下颌后牙区骨皮质厚度对牙种植精度的影响

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.08.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨下颌后牙区局部骨皮质厚度(cortical bone thickness,CBT)对牙种植精度的影响。方法纳入2020年6—12月间就诊于中国科学技术大学附属第一医院口腔医学中心的下颌后牙区牙种植患者30例,平均年龄43.1岁,共植入种植体37枚。于术后CBCT中测量种植体颈部颊、舌侧CBT并计算均值,将均值分为两组(A组为CBT≥1.5 mm;B组为CBT＜1.5 mm)并分析各种植体植入顶点、末端及角度偏差。结果 CBT≥1.5 mm组的牙种植精度在植入顶点、植入末端及植入角度方面均优于CBT＜1.5 mm组(P<0.05)。结论种植区骨皮质厚度较低时,牙种植精度可能降低,因此临床上对于此类患者应更加谨慎对待。

关键词: 锥形束CT, 骨皮质厚度, 牙种植, 动态导航, 精度

Abstract: Objective To investigate the influence of cortical bone thickness (CBT) in mandibular posterior region on dental implantation accuracy. Methods A total of 30 patients at an average age of 43.1 with 37 implants in mandibular posterior dental area who were admitted to Stomatology Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China from June to December 2020 were included. CBT of bone in the implant area was measured in postoperative CBCT, and implants were divided into two groups according to CBT (group A, CBT≥1.5 mm; group B, CBT<1.5 mm). The deviation of implantations in the implant neck and apex as well as the angular errors were analyzed with precision verification software. Results The implant accuracy of CBT≥1.5 mm group was better than that of CBT<1.5 mm group in terms of implant point, implant end and implant angle (P<0.05). Conclusion When the thickness of bone cortex in the proposed planting area is low, precision of dental implantation may be reduced. Therefore, such patients should be treated with more caution in clinical practice.

Key words: cone-beam CT, cortical bone thickness, tooth implant, dynamic navigation, accuracy

中图分类号:

R783.4

陈雨妍, 张志宏, 刘红红, 韩倩, 陈佳, 段琳娜. 下颌后牙区骨皮质厚度对牙种植精度的影响[J]. 口腔医学, 2022, 42(8): 713-716.

CHEN Yuyan, ZHANG Zhihong, LIU Honghong, HAN Qian, CHEN Jia, DUAN Linna. Influence of cortical bone thickness in mandibular posterior region on the accuracy of implantation[J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(8): 713-716.

参考文献

[1] 陈琳, 魏凌飞, 陈泉林, 等. 计算机辅助动态导航技术在口腔种植手术中的应用[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2020, 36(3):477-481.
[2] Smitkarn P, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N,et al. The accuracy of single-tooth implants placed using fully digital-guided surgery and freehand implant surgery[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019, 46(9):949-957.
[3] Wu D, Zhou L, Yang J,et al. Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2020, 6(1):78.
[4] 汪饶开卷, 吕平, 姚洋. 数字化口腔种植导航的精确性评价[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2019, 35(6):380-383.
[5] 苏恩典, 陈莹晖, 杨松, 等. 即刻与延期种植导航手术的术者操作误差分析[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2020, 36(11):673-676.
[6] Derksen W, Wismeijer D,Flügge T, et al. The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning: A prospective cohort study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019, 30(10):1005-1015.
[7] 陈雨妍, 张志宏, 刘红红, 等. 锥形束CT用于后牙区骨皮质厚度分析的可行性研究[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2021, 56(11):1080-1084.
[8] Suttapreyasri S, Suapear P, Leepong N. Theaccuracy of cone-beam computed tomography for evaluating bone density and cortical bone thickness at the implant site:Micro-computed tomography and histologic analysis[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2018, 29(8):2026-2031.
[9] Sugiura T, Yamamoto K, Kawakami M, et al. Influence of bone parameters on peri-implant bone strain distribution in the posterior mandible[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2015, 20(1):e66-e73.
[10] Putra RH, Yoda N, Iikubo M, et al. Influence of bone condition on implant placement accuracy with computer-guided surgery[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2020, 6(1):62.
[11] Zhou WJ, Liu ZH, Song LS, et al. Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of guided implant surgery-A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Evid Based Dent Pract, 2018, 18(1):28-40.
[12] Erbay Elibol FK, Oflaz E, Buğra E, et al. Effect of cortical bone thickness and density on pullout strength of mini-implants:An experimental study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2020, 157(2):178-185.
[13] 陈泉林, 许胜, 周文娟, 等. 计算机辅助动态导航技术在种植手术中的临床精度影响因素分析[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2021, 26(2):85-90.
[14] Yeung M, Abdulmajeed A, Carrico CK, et al. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems:An in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020, 123(6):821-828.
[15] Wei SM, Zhu Y, Wei JX, et al. Accuracy of dynamic navigation in implant surgery:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2021, 32(4):383-393.
[16] Edelmann C, Wetzel M, Knipper A, et al. Accuracy of computer-assisted dynamic navigation in implant placement with a fully digital approach:A prospective clinical trial[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(9):1808.
[17] Demetoglu U, Bilge S, Aslan S, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of pilot-drill-guided and fully guided implant surgery with dynamic navigation: in vitro model study[J/OL]. J Oral Implantol, (2021-11-26)[2022-02-01].doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00383.
[18] Block MS, Emery RW, Cullum DR, et al. Implant placement is more accurate using dynamic navigation[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 75(7):1377-1386.
[19] Bishop ES, Hall JL, Handel I, et al. Sequential drilling and drill angulation reduce the accuracy of drill hole start location in a synthetic bone model[J]. Vet Rec, 2019, 184(12):383.
[20] Aydemir CA, Ar\u0131san V. Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method:A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020, 31(3):255-263.
[21] Domic D, Bertl K, Ahmad S,et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography is limited at implant sites with a thin buccal bone:A laboratory study[J]. J Periodontol, 2021, 92(4):592-601.
[22] Block MS, Emery RW, Lank K, et al. Implant placement accuracy using dynamic navigation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017, 32(1):92-99.
[23] 陶宝鑫, 王凤, 沈意涵, 等. 动态导航技术辅助双侧双颧种植的精度分析及临床效果评估[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2020, 55(11):845-850.
[24] Kuo PJ, Lin CY, Hung TF, et al. A novel application of dynamic guided navigation system in immediate implant placement[J]. J Dent Sci, 2022, 17(1):354-360.