数字化间接粘接技术在正畸托槽定位中的应用进展

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2024.03.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

正畸托槽的定位直接影响着矫治结束时牙齿的位置和矫治的最终效果,尤其是现在直丝弓矫治技术盛行,托槽位置的精确定位显得尤为重要。传统间接粘接技术因材料学等因素的限制,在粘接准确性、制作流程上相比与直接粘接无明显优势,所以临床应用有限。随着当今数字化技术的发展,由三维打印技术获得的间接粘接转移托盘使间接粘接技术得到了优化和完善。该文将围绕数字化定位间接粘接技术作一综述,为临床提供参考。

关键词: 间接粘接, 精确性, 托槽, 正畸

Abstract:

The placement of brackets directly influences positions of the teeth and the outcome at the end of orthodontic treatment. The precise placement of brackets is crucial, particularly in these days when the straight wire technique is prevalent. Due to numerous restrictions, including materials, traditional indirect bonding doesn’t have obvious advantages in terms of bonding precision and fabrication procedure over direct bonding, and thus is only occasionally used in clinical practice. With the development of digital technology, the indirect bonding transfer trays produced by 3D printing technology have been optimized and improved. In order to provide references for clinical application, this article reviews the digitally positioned indirect bonding transfer technology.

Key words: indirect bonding, accuracy, bracket, orthodontics

中图分类号:

R783.5

金敏, 陈於茂, 韩旻轩, 陆史俊. 数字化间接粘接技术在正畸托槽定位中的应用进展[J]. 口腔医学, 2024, 44(3): 227-231.

JIN Min, CHEN Yumao, HAN Minxuan, LU Shijun. Application progress of digital indirect bonding technology in orthodontic bracket positioning[J]. Stomatology, 2024, 44(3): 227-231.

参考文献 39

[1]	Silverman E, Cohen M, GianellyAA, et al. A universal direct bonding system for both metal and plastic brackets[J]. Am J Orthod, 1972, 62(3):236-244. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9416(72)90264-3 pmid: 4559001
[2]	Nawrocka A, Lukomska-Szymanska M. The indirect bonding technique in orthodontics-anarrative literature review[J]. Materials, 2020, 13(4):986. doi: 10.3390/ma13040986
[3]	Deahl ST, Salome N, Hatch JP, et al. Practice-based comparison of direct and indirect bonding[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007, 132(6):738-742. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.037
[4]	奚祺, 吴国锋. 数字化口内扫描技术的发展与应用[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2021, 37(1):136-140.
[5]	Tomita Y, Uechi J, Konno M, et al. Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plaster-model methods and intraoral scanning[J]. Dent Mater J, 2018, 37(4):628-633. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2017-208 pmid: 29669951
[6]	李晶, 王硕, 张达, 等. 口内扫描数字化模型与硅橡胶制取石膏模型测量的对比研究[J]. 中华口腔正畸学杂志, 2013, 20(3):163-166.
[7]	Yilmaz H, Eglenen MN. Comparison of the effect of using panoramic and cone-beam computed tomography on the accuracy of root position in indirect digital bracket placement: A retrospective study[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2022, 25(3):401-408. doi: 10.1111/ocr.v25.3
[8]	陈佳君, 薛超然, 王沛棋, 等. 正畸治疗中利用锥形束CT测量牙根位置方法的研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2022, 30(10):740-745. doi: 10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2022.10.009
[9]	林雪芬, 宁楠, 马驰, 等. 偏颌患者虚拟排牙的根骨关系研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2022, 42(3):235-240.
[10]	万贤凤, 张文斌, 章锦才, 等. Damon Q自锁托槽在数字化牙颌模型上的模拟定位研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2015, 33(5):500-503.
[11]	Kawaguchi M, Hayakawa S, Kurosawa M, et al. Application of silicon hybrid transfer trays to an indirect bonding system through bracket positions referred by 3D digital software[J]. Orthod Waves, 2011, 70(3):119-122. doi: 10.1016/j.odw.2011.03.002
[12]	Sondhi A. Efficient and effective indirect bonding[J]. Am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop, 1999, 115(4):352-359.
[13]	Yoo SH, Choi SH, Kim KM, et al. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed bracket transfer tray using an in-office indirect bonding system[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2022, 162(1):93-102.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.025
[14]	von Glasenapp J, Hofmann E, Süpple J, et al. Comparison of two 3D-printed indirect bonding (IDB) tray design versions and their influence on the transfer accuracy[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(5):1295. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051295
[15]	Wang PQ, Li WY, Li B, et al. Comparison of bracket bonding between two CAD/CAM guided bonding devices: GBD-U vs. GBD-B[J]. J Dent, 2023, 131: 104456. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104456
[16]	Xue CR, Xu H, Guo YW, et al. Accurate bracket placement using a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing-guided bonding device: An in vivo study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2020, 157(2):269-277.
[17]	Bakdach WMM, Hadad R. Linear and angular transfer accuracy of labial brackets using three dimensional-printed indirect bonding trays: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int Orthod, 2022, 20(1):100612. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100612
[18]	Niu Y, Zeng YT, Zhang ZY, et al. Comparison of the transfer accuracy of two digital indirect bonding trays for labial bracket bonding[J]. Angle Orthod, 2021, 91(1):67-73. doi: 10.2319/013120-70.1 pmid: 33289807
[19]	Palone M, Koch PJ, Jost-Brinkmann PG, et al. Accuracy of indirect bracket placement with medium-soft, transparent, broad-coverage transfer trays fabricated using computer-aided design and manufacturing: An in-vivo study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2023, 163(1):33-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.08.023
[20]	Higgins DW. Indirect bonding with light-cured adhesive and a hybrid transfer tray[J]. Semin Orthod, 2007, 13(1):64-68. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2006.11.008
[21]	杨椿浩, 李岩峰, 夏冬, 等. 两种3D打印导板在托槽间接粘接中的准确性比较[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志, 2021, 38(7):898-902.
[22]	Hofmann EC, Süpple J, von Glasenapp J, et al. Indirect bonding: An in-vitro comparison of a Polyjet printed versus a conventional silicone transfer tray[J]. Angle Orthod, 2022, 92(6):728-737. doi: 10.2319/122021-925.1 pmid: 35834817
[23]	Grünheid T, Lee MS, Larson BE. Transfer accuracy of vinyl polysiloxane trays for indirect bonding[J]. Angle Orthod, 2016, 86(3):468-474. doi: 10.2319/042415-279.1 pmid: 26355994
[24]	Aboujaoude R, Kmeid R, Gebrael C, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of bracket positioning between direct and digital indirect bonding techniques in the maxillary arch: A three-dimensional study[J]. Prog Orthod, 2022, 23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00426-3 pmid: 36058991
[25]	Zhang Y, Yang CH, Li YF, et al. Comparison of three-dimensional printing guides and double-layer guide plates in accurate bracket placement[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020, 20(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01110-w pmid: 32345292
[26]	Süpple J, von Glasenapp J, Hofmann E, et al. Accurate bracket placement with an indirect bonding method using digitally designed transfer models printed in different orientations-an in vitro study[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(9):2002. doi: 10.3390/jcm10092002
[27]	Kim J, Chun YS, Kim M. Accuracy of bracket positions with a CAD/CAM indirect bonding system in posterior teeth with different cusp heights[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2018, 153(2):298-307. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.06.017
[28]	Pottier T, Brient A, Turpin YL, et al. Accuracy evaluation of bracket repositioning by indirect bonding: Hard acrylic CAD/CAM versus soft one-layer silicone trays, an in vitro study[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2020, 24(11):3889-3897. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03256-x
[29]	Schmid J, Brenner D, Recheis W, et al. Transfer accuracy of two indirect bonding techniques-an in vitro study with 3D scanned models[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2018, 40(5):549-555. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy006
[30]	曾湫雲. 口腔正畸间接粘接不同工作模型获得方法的托槽转移精确度研究[D]. 重庆: 中国人民解放军陆军军医大学, 2020.
[31]	徐国祥, 王智伟, 成伟, 等. 三种间接粘接方法转移托槽的准确性比较[J]. 中华口腔正畸学杂志, 2021, 28(3):136-140.
[32]	郑学彬, 李富杰, 胡硕红, 等. 透明硅橡胶结合压膜双层转移托盘间接粘接托槽技术的效果评估[J]. 中国美容医学, 2021, 30(8):124-127.
[33]	Park JH, Choi JY, Oh SH, et al. Three-dimensional digital superimposition of orthodontic bracket position by using a computer-aided transfer jig system: An accuracy analysis[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(17):5911. doi: 10.3390/s21175911
[34]	Hickham JH. Predictable indirect bonding[J]. J ClinOrthod, 1993, 27(4):215-217.
[35]	Joiner M. In-house precision bracket placement with the indirect bonding technique[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 137(6):850-854. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.023
[36]	Yıldırım K, Saglam-Aydinatay B. Comparative assessment of treatment efficacy and adverse effects during nonextraction orthodontic treatment of Class I malocclusion patients with direct and indirect bonding: A parallel randomized clinical trial[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2018, 154(1):26-34.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.12.009
[37]	Bachour PC, Klabunde R, Grünheid T. Transfer accuracy of 3D-printed trays for indirect bonding of orthodontic brackets[J]. Angle Orthod, 2022, 92(3):372-379. doi: 10.2319/073021-596.1 pmid: 35006236
[38]	Czolgosz I, Cattaneo PM, Cornelis MA. Computer-aided indirect bonding versus traditional direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: Bonding time, immediate bonding failures, and cost-minimization. A randomized controlled trial[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2021, 43(2):144-151. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa045
[39]	Christensen LR. Digital workflows in orthodontics[J]. J Clin Orthod, 2018, 52(1):34-44.