›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 294-298.

• 基础与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

颧种植体相关骨性解剖因素及其增龄性变化

浦丽飞1,汤春波1,王东苗2,吴煜农3   

  1. 1. 江苏省口腔医院
    2. 南京医科大学附属口腔医院口腔颌面外科
    3. 南京医科大学口腔医学院
  • 收稿日期:2012-10-29 修回日期:2012-11-29 出版日期:2013-05-28 发布日期:2013-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 浦丽飞 E-mail:plf411@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目

Age-related changes and osseous anatomy factors related to zygomatic implants

Li-Fei PU 2,Dong-Miao WANG3,   

  • Received:2012-10-29 Revised:2012-11-29 Online:2013-05-28 Published:2013-06-20
  • Contact: Li-Fei PU E-mail:plf411@163.com

摘要: 目的 观测颧种植体植入角度及植入区骨厚度的增龄性变化。方法 按条件随机选取150例患者,根据年龄将患者分为建牙合 、成年、老年3组,老年组又分为有牙颌及无牙颌2组。每位患者行锥体束CT(cone beam computed tomography,CBCT)三维重建,所得数据导入SimPlan软件。模拟经典的颧上颌种植体植入手术,将植体通过骨区域三等分,测量等分点颧骨及上颌骨的厚度及植入方向与冠状、矢状及横断面间的角度。结果 ①植体通过区域3年龄组的各等分点平均颧上颌骨厚度分别为(6.62±0.14)mm、(8.35±0.27)mm、(9.06±0.23)mm,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),有牙颌与无牙颌为(8.82±1.97)mm、(9.37±1.78)mm,差别无统计学意义。②植入角度年龄组组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。③性别因素在各组间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 经典颧种植体术式中,植体通过区域颧骨厚度是随着年龄增长增厚的,并能为颧种植提供足够骨支持。

关键词: 颧种植, CBCT, 植入区骨厚度, 增龄性变化, zygomatic implant, Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), bone thickness, aging changes

Abstract: Objective To observe the age-related changes of bone thickness in implant area and insertion direction of zygomatic implants. Methods A total of 150 eligible cases chosen randomly were scanned with CBCT system. All the cases were divided into three groups, defined as occlusion established group, adult group and elderly group by age. With 3-dimensional (3D) images processed by SimPlant, simulate classic zygomatic implant installing operatetion, and bone region with implant in was equally divided into three parts. Zygomatic and maxillary thickness was obtained on the four equant points. Angular between installing direction and plane Md, CR and FH were measured. Results The mean thickness of maxilla and zygoma in implatation region on each equant point in the three age groups was (6.62±0.14)mm, (8.35±0.27)mm, (9.06±0.23)mm respectively, and there were significant differences among the three groups (P<0.05), while that in dentate and edentulous subgroup was (8.82±1.97)mm、(9.37±1.78)mm respectively with no statistically significant difference. There was significant difference among different age groups in installing direction(P<0.05).Gender was not a significant factor(P>0.05). Conclusion Bone thickness in implatation region increases with age in classic zygomatic implant method, and zygoma could give a sufficient support for implantation.

中图分类号: