数字化导板在下颌舌侧后牙区埋伏多生牙拔除中的应用

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.11.005

口腔医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 984-989.doi: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.11.005

数字化导板在下颌舌侧后牙区埋伏多生牙拔除中的应用

李长顺^1,2, 张堃², 刘刚², 魏路明², 朱绍跃², 胡光宇², 宋晓萌¹

1 南京医科大学附属口腔医院口腔颌面外科,江苏省口腔疾病研究重点试验室,江苏省口腔转化医学工程研究中心,江苏南京(210029);
2 徐州医科大学附属口腔医院口腔颌面外科,江苏徐州(221002)

收稿日期:2021-07-13 出版日期:2022-11-28 发布日期:2022-11-25
通讯作者: 宋晓萌 Tel:(025)85031881E-mail:xiaomengsong@njmu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(81772887);江苏省医学创新团队资助项目(CXTD2017036);江苏省高校优势学科建设工程(2018-87);徐州市卫生健康委科技项目(XWKYSL20220135)

Application of digital guide plate in extraction of impacted supernumerary teeth in the lingual region of mandibular posterior region

LI Changshun, ZHANG Kun, LIU Gang, WEI Luming, ZHU Shaoyue, HU Guangyu, SONG Xiaomeng

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Jiangsu Province Engineering Researching Center of Stomatological Translation Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China

Received:2021-07-13 Online:2022-11-28 Published:2022-11-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨数字化导板在下颌舌侧后牙区埋伏多生牙拔除中的应用,并评价其效果。方法选取2020年1月—2020年11月于徐州医科大学附属口腔医院颌面外科病房就诊的双侧下颌舌侧后牙区埋伏多生牙患者10例。采用自身对照方法,试验侧通过数字化定位导板拔除埋伏多生牙。对照侧不使用导板进行常规微创手术。记录导板制作时间、完成手术时间、术后肿胀及疼痛等发生情况。结果试验组平均手术时间为(19.84±6.52)min,对照组为(31.03±9.68)min,试验组术后的疼痛和肿胀程度明显低于对照组。经统计分析,两组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用数字化定位导板技术拔除埋伏多生牙,可显著缩短手术时间,手术并发症明显减少,提高手术质量,值得临床推广。

关键词: 数字化导板, 下颌舌侧后牙区, 多生牙, 微创拔除

Abstract: Objective To investigate the application of digital guide plate in extraction of impacted supernumerary teeth in the lingual region of mandibular posterior region and evaluate its efficacy. Methods From January to November, 2020, 10 patients with bilateral impacted supernumerary teeth in the lingual region of bilateral mandibular posterior region treated in the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University were enrolled in this study. By self-contrast method, one side of 10 patients were treated with digital guide plate to remove the impacted supernumerary teeth (test group). The other side which was treated without using guide plate for operation served as the control group. The manufacture time, operation time, postoperative swelling and pain were compared between the two groups. Results The average time of operation was significantly shorter in the test group ((19.84±6.52) min) than in the control group ((31.03±9.68) min), and the degree of postoperative pain and swelling was significantly lower than the control group. Statistics showed that differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of digital guide plate in extraction of impacted supernumerary teeth in the lingual region of the mandibular posterior region can significantly shorten operation time, reduce surgical complications and improve surgery quality, which has good application prospect.

Key words: digital guide plate, lingual region of the mandibular posterior region, supernumerary tooth, minimal invasion extraction

中图分类号:

R782.11

李长顺, 张堃, 刘刚, 魏路明, 朱绍跃, 胡光宇, 宋晓萌. 数字化导板在下颌舌侧后牙区埋伏多生牙拔除中的应用[J]. 口腔医学, 2022, 42(11): 984-989.

LI Changshun, ZHANG Kun, LIU Gang, WEI Luming, ZHU Shaoyue, HU Guangyu, SONG Xiaomeng. Application of digital guide plate in extraction of impacted supernumerary teeth in the lingual region of mandibular posterior region[J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(11): 984-989.

参考文献

[1] Wang XP, Fan JB. Molecular genetics of supernumerary toothformation[J]. Genesis, 2011, 49(4):261-277.
[2] Bayrak S, Dalci K, Sari S. Case report:Evaluation of supernumerary teeth with computerized tomography[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2005, 100(4):e65-e69.
[3] De Oliveira Gomes C, Drummond SN, Jham BC, et al. A survey of 460 supernumerary teeth in Brazilian children and adolescents[J]. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2008, 18(2):98-106.
[4] Anthonappa RP, Omer RS, King NM. Characteristics of 283 supernumerary teeth in southern Chinese children[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 105(6):e48-e54.
[5] Parolia A, Kundabala M, Dahal M, et al. Management of supernumerary teeth[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2011, 14(3):221-224.
[6] 钱庆慰, 余佳杰, 马宏涛. 下颌后牙区舌侧埋伏阻生牙拔除术中微创技术应用研究[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2019, 12(9):561-564.
[7] 刘宪光, 张君, 李成龙, 等. 558例多生牙临床特点的回顾性分析[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2017, 55(3):121-124.
[8] 皮昕. 口腔解剖生理学[M]. 6版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2007:93-95.
[9] 郑相淮, 林曦, 柴金友, 等. 数字化定位导板在埋伏多生牙拔除中的应用[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2020, 40(6):907-910.
[10] Prasad TS, Sujatha G, Muruganandhan J, et al. Three-dimensional printing in reconstructive oral and maxillofacial surgery[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2018, 19(1):1-2.
[11] Demian N, Pearl C, Woernley TC, et al. Surgical navigation for oral and maxillofacial surgery[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 2019, 31(4):531-538.
[12] Chen X, Xu L, Sun Y, et al. A review of computer-aided oral and maxillofacial surgery:Planning, simulation and navigation[J]. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2016, 13(11):1043-1051.
[13] 马文, 李燕妮, 王立冬, 等. 数字化导板在多生牙拔除术中的应用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(11):1030-1034.
[14] Açikgöz A, Açikgöz G, Tunga U, et al. Characteristics and prevalence of non-syndrome multiple supernumerary teeth:A retrospective study[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2006, 35(3):185-190.
[15] 宋治锋, 费菲. 埋伏多生牙微创精准拔除85例临床研究[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2020,28(3):169-173.
[16] Shah A, Gill DS,Tredwin C, et al. Diagnosis and management of supernumerary teeth[J]. Dent Updat, 2008, 35(8):510-512,514-516,519-520.
[17] 谷达明, 文瑜, 谷益豪. 上颌前牙区埋伏牙对牙列功能变异的临床分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2018, 47(29):3826-3827.
[18] Liu DG, Zhang WL,Zhang ZY, et al. Three-dimensional evaluations of supernumerary teeth using cone-beam computed tomography for 487 cases[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2007, 103(3):403-411.
[19] Kapila S, Conley RS, Harrell WE Jr. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2011, 40(1):24-34.
[20] Wang J, Cui NH,Guo YJ, et al. Navigation-guided extraction of impacted supernumerary teeth:A case report[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 75(6):1136.e1-1131136.e5.
[21] Jo C,Bae D, Choi B, et al. Removal of supernumerary teeth utilizing a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guide[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 75(5):924.e1-924924.e9.
[22] Liu PC, Wang ZX. Application of surgical locating guides on impacted supernumerary teeth extraction[J]. West China J Stomatol, 2019, 37(1):58-61.

数字化导板在下颌舌侧后牙区埋伏多生牙拔除中的应用

Application of digital guide plate in extraction of impacted supernumerary teeth in the lingual region of mandibular posterior region

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	倪伟嘉林晓鹏姚芳. CBCT结合微创技术与传统技术拔除埋伏多生牙的临床比较[J]. , 2018, 38(6): 543-547.
[2]	贺祖武易凌王杨丽. 22颗第四磨牙临床分析[J]. , 2018, 38(2): 158-161.
[3]	万竹青沈国芳. 正颌手术上颌骨精确定位技术的进展[J]. , 2018, 38(10): 934-937.
[4]	吴迪孙科. 4例磨牙区多生牙[J]. , 2016, 36(8): 753-755.
[5]	马露吴煜农. 双侧上颌第四磨牙1例[J]. , 2015, 35(2): 145-146.
[6]	罗远刘世勳. 下颌双侧第四磨牙近中阻生一例[J]. , 2014, 34(8): 587-587.
[7]	朱桂钱古润智陈培申. 全景片检查上颌多生牙漏诊1例[J]. , 2014, 34(11): 881-881.
[8]	阮丹平刘丽吴春云. 上颌双尖牙区多生牙1例[J]. , 2013, 33(1): 0-0.
[9]	万桂芹. 上颌前牙区埋伏多生牙的临床治疗与护理体会[J]. , 2011, 31(11): 701-702.
[10]	魏建芬,程喆. 双侧上下颌前磨牙区多生牙1例[J]. , 2011, 31(10): 581-.
[11]	王涛,江毅,愈明明. 双侧下颌第三磨牙区多生牙1例[J]. , 2009, 29(7): 371-.
[12]	顾仓临,金蕾,严二雄. 儿童上颌前部埋伏多生牙的临床分析及手术体会[J]. , 2009, 29(2): 107-108.
[13]	闫智奇,朱玲,吕雪芹,孙超. 颅骨锁骨发育不全1例[J]. , 2009, 29(1): 26-29.
[14]	孙俊鹏,王春玲. 正畸治疗成人下颌第一磨牙缺失的临床探讨[J]. , 2008, 28(4): 210-211.
[15]	戴杰;王沙彬;赵国强. 全口8颗多生牙1例[J]. , 2008, 28(12): 633-633.