不同粘结剂对两种椅旁CAD/CAM全瓷材料粘结强度影响的实验研究

›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 792-795.

不同粘结剂对两种椅旁CAD/CAM全瓷材料粘结强度影响的实验研究

李娟¹,章非敏²,胡建²

1. 连云港市第二人民医院
2. 南京医科大学口腔医学院

收稿日期:2020-03-21 修回日期:2020-05-26 出版日期:2020-09-28 发布日期:2020-10-07
通讯作者: 章非敏 E-mail:fmzhang@njmu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划;江苏省高校优势学科建设工程资助项目

Study of the Effects of Different Adhesives on the Bond Strength of Two Kinds of CAD / CAM All-ceramic Materials

¹, jian HU

Received:2020-03-21 Revised:2020-05-26 Online:2020-09-28 Published:2020-10-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究不同粘结剂及老化处理方式对椅旁CAD/CAM全瓷材料Vita Enamic及Vitablocs MarkⅡ粘结强度的影响。方法将制备好的Vita Enamic（实验组）、Vitablocs MarkⅡ（对照组）试件随机分组（每组60个），分别应用3种常用树脂粘结材料(Panavia F、RelyX Veneer和RelyX Unicem)，与离体牙（共计120颗）粘结，再随机分为冷热循环组和37 ℃水浴组进行老化处理。最后使用万能材料试验机测试每组粘结强度，并进行统计分析。结果 ①冷热循环组同种粘结剂与对应同种试件之间的粘结强度值较37 ℃水浴组低（P＜0.05）；②在37 ℃水浴及冷热循环条件下，三种粘结剂对于Vitablocs MarkⅡ及Vita Enamic的粘结强度均为Panavia F＞RelyX Veneer＞RelyX Unicem（P＜0.05）；③而三种粘结剂对Vitablocs MarkⅡ的粘结强度均高于Vita Enamic（P＜0.05）。结论冷热循环老化试验可以降低三种粘结剂对两种瓷材料的粘结力。对于椅旁CAD/CAM全瓷材料，Panavia F可以获得更为理想的粘结强度。相较于Vita Enamic，Vitablocs MarkⅡ的粘结强度更高。

关键词: 椅旁可切削陶瓷, 树脂粘结剂, 粘结强度

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effects of different adhesives and aging treatments on the bonding strength of two kinds of CAD / CAM all-ceramic materials. Methods The prepared Vita Enamic (experimental group) and Vitablocs Mark II (control group) specimens were randomly divided into groups (60 in each group), and three commonly used resin bonding materials (Panavia F, RelyX Veneer, and RelyX Unicem) were applied respectively. Body teeth (120 in total) were bonded, and they were randomly divided into a thermal-cold cycling group and a 37 ℃ water bath group for aging treatment. Finally, a universal material testing machine was used to test the bonding strength of each group, and statistical analysis was performed. Results 1) The bonding strength between the same kind of adhesive and the corresponding test specimen in the thermal-cold cycling group was lower than that in the 37 ℃ water bath group (P<0.05); 2) Under both conditions of 37 ℃ water bath and thermal-cold cycling, the bonding strength of each adhesive to Vitablocs MarkⅡ and Vita Enamic was Panavia F＞RelyX Veneer＞RelyX Unicem (P＜0.05); 3) The bonding strength of all three adhesives to Vitablocs MarkⅡ was higher than Vita Enamic (p <0.05). Conclusion The thermal-cold cycling aging treatment can reduce the adhesion of three kinds of adhesives to two kinds of porcelain materials. Panavia F can obtain higher bonding strength for CAD / CAM all-ceramic materials. Compared to Vita Enamic, Vitablocs MarkⅡ has higher bonding strength.

Key words: machinable ceramics, resin cement, bond strength

中图分类号:

李娟章非敏胡建. 不同粘结剂对两种椅旁CAD/CAM全瓷材料粘结强度影响的实验研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2020, 40(9): 792-795.

jian HU. Study of the Effects of Different Adhesives on the Bond Strength of Two Kinds of CAD / CAM All-ceramic Materials[J]. Stomatology, 2020, 40(9): 792-795.

参考文献 16

[1]	刘丽杨，郭佳杰，杜亚鑫，王强，仇丽鸿. 3种可切削树脂陶瓷复合材料机械性能比较[J]. 上海口腔医学.2019,28(1):25-29.
[2]	刘丽杨，郭佳杰，王强，米婧，仇丽鸿. 氢氟酸酸蚀对两种树脂-陶瓷复合材料黏结强度影响研究[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志.2019,12(1):42-46.
[3]	陈温霞,林捷.3种可切削树脂陶瓷复合材料机械性能比较[J].上海口腔医学.2019, 28(1):25-29.
[4]	Gratis S,Thompson VP,Ferencz JL,et a1.A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-Iike restorative materials [J].Int J Prosthodont,2015,28(3):227-235.
[5]	Wendler M,BeIlj R,Petscheh A,et al.Chairside CAD/CAM materials．Part 2：Flexural strength testing[J]．Dent Mater，2017，33(1)：99-109.
[6]	Lawson NC,Bansal R,Burgess JO.Wear,strength,modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials[J/CD]．Dent Mater,2016,32(11):275-283.
[7]	Curran P,Cattani--Lorente M,Anselm Wiskott HW,et a1.Grinding damage assessment for CAD/CAM restorative materials[J]．Dent Mater,2017,33(3)：294-308.
[8]	Flury S,Schmidt SZ,Peutzfeldt A,et a1.Dentin bond strength of two resin-ceramic computer-aided design/compurer-aided manufacturing(CAD/CAM)materials and five cements after six months storage[J].Dent Mater J,2016,35(5):728-735.
[9]	Peumans M,Valjakova EB,De Munck J,et a1.Bonding effectiveness of luting composites to different CAD/CAM materials[J]．J Adhes Dent.2016,18(4): 289-302.
[10]	Stawarczyk B,Krawczuk A,llie N.Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD／CAM resin nanoceramic[J].Clin Oral Investig.2015,19(2):299-308.
[11]	de Carvalho RF, Cotes C, Kimpara ET, Leite FP, ?zcan M. Heat treatment of pre-hydrolyzed silane increases adhesion of phosphate monomer-based resin cement to glass ceramic[J]. Braz Dent J. 2015 Jan-Feb;26(1):44-9.
[12]	Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Züchner H, Sch?fer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites--a comparative study[J]. Dent Mater. 2006 Oct;22(10):934-41.
[13]	冷鑫,朱松.口腔修复材料人工老化方法口腔医学研究[J].口腔医学研究.2011, 27(10): 926-927.
[14]	Omastova M,Podhradska S,Prokes J,et al,Thermal ageing of conducting polymeric composites[J]. Polym Degrad Stabil.2003,82 (2): 251-256.
[15]	De Munck J,Van Landuyt K,Coutinho E,et al.Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermos-cycling[J]. Dent Mater. 2005, 21(11): 999-1007.
[16]	陈曦,章非敏,胡建.两种不同厚度椅旁CAD/CAM全瓷材料断裂强度的实验研究.[J]南京医科大学学报(自然科学版).2015, 35(11):1632-1636.