储存媒介对钛种植体生物活性的影响

›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 1051-1053.

储存媒介对钛种植体生物活性的影响

韩石磊,谢伟丽

哈尔滨医科大学附属口腔医院

收稿日期:2016-04-14 修回日期:2016-06-17 出版日期:2016-11-28 发布日期:2016-11-29
通讯作者: 谢伟丽 E-mail:xwl811@126.com
基金资助:
黑龙江省科技攻关项目

Effects of storage mediums on the bioactivity of titanium implant

Received:2016-04-14 Revised:2016-06-17 Online:2016-11-28 Published:2016-11-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 钛种植体产品从制备完成到最终应用到患者身上，会经历一段生物学活性老化的过程，如何保持种植体高度的生物学活性，成为人们关注的焦点。该文就种植体的保存媒介对其生物学活性的影响做一综述，为今后临床上储存种植体提供借鉴。

关键词: 钛, 种植体, 生物学活性, 保存方法

Abstract: During the period of preparation and application to the patients, titanium implants will undergo the biological aging process. It has been the focus on how to preserve the bioactivity of titanium implants. This article reviewed the effects of different storage mediums on titanium implants bioactivity and provides reference for the following clinical research.

Key words: titanium, implant, bioactivity, storage method

中图分类号:

R783.1

韩石磊谢伟丽. 储存媒介对钛种植体生物活性的影响[J]. , 2016, 36(11): 1051-1053.

参考文献

[1]何福明,赵士芳.口腔种植系统研发现状[J].浙江大学学报医学版,2012,41(3):229-33
[2]Att W,Ogawa T.Biological aging of implant surfaces and their restoration with ultraviolet light treatment: a novel understanding of osseointegration[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2012,27(4):753-761
[3]　李少冰.紫外线辐照对喷砂酸蚀纯钛表面生物学活性影响的体外实验研究[D].广州：南方医科大学,2012
[4]王恒,尚任,关云等.不同保存环境对紫外线照射后钛表面生物活性的影响[J].口腔材料学研究,2013,48(5):294-298
[5]Buser D,Broggini N,Wieland M,et al.Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface[J].J Dent Res,2004,83(7):529-533
[6]Shen JW,Chen Y,Yang GL,et al.Effects of storage medium and UV photofunctionalization on time-related changes of titanium surface characteristics and biocompatibility[J].J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater,2015,104(5):932-940
[7]Wennerberg A,Svanborg LM,Berner S,et al.Spontaneously formed nanostructures on titanium surfaces[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2013,24(2):203-209
[8]Li S,Ni J,Liu X,et al.Surface characteristics and biocompatibility of sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface modified by ultraviolet irradiation: an in vitro study[J].J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater,2012,100(6):1587-1598
[9]Park JH,Olivares-Navarrete R,Robert E,et al.Effect of cleaning and sterilization on titanium implant surface properties and cellular response[J].Acta Biomaterialia,2012,8(5):1966-1975
[10]Suzuki T,Kubo K,Hori N,et al.Nonvolatile buffer coating of titanium to prevent its biological aging and for drug delivery[J].Biomaterials,2010,31(18):4818-4828
[11]Att W,Hori N,Takeuchi M,et al.Time-dependent degradation of titanium osteoconductivity: an implication of biological aging of implant materials[J].Biomaterials,2009,30(29):5352-5363
[12]Hori N,Att W,Ueno T,et al.Age-dependent degradation of the protein adsorption capacity of titanium[J].J Dent Res,2009,88(7):663-667
[13]Hori N,Ueno T,Suzuki T,et al.Ultraviolet light treatment for the restoration of age-related degradation of titanium bioactivity[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2010,25(1):49-62
[14]Att W,Hori N,Iwasa F,et al.The effect of UV-photofunctionalization on the time-related bioactivity of titanium and chromium-cobalt alloys[J].Biomaterials,2009,30(26):4268-4276
[15]Lee JH,Ogawa T.The biological aging of titanium implants[J].Implant Dent,2012,21(5):415-421
[16]Han I,Vagaska B,Hori N,et al.Promoted cell and material interaction on atmospheric pressure plasma treated titanium[J].Applied Surface Science,2012,258(10):4718-4723
[17]Zhao YD,Gao Y,Yue J,et al.Effect of argon protection on the biological activity of acid etched titanium surface[J].Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2015,19(9):1568-1576
[18]Lu H,Zhou L,Wan L,et al.Effects of storage methods on time-related changes of titanium surface properties and cellular response[J].Biomed Mater,2012,7(5):1088-1098
[19]Wennerberg A,Galli S,Albrektsson T,et al.Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface[J].Clin Cosmet Investig Dent,2011,5(3):59-67
[20]Donos N,Hamlet S,Lang NP,et al.Gene expression profile of osseointegration of a hydrophilic compared with a hydrophobic microrough implant surface[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2011,22(4):365-372
[21]Hayashi R,Ueno T,Migita S,et al.Hydrocarbon deposition attenuates osteoblast activity on titanium[J].J Dent Res,2014,93(7):698-703
[22]陈学林,肖月.贮存条件对喷砂酸蚀钛种植体表面成骨细胞活性的影响[J].口腔医学研究,2016,32(2):168-171
[23]Lossd?rfer S,Schwartz Z,Wang L,et al.Microrough implant surface topographies increase osteogenesis by reducing osteoclast formation and activity[J].J Biomed Mater Res A,2004,70(3):361-369
[24]Suzuki T,Hori N,Att W,et al.Ultraviolet treatment overcomes time-related degrading bioactivity of titanium[J].T12 Eng Part A,2009,15(12):3679-3688
[25]Wennerberg A,Jimbo R,Stubinger S,et al.Nanostructures and hydrophilicity influence osseointegration: a biomechanical study in the rabbit tibia[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2014,25(9):1041-1050
[26]Schlegel KA,Prechtl C,Most T,et al.Osseointegration of SLActive implants in diabetic pigs[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2013,24(2):128-134
[27]Bornstein MM,Valderrama P,Iones AA,et al.Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2008,19(3):233-241
[28]Lang NP,Salvi GE,Huynh-Ba G,et al.Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2011,22(4):349-356