›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 923-926.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

Tip-Edge plus技术和MBT技术矫治成人安氏Ⅱ1类错的对比研究

顾永佳1,顾鑫宇1,陆胜男1,章婷1,石慧1,高美琴2   

  1. 1. 南通市口腔医院
    2. 江苏省南通市口腔医院
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-30 修回日期:2016-07-20 出版日期:2016-10-28 发布日期:2016-10-25
  • 通讯作者: 高美琴 E-mail:ntgmq@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    南通市科学技术局基金

A comparative study of Tip-Edge plus and MBT techniques in adult classⅡ1 orthodontic treatment

  • Received:2016-05-30 Revised:2016-07-20 Online:2016-10-28 Published:2016-10-25

摘要: 【摘要】目的 观察并比较Tip-Edge plus差动直丝弓技术和MBT滑动直丝弓技术治疗成人安氏Ⅱ1类错合的效果。方法 根据纳入标准选择安氏Ⅱ1类错合畸形患者40例,随机分成两组。实验组20例采用Tip-Edge plus矫治器,对照组20例采用MBT矫治器配合中等支抗进行治疗。治疗前后拍摄头颅侧位片并测量,进行成组和配对t检验。结果 (1)未使用额外支抗的实验组与使用中等支抗的对照组取得相似的软硬组织效果,两组上磨牙前移量无统计学差异,实验组矫治后下切牙唇倾度大于对照组。(2)实验组打开咬合平均需3.8个月,平均复诊次数为16次;对照组打开咬合平均6.3个月,平均复诊次数为22次,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对于需要使用中度支抗的成人安氏Ⅱ1类错合患者应用Tip-Edge plus技术和MBT滑动直丝弓技术矫正能取得相似的软硬组织效果、支抗效果,但Tip-Edge plus技术打开咬合时间短,能明显减少复诊次数。

关键词: 【关键词】 Tip-Edge plus技术, MBT直丝弓技术, 安氏Ⅱ1类错合

Abstract: A comparison of ?tip-edge?plus and MBT techniques in adult ClassⅡ1 orthodontic treatment [Abstract] Objective :To compare the outcomes of class II Division 1 patients with Tip-Edge plus and MBT straight wire technique.Methods :Forty Class II malocclusion patients with four first premolars extracted were recruited. The experimental group used Tip-Edge plus appliance, the control group was treated with MBT straight wire appliance with anchorages. Computerized cephalometric analysis was carried out.Paired t tests and Student’S t-tests were performed.Results: (1) the experimental group and the use of medium anchorage control group achieved similar to the soft and hard tissue effect, two groups of upper molar amount of no statistical difference in the experimental group after the treatment of the lower incisors and the lip inclination than the control group. (2) the experimental group took 3.8 months to open bite average , the average number of return visits were 16 times; the control group took 6.3 months to open bite, and the average number of return visits were 22 times, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions: the tip edge plus technology and MBT straight wire arch technique for correction of adult class II Division 1 malocclusion achieved similar to the soft and hard tissue effect, the same anchorage effect, but the tip edge plus technology bite opening time is short, can significantly reduce the number of follow-up.

Key words: [Key words] Tip-Edge plus technology, MBT straight wire technique, Class II Division 1 malocclusion

中图分类号: