上颌前牙美学区连续多颗牙缺失即刻种植的临床研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析不同牙种植系统上颌美学区即刻种植对种植体周围骨组织吸收的影响，并探讨改良微创“H”形切口在上颌美学区多颗相邻牙即刻种植修复的应用技巧及美学影响因素。方法选取2011年1月—2015年1月在我院口腔科接受牙体种植修复的患者58例，所有患者均在牙槽嵴顶作微创“H”切口，种植体采用潜入式手术。根据患者种植的牙体系统，将患者分为3组：3I组、DIO组、Replace组。随访12个月，观察患者种植体周围骨吸收量、探诊深度及术后龈沟出血指数。根据Miller牙龈边缘组织退缩分类及Jemt牙龈乳头指数，分别观察种植体永久修复12月后牙龈边缘退缩及牙龈乳头状况；根据Albrektsson 种植体成功标准，观察所植入的种植体状况。结果 3组患者的周围骨组织骨吸收量在植入术后6个月均呈稳定的趋势，不同的种植体增长的幅度不同，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），DIO组患者第3个月的骨吸收量显著高于Replace组和3I组，其差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。术后不同时期，3组患者的龈沟出血指数与天然牙相比，6个月时，DIO组患者的龈沟出血指数虽然高于天然牙，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；9、12个月时，3组患者的龈沟出血指数与天然牙差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；术后6个月，3组患者的探诊深度呈稳定的趋势，各个时期3组患者的探诊深度略高于天然牙，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。159颗种植体存留率100%,Miller分类，136颗种植体牙龈边缘无退缩；18颗种植体牙龈边缘I类退缩；5颗种植体牙龈边缘Ⅱ类退缩。种植修复体近远中Jemt牙龈乳头指数均为Ⅱ级以上。结论不同牙种植体系统对美学区多颗相邻牙即刻种植的种植体周围骨组织及软组织均具有较理想的稳定性及美学效果。改良微创“H”形切口为相邻多颗牙即刻种植的应用技巧提供了临床依据，值得临床推广。

关键词: 牙种植体, 即刻种植 , 相邻多牙, 骨组织, 吸收, 美学

Abstract: Abstract: Objectives To analyze the influence of different dental implant systems utilized for immediate implant in maxillary esthetic zone on peri-implant bone resorption, and to investigate the techniques and esthetic factors of applying the improved minimally invasive H-shaped notch to the immediate implant of multiple adjacent teeth in maxillary anterior esthetic zone. Methods 58 patients who were subjected to dental implantation and restoration from January 2011 to January 2015 were included in the study. The improved minimally invasive H-shaped notch was used in all the patients. Based on the implanted dental systems, they were divided into three groups: group 3I, group DIO, and group Replace. The follow-up time was 12 months, during which their peri-implant bone resorption, probing depth, and sulcus bleeding index after surgery were observed. The gingival marginal tissue recessions were analyzed according to Miller’s classification and interproximal papillae was analyzed according to Jemt’s classification. The stability of the implants was analyzed according to Albrektsson’s criteria of success. Results Six months after surgery, the peri-implant bone resorption of patients in all groups was stable, showing no significant differences among different dental implant systems (P>0.05), but the peri-implant bone resorption of different dental implants increased differently that the bone resorption of group DIO in the 3rd month was evidently higher than that of group Replace and group 3I, which was statistically significant (P<0.05). During different postoperative periods, the sulcus bleeding index of the patients in all groups was compared with natural teeth. In the 6th month, though the sulcus bleeding index in group DIO was higher than natural teeth, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05); in 9th and 12th months, compared with natural teeth, the differences of sulcus bleeding index were still not statistically significant (P>0.05). six months after surg-ery, the probing depth in all the groups was stable and was slightly higher than natural teeth at various periods, but the difference was not significantly significant (P>0.05). The success rate of 159 implants was 100%. No marginal tissue recessions were found in 136 implant sites. The marginal tissue recession index scores of Ⅰ were observed in 18 implant sites, the tissue recession index scores of Ⅱ in 5 implant sites. The mesial and distal papilla index scores of all implant sites were above Ⅱ. Conclusion In the immediate implant of multiple adjacent teeth in esthetic zone, different dental implant systems have both stable and aesthetic effects on the periimplant bone and soft tissues. The improved minimally invasive Hshaped notch can provide the clinical basis for implantation in maxillary esthetic zone.

