
[11]	Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment: Report of a case[J]. American Journal of Orthodontics, 1960,46(10): 721-735.
[12]	Merrifield LL. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics[J]. Am J Orthod, 1966,52(11): 804-822.
[13]	Smith JD, Thomas PM, Proffit WR. A comparison of current prediction imaging programs[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2004,125(5): 527-536.
[14]	Li JS, Zhou TS, Chu J, et al. Design and development of an international clinical data exchange system: the international layer function of the Dolphin Project[J]. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2011,18(5): 683-689.
[15]	Cangialosi TJ, Chung JM, Elliott DF, et al. Reliability of computer-generated prediction tracing[J]. Angle Orthod, 1995,65(4): 277-284.
[16]	Hodges A, Rossouw PE, Campbell PM, et al. Prediction of lip response to four first premolar extractions in white female adolescents and adults[J]. Angle Orthod, 2009,79(3): 413-421.
[17]	Shirvani A, Sadeghian S, Abbasi S. Prediction of lip response to orthodontic treatment using a multivariable regression model[J]. Dent Res J (Isfahan), 2016,13(1): 38-45.
[18]	Sodagar A, Borujeni DG, Amini G. Prediction of soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic retraction of incisors in Iranian girls[J]. World J Orthod, 2010,11(3): 262-268.
[19]	Lo LJ, Weng JL, Ho CT, et al. Three-dimensional region-based study on the relationship between soft and hard tissue changes after orthognathic surgery in patients with prognathism[J]. PLoS One, 2018,13(8): e200589.
[20]	Kaklamanos EG, Kolokitha OE. Relation between soft tissue and skeletal changes after mandibular setback surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2016,44(4): 427-435.
[21]	Maetevorakul S, Viteporn S. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion[J]. Prog Orthod, 2016,17: 13.
[22]	Kolokitha OE, Chatzistavrou E. Factors influencing the accuracy of cephalometric prediction of soft tissue profile changes following orthognathic surgery[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2012,11(1): 82-90.
[23]	Xia JJ, Shevchenko L, Gateno J, et al. Outcome study of computer-aided surgical simulation in the treatment of patients with craniomaxillofacial deformities[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011,69(7): 2014-2024.
[24]	Aboul-Hosn CS, Hernandez-Alfaro F. 3D planning in orthognathic surgery: CAD/CAM surgical splints and prediction of the soft and hard tissues results - our experience in 16 cases[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2012,40(2): 162-168.
[25]	Mazzoni S, Bianchi A, Schiariti G, et al. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing cutting guides and customized titanium plates are useful in upper maxilla waferless repositioning[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015,73(4): 701-707.
[26]	Plooij JM, Maal TJ, Haers P, et al. Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011,40(4): 341-352.
[27]	Mollemans W, Schutyser F, NADJMI N, et al. Predicting soft tissue deformations for a maxillofacial surgery planning system: from computational strategies to a complete clinical validation[J]. Med Image Anal, 2007,11(3): 282-301.
[28]	Zhang X, Mei L, Yan X, et al. Accuracy of computer-aided prediction in soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2019,156(6): 823-831.
[29]	van Twisk PH, Tenhagen M, Gul A, et al. How accurate is the soft tissue prediction of Dolphin Imaging for orthognathic surgery?[J]. Int Orthod, 2019,17(3): 488-496.
[30]	Peterman RJ, Jiang S, Johe R, et al. Accuracy of Dolphin visual treatment objective (VTO) prediction software on class III patients treated with maxillary advancement and mandibular setback[J]. Prog Orthod, 2016,17(1): 19.
[31]	Stefanovic N, Glisic B, Sceoan I. Reliability of computerized cephalometric outcome predictions of mandibular set-back surgery[J]. Srp Arh Celok Lek, 2011,139(3-4): 138-142.
[32]	Lu W, Zhang X, Mei L, et al. Orthodontic incisor retraction caused changes in the soft tissue chin area: a retrospective study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020,20(1): 108.
[33]	Knoops P, Borghi A, Breakey R, et al. Three-dimensional soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery: a clinical comparison of Dolphin, ProPlan CMF, and probabilistic finite element modelling[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019,48(4): 511-518.
[34]	Likitmongkolsakul U, Smithmaitrie P, Samruajbenjakun B, et al. Development and Validation of 3D Finite Element Models for Prediction of Orthodontic Tooth Movement[J]. Int J Dent, 2018,2018: 4927503.
[35]	Chen S, Lou H, Guo L, et al. 3-D finite element modelling of facial soft tissue and preliminary application in orthodontics[J]. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 2012,15(3): 255-261.
[36]	Van Hemelen G, Van Genechten M, Renier L, et al. Three-dimensional virtual planning in orthognathic surgery enhances the accuracy of soft tissue prediction[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2015,43(6): 918-925.