›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 668-671.

• 基础与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

4种牙科玻璃纤维桩挠曲强度与弹性模量的对比分析

李齐齐1,耿建平2   

  1. 1. 浙江省绍兴市口腔医院
    2. 南京工业大学生物医学工程研究所
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-24 修回日期:2012-06-24 出版日期:2013-10-28 发布日期:2013-10-31
  • 通讯作者: 李齐齐 E-mail:lqq8562462@163.com

Study on flexural strength and elastic modulus of 4 kinds of glass fiber posts

  • Received:2012-05-24 Revised:2012-06-24 Online:2013-10-28 Published:2013-10-31

摘要: [摘要] 目的 对比分析临床常用的4种玻璃纤维桩的挠曲强度及弹性模量。方法 选取Style Post (A组)、Parapost Fiber Whiter (B组)、Fiber Kor (C组)、Twin-Luscent Anchor (D组)纤维桩各10支,采用三点抗弯强度试验测定其挠曲强度和弹性模量,并进行统计分析。结果 A组挠曲强度显著高于其余三组(P<0.05),B组与C组挠曲强度最小,组间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。A组与D组的弹性模量无显著性差异(P>0.05),均低于其他2组(P<0.05)。纵向扫描电镜图显示,B组和C组试样出现较多裂纹,整体呈现较大程度的劈裂模式。结论 4种玻璃纤维桩挠曲强度及弹性模量间存在较大差异,A组挠曲强度最大,A组和D组弹性模量与牙本质最为接近,挠曲强度值与纤维/基质比间存在线性关系。

关键词: 纤维桩, 挠曲强度, 弹性模量, 纤维/基质比, fiber post, flexure strength, elastic modulus, fiber/matrix ratios

Abstract: Abstract: Objective To compare and analyse the flexure strength and elastic modulus of 4 kinds of dental fiber posts frequently used in clinics. Methods The flexural strength and elastic modulus of Style Post (group A), Parapost Fiber Whiter (group B), Fiber Kor (group C) and Twin-Luscent Anchor (group D) fiber posts were measured through three-point bending test with 10 firber posts in each group. The results were statistically analyzed. Results The flexure strength of group A was the highest, while that of group B and group C was the lowest, and there were no statistical differences among the groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences between group A and group D in elastic modulus (P>0.05), and the elastic modulus of group A and group D were both lower than that of the other two groups (P<0.05). Multitudinous cracks were observed in group B and C from SEM photos and there was a great degree of rupture generally . Conclusion The the flexure strength and elastic modulus of 4 kinds of glass fiber posts are significantly different. The flexural strength and fiber/matrix ratios are linearly dependent.

中图分类号: