口腔医学 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 312-316.doi: 10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2023.04.005

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

尼妥珠单抗与TPF的联合运用在头颈鳞癌中治疗效果的初步分析

王亚琛1,2,郑旸1,2,杨月美1,2,刘婕1,2,宋晓萌1,2,丁旭1,2(),武和明1,2,吴煜农1,2()   

  1. 1.南京医科大学附属口腔医院口腔颌面外科,江苏南京(210029)
    2.南京医科大学口腔疾病重点实验室,江苏南京(210029)
  • 修回日期:2023-01-02 出版日期:2023-04-28 发布日期:2023-05-08
  • 通讯作者: 丁旭,吴煜农 E-mail:yunongwu@njmu.edu.cn;dingxunj@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81772877);江苏省自然科学基金(BK20171488);江苏省医学创新团队(CXTDA2017036);江苏省科教能力提升工程——江苏省研究型医院(YJXYYJSDW4);江苏省医学创新中心(CXZX202227)

Nimotuzumab combined with TPF chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A preliminary analysis

WANG Yachen1,2,ZHENG Yang1,2,YANG Yuemei1,2,LIU Jie1,2,SONG Xiaomeng1,2,DING Xu1,2(),WU Heming1,2,WU Yunong1,2()   

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Revised:2023-01-02 Online:2023-04-28 Published:2023-05-08
  • Contact: DING Xu,WU Yunong E-mail:yunongwu@njmu.edu.cn;dingxunj@hotmail.com

摘要:

目的 评估尼妥珠单抗联合TPF化疗对比TPF化疗对头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的疗效是否差异,并初步探讨两种方案相互作用的分子机制。方法 本研究为回顾性研究。收集了62例(2016—2021年)在江苏省口腔医院口腔颌面外科病房进行治疗的Ⅲ~ⅣA期头颈鳞状细胞癌患者,其中30例接受TPF化疗方案前接受300 mg尼妥珠单抗静脉滴注,为A组;其余32例为B组,仅接受TPF治疗。此外取B组进行诱导化疗的部分患者化疗前后的组织蜡块,进行免疫组织化学染色,观察EGFR表达量变化。结果 A组和B组的肿瘤有效缓解率分别为78%和43%,两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组和B组的5年总生存率分别为72.2%和36.6%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组和B组的5年无进展生存率分别为 63.8% 和36.2%。A组的5年无进展生存率与B组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。免疫组化染色显示相较B组和单用尼妥珠单抗,A组化疗后EGFR表达量下降更为显著。结论 头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者,接受尼妥珠单抗联合TPF化疗比单纯TPF化疗有更好的疗效。尼妥珠单抗靶向治疗与TPF化疗方案间存在一定的协同作用。

关键词: 尼妥珠单抗, TPF化疗方案, 头颈部鳞状细胞癌, 化疗效果, 人表皮生长因子受体

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the difference between the efficacy of Nimotuzumab combined with TPF chemotherapy and TPF chemotherapy alone in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and to briefly discuss the molecular mechanism of interaction between Nimotuzumaband TPF chemotherapy. Methods This study retrospectively collected 62 patients with stage Ⅲ-ⅣA head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the Stomatological Hospital of Jiangsu Province from 2016 to 2021. Everyone engaged accepted TPF chemotherapy. Thirty patients were given 300 mg dose of Nimotuzumab before the TPF therapy, classified as group A. The rest 32 patients were classified as group B. Tissue wax blocks before and after surgery of patients receiving induction chemotherapy in group B were collected for immunohistochemical staining to observe the expression of EGFR. Results After chemotherapy, the response rate of tumor in group A was 78%, and that in group B was 43%. There was statistically significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05). The five-year overall survival rate of group A and group B was 72.2% and 36.6%, respectively, with statistically significant difference(P<0.05). The progression-free survival rates of group A and group B were 63.8% and 36.2%, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Immunohistochemical staining showed that the expression of EGFR in group A decreased more significantly than that in group B or Nimotuzumab alone. Conclusion In patients with Ⅲ-ⅣA squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, Nimutuzumab combined with TPF chemotherapy provides patients with better efficacy compared with TPF chemotherapy alone. There is probably a synergistic effect between Nimutuzumab and TPF chemotherapy.

Key words: Nimotuzumab, TPF chemotherapy, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, chemotherapeutic efficacy, epidermal growth factor receptor

中图分类号: