光固化流体树脂窝沟封闭防龋疗效的评价

›› 2016, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 132-134.

光固化流体树脂窝沟封闭防龋疗效的评价

韩静¹,于洪波²,焦菲菲³

1. 上海市松江区中心医院
2. 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院
3. 上海市口腔病防治院

收稿日期:2015-08-28 修回日期:2015-11-26 出版日期:2016-02-28 发布日期:2016-02-29
通讯作者: 焦菲菲 E-mail:jiaofeifei@sdu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金;上海市申康基金;上海交通大学医工结合项目

Clinical evaluation of Light-cured Flowable Resin in Preventing Pit and Fissure Caries

Received:2015-08-28 Revised:2015-11-26 Online:2016-02-28 Published:2016-02-29
Contact: Fei-Fei JIAO E-mail:jiaofeifei@sdu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： ［摘要］目的比较光固化流体树脂与光固化窝沟封闭剂在儿童新生恒牙窝沟封闭预防龋坏的临床效果。方法临床选取150名7～10岁，双侧下颌第一恒磨牙无龋坏的儿童。每个儿童随机选取一侧作为试验组，用光固化流体树脂进行窝沟封闭，另一侧为对照组，用传统光固化窝沟封闭剂进行封闭。封闭治疗后6、12、24个月复查，检查封闭剂在牙面的保留率及龋病发生率，并进行统计学分析。结果 2年后试验组光固化流体树脂脱落率和龋病发生率分别为7.80%和2.13%，对照组传统窝沟封闭剂的脱落率和龋病发生率分别为21.43%和7.09%，两组封闭剂脱落率和龋病发生率均有显著性差异（P<0.05）。结论光固化流体树脂在窝沟封闭预防龋坏治疗效果确切，值得临床推广。

关键词: 光固化流体树脂, 第一恒磨牙, 窝沟封闭, 患龋率。

Abstract: ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effect of light-cured flowable resin and traditional light-cured pit and fissure sealant in preventing pit and fissure caries.Methods150 children aged from 7 to 10 years with healthy permanent mandibular first molars were enrolled in this study. One side of permanent mandibular first molar was selected randomly as experimental group, which was sealed with light-cured flowable resin. The other side, as control group, was treated with traditional light-cured pit and fissure sealant. Patients were followed up 6, 12 and 24 months later. The rate of resin loss and incidence of dental caries between two groups were compared by Chi—square test. Results After two years, the rate of sealant loss and the incidence of caries of experimental group (7.8%; 2.13%) were significantly lower than those of the control group(21.43%; 7.09%) (P<0.05).Conclusion Light-cured flowable resin is an effectively anticarious and reliable pit and fissure sealant.

Key words: light-cured flowable resin, the permanent first molar, pit and fissure sealant, incidence of dental caries

中图分类号:

R780.1

韩静于洪波焦菲菲. 光固化流体树脂窝沟封闭防龋疗效的评价[J]. , 2016, 36(2): 132-134.

参考文献

[1] 郑丽纯,龚玲,计艳,等. 南京市6～9岁儿童第一恒磨牙龋病流行病学调查分析[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志，2013，12：788-790.
[2] 冯敏杰，蔡鸿丹. 第一恒磨牙龋病1322名小学生调查分析[J]. 现代医药卫生，2013，02：178-179.
[3] 卞金有，预防口腔医学[M]. 第5版. 北京：人民卫生出版社，2008：166-167.
[4]方达峰,陈燕娟,陈瑶,等.杭州市实施中小学生窝沟封闭项目的封闭率及影响因素调查[J].上海口腔医学,2014,23(1):95-98.
[5] Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yaman BC, et al. Clinical comparison of a flowabke composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study [J]. J Dentistry, 2014,42(2):149-157.
[6] 樊明文,牙体牙髓病学[M]. 第4版. 北京：人民卫生出版社，2012：50-51.
[7] 魏索媚.窝沟封闭预防儿童龋病1000例的临床观察[J]. 上海预防医学，2015,27（3）：153-154.
[8]张敏,彭杰,谢霓,等.窝沟封闭术预防儿童龋病效果的Meta分析[J]. 口腔医学研究，2014,30（9）：891-894.
[9] Beun S, Bailly C, Devaux J, et al. Rheological properties of flowable resin composites and pit and fissure sealants[J]. Dent Mater, 2008，24(4)：548-555.
[10] 曾晓莉，石四箴. 窝沟封闭技术研究进展[J]. 上海医学，2005，03：255-257.
[11] Jang JH, Park SH, Hwang IN. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of bulk-fill resin composites and highly filled flowable resin [J]. Oper Dent, 2015,40(2):172-180.
[12] Paris S, Lausch J, Seljie T, et al. Comparison of sealant and infiltrant penetration into pit and fissure caries lesions in vitro [J]. J Dentistry, 2014,42(4)：432-438.
[13]Beauchamp J, Caufield PW, Crall JJ, et al. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: a report of the American dental association council on scientific affairs [J]. Dental Clinic North America, 2009,53(1):131-147.
[14] Beun S, Bailly C, Devaux J, et al. Rheological properties of flowable resin composites and pit and fissure sealants [J]. Dental Materials, 2008,24(4):548-555.
[15] Dorantes C，Childers NK，Makllija SK，et al. Assentment of retention rates and clinical benefits of a community sealment program[J]. Pediatr Dent，2005，27(3)：212-216.
[16]刘怡杰,荣文笙,赵秀兰,等. 两种窝沟封闭剂防龋效果的临床观察[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志，2014,49(4):199-203.
[17]日孜瓦古力?阿木提,刘菁彧,玛依热,等.457例维吾尔族儿童第一恒磨牙窝沟封闭2年疗效分析[J].上海口腔医学，2014,23(2):201-203.