›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 65-68.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

唾液腺黏液表皮样癌的预后及影响因素分析

罗佳1,杨森2   

  1. 1. 遂宁市中心医院
    2. 四川省遂宁市中心医院口腔科
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-01 修回日期:2016-07-21 出版日期:2017-01-28 发布日期:2017-01-17
  • 通讯作者: 罗佳 E-mail:chenyan201304@126.com

Analysis of prognosis and influencing factors of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary gland

  • Received:2016-06-01 Revised:2016-07-21 Online:2017-01-28 Published:2017-01-17

摘要: 目的 分析唾液腺黏液表皮样癌患者术后预后情况,并探讨影响其预后的主要临床和病理因素。方法 回顾性收集2001年1月—2016年2月在我院行手术治疗的78例唾液腺黏液表皮样癌患者的临床和病理资料,采用KaplanMeier法估算术后3、5、10年的生存率,采用Logrank对数秩检验比较组间生存率差异,采用Cox比例风险回归模型进行多因素分析。结果 ①预后情况:78例唾液腺黏液表皮样癌患者术后3、5、10年的总体生存率依次为98.6%、89.6%和73.5%。②单因素分析结果:高分化组、无淋巴结转移组患者术后生存率明显高于中低分化组(Logrank=10.03,P<0.01)、淋巴结转移组患者的值(Logrank=8.57, P=0.01),且差异有统计学意义。③多因素分析结果:分化程度(HR=12.71;P=0.02)和淋巴结转移(HR=6.84; P=0.01)是影响唾液腺黏液表皮样癌患者术后预后的独立危险因素。结论 分化程度、淋巴结转移是影响唾液腺黏液表皮样癌患者术后预后的重要临床、病理因素。对于低分化、淋巴结转移患者应采取综合治疗手段以提高术后预后。

关键词: 唾液腺, 黏液表皮样癌, 预后, 影响因素

Abstract: Objective To analyze the prognosis of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of salivary gland and to explore the clinicopahtological influencing factors. Methods 78 patients with MEC of salivary gland treated with operation in our hospital from January 2001 to February 2016 were retrospectively selected. Related clinicopahtological materials were collected. Postoperative survival rates of 3, 5 and 10 years were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors were analyzed by Log rank tests and Cox regression model. Results (1). The overall survival rates of 3, 5, and 10 years were 98.6%, 89.6% and 73.5% among patients with salivary gland MEC respectively after surgical therapy. (2). Univariate analysis: The overall survival rates of patients with high differentiation and no lymphatic metastasis were statistically significantly higher than those of patients with low differentiation (Log-rank=10.03,P<0.01) and lymphatic metastasis (Log-rank=8.57, P=0.01) respectively. (3). Multivariate analysis: Pathological differentiation (HR=12.71; P=0.02) and lymphatic metastasis (HR=6.84; P=0.01) were the independent clinicopahtological influencing factors among patients with salivary gland MEC after operation. Conclusion Pathological differentiation and lymphatic metastasis are the independent prognostic clinicopathological factors of salivary gland MEC. Comprehensive measures should be taken for patients with poorly differentiation or lymphatic metastasis to improve the postoperative prognosis.

Key words: Salivary gland, Mucoepidermoid carcinoma, Prognosis, Influencing factors.