[1] |
Pour NN, Ghaedi B, Sohrabi M. Soft-tissue esthetic outcome of single implants: Immediate placement in fresh extraction sockets versus conventional placement in healed sockets[J]. J Indian Soc Periodontol, 2018, 22(3):249-253.
doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_21_18
pmid: 29962705
|
[2] |
Gluckman H, Nagy K, Du Toit J. Prosthetic management of implants placed with the socket-shield technique[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 121(4):581-585.
doi: S0022-3913(18)30562-6
pmid: 30554825
|
[3] |
Mangano FG, Mangano C, Ricci M, et al. Esthetic evaluation of single-tooth Morse taper connection implants placed in fresh extraction sockets or healed sites[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2013, 39(2):172-181.
doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00112
pmid: 22126700
|
[4] |
Esposito M, Zucchelli G, Cannizzaro G, et al. Immediate, immediate-delayed (6 weeks) and delayed (4 months) post-extractive single implants: 1-year post-loading data from a randomised controlled trial[J]. Eur J Oral Implantol, 2017, 10(1):11-26.
pmid: 28327692
|
[5] |
Evans CDJ, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(1):73-80.
|
[6] |
Brown SDK, Payne AGT. Immediately restored single implants in the aesthetic zone of the maxilla using a novel design: 1-year report[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(4):445-454.
doi: 10.1111/clr.2011.22.issue-4
|
[7] |
Hürzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, et al. The socket-shield technique: A proof-of-principle report[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2010, 37(9):855-862.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01595.x
pmid: 20712701
|
[8] |
Chen C, Pan Y. Socketshield technique for ridge preservation: a case report[J]. J Prosthod Implantol, 2013, 2(2):16-21.
|
[9] |
Gluckman H, Toit JD, Salama M. The socket-shield technique to support the buccofacial tissues at immediate implant placement[J]. Int Dent Afr Ed, 2015, 5(3):6-14.
|
[10] |
Al Dary H, Private p PAJ, AlHadidi A. The socket shield technique using bone trephine: A case report[J]. Int J Dent Oral Sci, 2015: 1-5.
|
[11] |
Dash S, Mohapatra A, Srivastava G, et al. Retaining and regaining esthetics in the anterior maxillary region using the socket-shield technique[J]. Contemp Clin Dent, 2020, 11(2):158-161.
doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_16_20
|
[12] |
Mitsias ME, Siormpas KD, Kontsiotou-Siormpa E, et al. A step-by-step description of PDL-mediated ridge preservation for immediate implant rehabilitation in the esthetic region[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2015, 35(6):835-841.
doi: 10.11607/prd.2148
pmid: 26509987
|
[13] |
Bäumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, et al. The socket-shield technique: First histological, clinical, and volumetrical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment-a pilot study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(1):71-82.
doi: 10.1111/cid.2015.17.issue-1
|
[14] |
Cherel F, Etienne D. Papilla preservation between two implants: A modified socket-shield technique to maintain the scalloped anatomy? A case report[J]. Quintessence Int, 2014, 45(1):23-30.
doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a30765
pmid: 24392492
|
[15] |
Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K. Proximal socket shield for interimplant papilla preservation in the esthetic zone[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2013, 33(1):e24-e31.
doi: 10.11607/prd.1346
pmid: 23342355
|
[16] |
Mitsias ME, Siormpas KD, Kotsakis GA, et al. The root membrane technique: Human histologic evidence after five years of function[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017, 2017: 7269467.
|
[17] |
Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. A retrospective evaluation of 128 socket-shield cases in the esthetic zone and posterior sites: Partial extraction therapy with up to 4 years follow-up[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(2):122-129.
doi: 10.1111/cid.2018.20.issue-2
|
[18] |
Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, et al. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: A 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009, 24(4):712-719.
|
[19] |
Ganapathy D, Sathyamoorthy A, Ranganathan H, et al. Effect of resin bonded luting agents influencing marginal discrepancy in all ceramic complete veneer crowns[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2016, 10(12):ZC67-ZC70.
|
[20] |
Zweers J, Thomas RZ, Slot DE, et al. Characteristics of periodo-ntal biotype, its dimensions, associations and prevalence: A systematic review[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2014, 41(10):958-971.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12275
|
[21] |
Chappuis V, Araújo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2017, 73(1):73-83.
|
[22] |
Boynueğ D, Nemli SK, Kasko YA. Significance of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: A prospective comparative study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24(8):928-933.
doi: 10.1111/clr.2013.24.issue-8
|
[23] |
Cardaropoli G, Lekholm U, Wennström JL. Tissue alterations at implant-supported single-tooth replacements: A 1-year prospective clinical study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2006, 17(2):165-171.
doi: 10.1111/clr.2006.17.issue-2
|
[24] |
Morton D, Chen ST, Martin WC, et al. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding optimizing esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29(Suppl):216-220.
|
[25] |
Spray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, et al. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: Stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering[J]. Ann Periodontol, 2000, 5(1):119-128.
doi: 10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.119
pmid: 11885170
|
[26] |
Cabello G, Rioboo M, Fábrega JG. Immediate placement and restoration of implants in the aesthetic zone with a trimodal approach: Soft tissue alterations and its relation to gingival biotype[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013, 24(10):1094-1100.
doi: 10.1111/clr.2013.24.issue-10
|
[27] |
裴润生, 陈学军, 程玉叶, 等. 牙龈生物型对上前牙种植修复美学区牙龈诱导效果的影响[J]. 南通大学学报(医学版), 2019, 39(5):356-358.
|
[28] |
Gharpure AS, Bhatavadekar NB. Current evidence on the socket-shield technique: A systematic review[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2017, 43(5):395-403.
doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00118
pmid: 28604262
|
[29] |
Blaschke C, Schwass DR. The socket-shield technique: A critical literature review[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2020, 6(1):52.
doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00246-2
pmid: 32893327
|
[30] |
Bäumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, et al. Socket shield technique for immediate implant placement-clinical, radiographic and volumetric data after 5 years[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(11):1450-1458.
doi: 10.1111/clr.2017.28.issue-11
|
[31] |
Dugan DJ, Getz JB, Epker BN. Root banking to preserve alveolar bone: A review and clinical recommendation[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 1981, 103(5):737-743.
pmid: 7028840
|
[32] |
Lang NP, Löe H. The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health[J]. J Periodontol, 1972, 43(10):623-627.
doi: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.10.623
pmid: 4507712
|
[33] |
Tan Z, Kang J, Liu WJ, et al. The effect of the heights and thicknesses of the remaining root segments on buccal bone resorption in the socket-shield technique: An experimental study in dogs[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(3):352-359.
doi: 10.1111/cid.2018.20.issue-3
|
[34] |
Calvo-Guirado JL, Troiano M, López-López PJ, et al. Different configuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: An experimental study in dog mandible[J]. Ann Anat Anat Anzeiger, 2016, 208: 109-115.
|