Key words: dental implants, immediate implant placement, multiple adjacent teeth, bone tissues, resorption, aesthetics

中图分类号:

R783.4

祝岩万澎波邵元霞魏抗抗刘军祥赵伟刘宇飞. 上颌前牙美学区连续多颗牙缺失即刻种植的临床研究[J]. , 2016, 36(8): 700-705.

参考文献

[1]Javed F， Al-Hezaimi K,Salameh Z.Proiflammatory cytokines in the crevicular fluid of patients with peri-implantitis[J].Cytokine,2011,53(6):8-12
[2]徐安臣，杨德圣，顾晓明.非埋入式种植体术后早期与种植体周软硬组织的关系[[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2009,10(3):150-153
[3]李友伟,吕俊良,郁雪松,龚媛媛,骆琳.牙种植体系统对种植体周骨吸收影响的临床评价[J].激光杂志,2012,33(5):75-76
[4]Canullo L， Fedele GR， Iannello G， et al.Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations： the results of a randomized-controlled trial[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2010,21(1):115-121
[5] 张德贵.生物功能牙种植体表面构建与临床研究[D].华南理工大学,2014
[6]Miller PD Jr.A classification of marginal t2 recesson[J].Int Perodntics Restorative Dent,1985,5(2):8-13
[7]Jemt T.Regeneration of gingival papillae after single implant treament[J].Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,1997,17(4):326-333
[8]Schropp L，Wenzel A，Kostopoulos L，et al.Bone healing and soft t4 contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study[J].Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,2003,23(4):313-323
[9]Hiroya S.An application of dental implant on alveolar bone defectcaused by injury an esthetic recovery of anterior teeth region without a bone grafting[J].Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi,2005,49(3):510-511
[10]Douglass GL,Merin RL.The immediate dental implant[J].J Calif Dent Assoc,2002,30(5):362-365
[11]马兆峰，宋应亮，朱文忠，等.前牙种植体即刻种植修复牙龈软组织指标观察[J].口腔医学,2005,25(1):32-34
[12]Basa S,VarolA,Turker N.Alternative bone expansion technique for immediate placementof implants in the edentulousp-osteriormandibular ridge: a clinical report[J][J].IntJ Oral Maxillofac Implants,2004,19(4):554-558
[13]夏海斌，余玲梅.即刻种植的软组织处理技术[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2012,5(4):206-209
[14]罗志宾，罗智斌，曾融生，等.美学区单牙种植体周软组织美学疗效及患者主观满意度研究[J] .中国口腔种植学杂志，2011，16 (3) 163-170
[15]王柏翔,孟维艳,周延民,等.不同种植系统对种植体周组织影响的对比研究[J].口腔医学研究,2014,30(6):540-543
[16]Sorsal T,Hernandez M,Leppilahti J.Detection of gingival crevicularfluid MMP-8 levels with different laboratory and chair-side methods[J].Oral Diseases,2010,7(16):39-45
[17]赵青亮,刘向岩,王语声,等.Osstell Mentor评价OSSTEM-TSⅢ种植体骨结合效果的临床观察[J].中国医疗美容,2015,12(4):117-120
[18]宋应亮,李德华,刘宝林.牙种植体骨结合的再认识与特殊病例分析[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2009,9(11):646-650
[19]吴亚霖,罗智斌,庄秀妹,等.不同连接方式种植体对周围组织影响的临床比较[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志电子版,2014,8(4):301-305