›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 685-691.

• 基础研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

All-on-Four与穿颧种植在不同皮质骨厚度中的生物力学研究

王璨,顾卫平,朱琳,陈岗   

  1. 南京医科大学附属口腔医院
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-09 修回日期:2021-04-19 出版日期:2021-08-28 发布日期:2021-08-28
  • 通讯作者: 顾卫平 E-mail:willim90@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目

A biomechanical study of All-on-Four and zygomatic implants in different cortical bone thickness

  • Received:2021-03-09 Revised:2021-04-19 Online:2021-08-28 Published:2021-08-28
  • Contact: Wei-Ping GU E-mail:willim90@163.com

摘要: 目的:利用有限元分析法,比较在不同皮质骨厚度下后牙区垂直骨量严重不足的上颌无牙颌中All-on-Four与穿颧植体这两种不同种植设计中种植体、皮质骨的应力值与钛支架的变形量的差异,为临床种植方案的设计提供参考依据。 方法:选取一无牙颌上颌骨锥形束CT数据并利用其建立4个不同皮质骨厚度的模型,模型中还包括了种植体、基台、钛支架,在双侧后牙区施加200N垂直压力,计算出种植体、皮质骨的应力值及钛支架的变形量并进行统计分析。 结果:随着皮质骨厚度的增加,All-on-Four组与穿颧植体组中种植体、皮质骨应力值及钛支架变形量逐渐减小,在All-on-Four组中,当皮质骨厚度由0.5mm增加到1.5mm时,各数据降低明显,当皮质骨厚度由1.5mm增加到2mm时各数据变化较小,并且,当皮质骨厚度为1.5mm时,等效应力和变形量均达到一个较低的水平。在穿颧植体组中,随着皮质骨厚度的变化总体变化趋势均较小,穿颧植体组的种植体、皮质骨应力值及钛支架变形量均小于All-on-Four组,且5号位点皮质骨、2号位点皮质骨及钛支架变形量之间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论:对于后牙区垂直骨量严重不足的上颌无牙颌,皮质骨厚度的增加有利于减小种植修复的应力分布和钛支架的变形;当皮质骨厚度较小时(<1.5mm),穿颧植体的种植方案是更为合适的选择;当皮质骨厚度较厚时(≥1.5mm),虽然穿颧植体组中的数据表现较All-on-Four组好,但All-on-Four组中各数据已明显降低,此时,也可以考虑选择All-on-Four进行修复。

关键词: 上颌无牙颌, 种植固定义齿, 有限元分析, all-on-four, 穿颧植体

Abstract: Objective: To compare the stress of implant and cortical bone and the deformation of titanium framework, using different design of All-on-Four and zygomatic implants with various thickness of cortical bone , via finite element analysis in the maxillary edentulous with severe insufficient vertical bone in the posterior region. Methods: An CBCT data of an maxillary edentulous was selected to establish four different cortical bone thickness models. The model also included implant, abutment and titanium framework. The stress of the implant and cortical bone and the deformation of the titanium framework were calculated with a vertical load of 200N bilaterally in the posterior region. Results: With the increase of cortical bone thickness, the stress of implant and cortical bone and the deformation of the titanium framework gradually decreased. In the All-on-Four model. When the thickness of cortical bone increased from 0.5mm to 1.5mm, the stress and the deformation decreased significantly while the thickness of cortical bone increased from 1.5mm to 2.0mm, the decrease tended to level off. Both of the stress and the deformation had reached a very low level at 1.5mm cortical thickness point.However, in zygomatic implant model ,the change appeared slightly from various cortical bone thickness. Being compared with each other, the stress of implant and cortical bone and the deformation of titanium framework in the zygomatic implant model are smaller than those in the All-on-Four model, and there was a statistical difference in the stress of cortical bone and the deformation of titanium framework at the sites of second premolar and lateral incisor (P<0.05). Conclusion: For maxillary edentulous with insufficient vertical bone in the posterior region, the increase in the thickness of cortical bone is beneficial to reduce the stress distribution of implant and cortical bone and deformation of titanium framework. The zygomatic implant is a more suitable design in the thin cortical bone(<1.5mm). If the cortical bone is thick(≥1.5mm), though the zygomatic implant model is better than the All-on-Four model, the distribution of the stress and deformation decrease significantly in the All-on-Four model. Thus, we can take the All-on-Four into consideration for patients in this condition.

Key words: edentulous maxilla, fixed implant prosthesis, finite element analysis, all-on-four, zygomatic implant

中图分类号: