青少年安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形戴用AdvanSync功能矫治器时颞下颌关节应力分布有限元分析

›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 331-335.

青少年安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形戴用AdvanSync功能矫治器时颞下颌关节应力分布有限元分析

王婧¹,刘海霞¹,刘雁²,吕儒雅²

1. 新疆医科大学第二附属医院口腔科
2. 新疆医科大学第二附属医院

收稿日期:2016-11-25 修回日期:2016-12-26 出版日期:2017-04-28 发布日期:2017-04-11
通讯作者: 刘海霞 E-mail:kqlhx@sina.com

Three dimensional finite element analysis of temporomandibular joint of ClassⅡmalocclusion in adolescent with AdvanSync appliance

¹, ¹,

Received:2016-11-25 Revised:2016-12-26 Online:2017-04-28 Published:2017-04-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的运用三维有限元法分析AdvanSync矫治器在治疗安氏Ⅱ类青少年错牙合畸形时颞下颌关节的应力分布，探讨颞下颌关节能否在局部刺激作用下发生适应性改建。方法选择一名11岁男性的安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合畸形患者为研究志愿者，对其头部行CBCT扫描，通过mimics17等软件建立包含功能矫治器、上颌骨、下颌骨及牙列的3种颌位关系的有限元模型。运用Ansys workbench 15软件对有限元模型进行边界约束，对功能矫治器加载5.7 N的载荷力并进行应力数据分析，观察颞下颌关节应力分布情况。结果建立含有AdvanSync功能矫治器的三维模型；当功能矫治器承受加载力时，颞下颌关节左右侧应力分布基本一致，3种颌位应力值略有差别，应力变化主要表现在髁突。最大主应力集中在髁突颈部、髁突软骨前部，关节盘上腔前带；最小主应力主要集中在髁突顶部，髁突软骨顶部。结论 AdvanSync功能矫治器前导下颌时，髁突及髁突软骨受应力的良性刺激是关节发生适应性改建的基础；关节盘与关节窝受应力影响较小。

关键词: 颞下颌关节, 错牙合畸形, 有限元分析, 应力, AdvanSync

Abstract: Objective Three dimensional finite element method analysis is used in stress analysis of the temporomandibular joint in patient under treatment of junior classⅡmalocclusion with AdvanSync appliance to explore whether the temporomandibular joint has adaptive remodeling under localized stimulus. Methods An 11yearold classⅡDivision 1 malocclusion patient was selected as a volunteer in this research. CBCT was used in scanning the head of the patient. And the data was output as graphic data， which was established into threedimensional finite element model of appliances maxilla mandible and dentition by mimics17.0 software. ANSYS workbench 15.0 software was used in threedimensional model boundary and loading force valued 5.7 N， and making the stress analysis of the temporomandibular joint. Results Threedimensional model of AdvanSync functional appliances was established. When the appliance was leaded force，the left side and the right side of the temporomandibular joint stress distribution were basically the same. Equivalent stress mainly concentrated in front of the condylar slope near the neck of condyle， condylar cartilage，， and articular disc cavity. The maximum principal stress distribution of equivalent stress analysis results were basically the same， mainly bear tensile force; the minimum principal stress mainly concentrated on the top of condyle and condylar cartilage at the top， which is mainly bear compressive stress. Conclusion When AdvanSync functional appliance leads submaxila forward， condylar process and condylar chondrocyte have the adaptive trend under pressure. But articular disc and fossa have little effect.

Key words: temporomandibular joint, malocclusion, finite element analysis, stress, AdvanSync

中图分类号:

R783.5

王婧刘海霞刘雁吕儒雅. 青少年安氏Ⅱ类错牙合畸形戴用AdvanSync功能矫治器时颞下颌关节应力分布有限元分析[J]. , 2017, 37(4): 331-335.

参考文献

[1] 傅民魁,主编.口腔正畸学.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:31-3.
[2] Thikriat S Al-Jewair, Charles B Preston.A comparison of the MARA and the AdvanSync
functional appliances in the treatment of ClassⅡmalocclusion [J]. Angle Othodon.2012,
82(5): 907-914.
[3] 柴召午,李丽华,宋锦璘, 等. 推杆式矫治器前导下颌三维有限元模型的初步构建及分析[J].中华口腔医学杂志, 2009, 44(5): 293-296.
[4] 周子凌,张渊,石利强, 等. 咬合接触对颞下颌关节应力分布影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2015, 50(5): 302-306.
[5] Raed H Alrbataa, Moath Q Momanib, Ahmad M Al-Tarawnehc, et al. Optimal force magnitude loaded to orthodontic microimplants: A finite element analysis[J]. Angle Orthod, 2016, 86(2): 221-226.
[6] Abhinav Shrivastava, Pushpa V Hazarey, Om P Kharbanda, et al. Stress distribution in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular protraction: A three-dimendional finite element study[J]. Angle Orthod, 2015, 85(2): 196-205.
[7]Thikriat S Al-Jewair, Charles B Preston.A comparison of the MARA and the AdvanSync
functional appliances in the treatment of ClassⅡmalocclusion [J]. Angle Othod.2012,
82(5): 907-914.
[8] 麦理想,姚宇,张晟, 等. Twin-block和Ⅱ类牵引矫治青少年安氏Ⅱ类1分类错合下颌后缩
患者颞下颌关节的变化[J].中华口腔医学杂志, 2014, 49(7): 394-398.
[9] 李晨,李永刚,冯雪, 等骨性Ⅱ类高角成年女性颞下颌关节骨性结构的三维研究[J].实用口
腔医学杂志, 2014, 49(7): 394-398.
[10] 田晓光,段银钟,张士杰, 等. 骨性后缩青年下颌前伸引导过程中颞下颌关节的MRI所见
[J].实用医药杂志, 2014, 31(2): 104-106.
[11]Siara-Olds NJ, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Bayirli B. Long-term dentoskeletal changes
with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin-Block, and MARA functional appliances [J]. Angle Orthod.
2010;80(7):18–29.
[12]王娜娜,曹丛,刘东旭. 前方牵引矫治前牙反合后下颌位置的变化[J].山东大学学报（医学版）, 2013,51(09): 95-99.
[13]田晓光,段银钟,吴子忠,等. Forsus矫治器治疗骨性下颌后缩年轻成人颞下颌关节的磁共振研究[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2013,23(11):717-720.

[1]	白露张丽丽吴琳. 咬合板对颞下颌关节紊乱病相关颌面部疼痛的影响[J]. , 2019, 39(5): 472-476.
[2]	蒋煜彬顾卫平陈岗童丽. 紧咬型磨牙对后牙游离端种植体周围骨组织应力分布的有限元研究[J]. , 2019, 39(5): 409-413.
[3]	闻悦王琛张平张静露. 咀嚼肌疼痛患者的定量感觉功能研究[J]. , 2019, 39(5): 414-417.
[4]	贾文远王宇李继华. 特发性髁突吸收及继发颌骨畸形的研究进展[J]. , 2019, 39(2): 175-178.
[5]	石涛郭英李阳邢文忠李振春. 稳定牙合垫治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的疗效分析[J]. , 2019, 39(2): 144-147.
[6]	张玺顾郁嘉王林于剑南赵春洋. 成人下颌偏斜伴颞下颌关节紊乱病的正畸治疗[J]. , 2018, 38(5): 453-456.
[7]	邢斌. 托槽转矩对上颌前牙整体内收影响的三维有限元分析[J]. , 2018, 38(5): 440-444.
[8]	许海军刘海光邱利华潘冬梅梅予锋. 两种球帽附着体放置方式对不同冠根比基牙的有限元分析[J]. , 2018, 38(4): 305-309.
[9]	李国威邓天阁薛洋刘平胡开进. 翼外肌在创伤性颞下颌关节强直中的作用机制研究[J]. , 2018, 38(3): 211-216.
[10]	孙芬刘铭刘名燕. 牵引力介导MC3T3-E1细胞microRNA的差异表达[J]. , 2018, 38(3): 222-226.
[11]	易文静王会会张勤. Wilson曲线与颞下颌关节紊乱病的相关性研究进展[J]. , 2018, 38(2): 181-184.
[12]	乔青芳张君王旭霞刘端芹李涛. 双颌正颌手术治疗严重骨性Ⅲ类错牙合面部硬组织变化的研究[J]. , 2018, 38(10): 908-911.
[13]	苑芳连刘志杰张苗苗陈立艳. 个别正常牙合与骨性Ⅲ类错牙合颞下颌关节的CBCT对比分析[J]. , 2017, 37(8): 707-711.
[14]	蒋雪婷刘红彦. 高角骨性II类错牙合患者的发育特点及治疗对策[J]. , 2017, 37(7): 664-667.
[15]	刘雁刘海霞王婧王为. Advansync功能矫治器在多颌位下前导下颌的有限元分析[J]. , 2017, 37(5): 439-443.