从上部修复体设计谈种植体周围炎的预防

Abstract

Abstract: Peri-implantitis significantly decrease hinders the long-term success of implant therapy. Several factors, such as the material and profile of the prosthesis transmucosal area, the fit of implant-abutment interface, the configuration and hygiene access design of the prosthesis, and the way of restoration retention, may obstruct plaque control around the implant and increase the risks of peri-implantitis. Therefore, proper prosthetic design may reduce or prevent the prevalence of peri-implantitis.

Key words: prosthetic design, plaque control, peri-implantitis

CLC Number:

R783.4

References 60

[1]	Lee CT, Huang YW, Zhu L, et al.Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis: Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Dent, 2017, 62: 1-12.
[2]	Derks J, Tomasi C.Peri-implant health and diseaseA systematic review of current epidemiology[J].J Clin Periodontol, 2015, 42(Suppl 16):S158-S171
[3]	Caton J G, Armitage G, Berglundh T, et al.A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions - Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification[J].J Periodontol, 2018, 89(Suppl 1):S1-S8
[4]	Wang YL, Zhang YF, Miron RJ.Health,maintenance,and recovery of soft tissues around implants[J].Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2016, 18(3):618-634
[5]	Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, et al.The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 1991, 2(2):81-90
[6]	Moon IS, Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, et al.The barrier between the keratinized mucosa and the dental implantAn experimental study in the dog[J].J Clin Periodontol, 1999, 26(10):658-663
[7]	Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Jonsson K, et al.The topography of the vascular systems in the periodontal and peri-implant tissues in the dog[J].J Clin Periodontol, 1994, 21(3):189-193
[8]	Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz PO, et al.The mucosal attachment at different abutmentsAn experimental study in dogs[J].J Clin Periodontol, 1998, 25(9):721-727
[9]	Linkevicius T, Vaitelis J.The effect of zirconia or titanium as abutment material on soft peri-implant tissues: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(Suppl 11):139-147
[10]	Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T.The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(7):635-641
[11]	Hu ML, Chen JY, Pei XB, et al.Network meta-analysis of survival rate and complications in implant-supported single crowns with different abutment materials[J]. J Dent, 2019, 88: 103115.
[12]	Rimondini L, Cerroni L, Carrassi A, et al.Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: An in vitro and in vivo study[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2002, 17(6):793-798
[13]	Schwitalla A, Müller WD.PEEK dental implants: A review of the literature[J].J Oral Implantol, 2013, 39(6):743-749
[14]	Agustín-Panadero R, Serra-Pastor B, Roig-Vanaclocha A, et al.Mechanical behavior of provisional implant prosthetic abutments[J].Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2015, 20(1):e94-e102
[15]	Brum RS, Labes LG, Volpato C?M, et al.Strategies to reduce biofilm formation in PEEK materials applied to implant dentistry-A comprehensive review[J].Antibiotics (Basel), 2020, 9(9):E609-
[16]	Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al.Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface[J].J Dent Res, 2003, 82(3):232-237
[17]	Mishra SK, Chowdhary R, Kumari S.Microleakage at the different implant abutment interface: A systematic review[J].J Clin Diagn Res, 2017, 11(6):Z-E10
[18]	Zipprich H, Miatke S, Hmaidouch R, et al.A new experimental design for bacterial microleakage investigation at the implant-abutment interface: An in vitro study[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2016, 31(1):37-44
[19]	Zipprich H, Weigl P, Ratka C, et al.The micromechanical behavior of implant-abutment connections under a dynamic load protocol[J].Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018, 20(5):814-823
[20]	Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Güth JF, et al.Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: A comparative in vitro study[J].Dent Mater, 2012, 28(12):1215-1220
[21]	Rismanchian M, Hatami M, Badrian H, et al.Evaluation of microgap size and microbial leakage in the connection area of 4 abutments with Straumann (ITI) implant[J].J Oral Implantol, 2012, 38(6):677-685
[22]	Bondan JL, Oshima HMS, Segundo RMH, et al.Marginal fit analysis of premachined and castable UCLA abutments[J].Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana: AOL, 2009, 22(2):139-42
[23]	Souza AB, Alshihri A, K?mmerer PW, et al.Histological and micro-CT analysis of peri-implant soft and hard tissue healing on implants with different healing abutments configurations[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29(10):1007-1015
[24]	Finelle G, Papadimitriou DEV, Souza AB, et al.Peri-implant soft tissue and marginal bone adaptation on implant with non-matching healing abutments: Micro-CT analysis[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(4):e42-e46
[25]	Koutouzis T, Adeinat B, Ali A.The influence of abutment macro-design on clinical and radiographic peri-implant tissue changes for guided,placed,and restored implants: A 1-year randomized controlled trial[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019, 30(9):882-891
[26]	Katafuchi M, Weinstein BF, Leroux BG, et al.Restoration contour is a risk indicator for peri-implantitis: A cross-sectional radiographic analysis[J].J Clin Periodontol, 2018, 45(2):225-232
[27]	Yi Y, Koo KT, Schwarz F, et al.Association of prosthetic features and peri-implantitis: A cross-sectional study[J].J Clin Periodontol, 2020, 47(3):392-403
[28]	Dixon DR, London RM.Restorative design and associated risks for peri-implant diseases[J].Periodontol, 2019, 81(1):167-178
[29]	Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, et al.Biologic width around titanium implantsA histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible[J].J Periodontol, 1997, 68(2):186-198
[30]	Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, et al.Biologic width around titanium implantsA physiologically formed and stable dimension over time[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2000, 11(1):1-11
[31]	Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, et al.Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: An evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans[J].J Periodontol, 2003, 74(4):557-562
[32]	Zhang Z, Shi D, Meng HX, et al.Influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on occurrence of peri-implantitis in patients with periodontitis: A prospective cohort study[J].Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2020, 22(3):292-300
[33]	Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J.The mucosal barrier following abutment disreconnectionAn experimental study in dogs[J].J Clin Periodontol, 1997, 24(8):568-572
[34]	Wang QQ, Dai RX, Cao CY, et al.One-time versus repeated abutment connection for platform-switched implant: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].PLoS One, 2017, 12(10):e0186385-
[35]	Atieh MA, Tawse-Smith A, Alsabeeha NHM, et al.The one abutment-one time protocol: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Periodontol, 2017, 88(11):1173-1185
[36]	Santos JS, Santos TS, Martins-Filho PRS, et al.One abutment at one time concept for platform-switched morse implants: Systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Braz Dent J, 2018, 29(1):7-13
[37]	Serino G, Str?m C.Peri-implantitis in partially edentulous patients: Association with inadequate plaque control[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(2):169-174
[38]	de Tapia B, Mozas C, Valles C, et al.Adjunctive effect of modifying the implant-supported prosthesis in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis[J].J Clin Periodontol, 2019, 46(10):1050-1060
[39]	Pons R, Nart J, Valles C, et al.Self-administered proximal implant-supported hygiene measures and the association to peri-implant conditions[J].J Periodontol, 2021, 92(3):389-399
[40]	Chopra A, Sivaraman K, Narayan AI, et al.Etiology and classification of food impaction around implants and implant-retained prosthesis[J].Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019, 21(2):391-397
[41]	Jeong JS, Chang M.Food impaction and periodontalperi-implant tissue conditions in relation to the embrasure dimensions between implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and adjacent teeth: A cross-sectional study[J].J Periodontol, 2015, 86(12):1314-1320
[42]	Chow YC, Wang HL.Factors and techniques influencing peri-implant papillae[J].Implant Dent, 2010, 19(3):208-219
[43]	Kuoppala R, N?p?nkangas R, Raustia A.Outcome of implant-supported overdenture treatment: A survey of 58 patients[J].Gerodontology, 2012, 29(2):e577-e584
[44]	ELsyad MA, Elgamal M, Mohammed Askar O, et al.Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of conventional denture,fixed prosthesis and milled bar overdenture for All-on-4 implant rehabilitationA crossover study[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019, 30(11):1107-1117
[45]	Baskaradoss JK, Geevarghese A, Baig MR.Peri-implant mucosal response to implant-supported overdentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Gerodontology, 2021, 38(1):27-40
[46]	Wilson TG Jr.The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: A prospective clinical endoscopic study[J].J Periodontol, 2009, 80(9):1388-1392
[47]	Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: A current understanding of their diagnoses and clinical implications[J].J Periodontol, 2013, 84(4): 436-443.
[48]	Heitz-Mayfield LJ.Diagnosis and management of peri-implant diseases[J].Aust Dent J, 2008, 53(Suppl 1):S43-S48
[49]	Liu Y, Wang JW.Influences of microgap and micromotion of implant-abutment interface on marginal bone loss around implant neck[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2017, 83: 153-160.
[50]	Ragauskait? A, ?ekonis G, ?ilinskas J, et al.The comparison of cement- and screw-retained crowns from technical and biological points of view[J].Stomatologija, 2017, 19(2):44-50
[51]	Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, et al.The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant restorations[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(12):1379-1384
[52]	Korsch M, Obst U, Walther W.Cement-associated peri-implantitis: A retrospective clinical observational study of fixed implant-supported restorations using a methacrylate cement[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2014, 25(7):797-802
[53]	Sancho-Puchades M, Crameri D, ?zcan M, et al.The influence of the emergence profile on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant reconstructions[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(12):1515-1522
[54]	Korsch M, Walther W.Peri-implantitis associated with type of cement: A retrospective analysis of different types of cement and their clinical correlation to the peri-implant tissue[J].Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(Suppl 2):e434-e443
[55]	Almehmadi N, Kutkut A, Al-Sabbagh M.What is the best available luting agent for implant prosthesis?[J].Dent Clin North Am, 2019, 63(3):531-545
[56]	Nematollahi F, Beyabanaki E, Alikhasi M.Cement selection for cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: A literature review[J].J Prosthodont, 2016, 25(7):599-606
[57]	Patel D, Invest JC, Tredwin CJ, et al.An analysis of the effect of a vent hole on excess cement expressed at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant crowns[J].J Prosthodont, 2009, 18(1):54-59
[58]	Wang W, Chang J, Wang HM, et al.Effects of precementation on minimizing residual cement around the marginal area of dental implants[J].J Prosthet Dent, 2020, 123(4):622-629
[59]	Dumbrigue HB, Abanomi AA, Cheng LL.Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations[J].J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 87(1):112-114
[60]	Bukhari SA, AlHelal A, Kattadiyil MT, et al.An in vitro investigation comparing methods of minimizing excess luting agent for cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures[J].J Prosthet Dent, 2020, 124(6):706-715

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 60

Related Articles 14

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	. Clinical application of smooth-collared implant [J]. , 2021, 41(8): 746-750.
[2]	. Neither open flap debridement nor bone grafting when “saucer-like” marginal bone loss amounts to 3 mm below the implant shoulder after 1-year functional loading [J]. , 2019, 39(2): 164-166.
[3]	. Flap surgery is required when “saucer-like” marginal bone loss amounted to 3 mm below implant shoulder after 1-year loading [J]. , 2019, 39(2): 161-163.
[4]	. Research progress of animal models of peri-implantitis [J]. , 2018, 38(8): 747-751.
[5]	. Review on photodynamic therapy in treatment of peri-implantitis [J]. , 2018, 38(6): 569-572.
[6]	. Effect of probiotics on common oral diseases [J]. , 2018, 38(2): 185-188.
[7]	. Effect of Er:YAG laser on the treatment of peri-implantitis: A short-term clinical efficacy evaluation [J]. , 2018, 38(12): 1118-1121.
[8]	. Application and research progress of laser on peri-implantitis [J]. , 2017, 37(2): 170-175.
[9]	. Preliminary study of variation of oral microflora after full-mouth tooth extraction [J]. , 2017, 37(11): 1021-1024.
[10]	. Research progress on the treatments regarding peri-implantitis with antimicrobial products [J]. , 2016, 36(5): 462-466.
[11]	. Non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis [J]. , 2016, 36(11): 1040-1043.
[12]	. Changes of Emmprin in gingival crevicular and clinical indexes of implants after occlusal traumas [J]. , 2015, 35(5): 345-348.
[13]	. The clinical effects of different treatments on peri-implantitis [J]. , 2015, 35(3): 205-207.
[14]	. Application of microscopy in the plaque control in fixed orthodontic therapy [J]. , 2014, 34(4): 279-279.