›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 675-678.

• 基础与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同前期处理方法对Icon树脂渗透修复早期龋效果影响的研究

周群1,史同庆2,李淑文3,单军4,郭蕾5,于月5,马琳5   

  1. 1. 中国医科大学附属盛京医院口腔科
    2. 大庆医学高等专科学校
    3. 黑龙江省大庆市大庆医学高等专科学校临床系
    4. 沈阳市口腔医院特诊科
    5. 沈阳市中国医科大学附属盛京医院口腔科
  • 收稿日期:2012-04-13 修回日期:2012-05-31 出版日期:2013-10-28 发布日期:2013-10-31
  • 通讯作者: 史同庆 E-mail:stq9853013@126.com

Research of Icon resin infiltrates to repair initial enamel lesions with various pre-treatment methods

  • Received:2012-04-13 Revised:2012-05-31 Online:2013-10-28 Published:2013-10-31

摘要: 目的 通过对人工釉质龋进行不同方法处理,观察Icon的渗透效果。 方法 选取正畸拔除完好的第一前磨牙和第一磨牙32颗,置于人工脱矿液中14 d形成早期人工釉质龋。再随机分成4组,各组龋损表面分别用15%盐酸、37%磷酸和Opalustre打磨处理后,荧光素钠(NaFl)染色,Icon树脂渗透和光固化处理。激光扫描共聚焦显微镜(CLSM)镜下观察,比较4种处理方法对渗透的影响。 结果 盐酸组和磷酸组在渗透深度上存在显著性差异(P < 0.05),盐酸组渗透效果更好;两打磨组间渗透深度存在显著性差异(P < 0.05),提高打磨时间可以提高渗透效果,打磨组2与磷酸组、盐酸组均存在显著性差异(P<0.05),采用Opalustre打磨40 s后,Icon的渗透效果更好。 结论 龋表面的高钙化层是阻碍Icon渗透治疗的一道屏障,盐酸处理后Icon的渗透效果优于磷酸处理,而通过打磨表面层40 s后的渗透效果又明显优于20 s处理。早期龋表层的打磨处理可以考虑作为Icon临床治疗前期处理的替代和补充。

关键词: 树脂渗透, icon, 早期龋, 釉质, 表层打磨, resin infiltration, icon, initial caries, enamel, surface polished

Abstract: Objective Various approaches were adopted to treat the surfaces of artificial demineralized enamel lesions. By observing the penetration effects we could get more viable foundation for the clinical application. Methods 32 intact first premolars and first molars were selected from orthodontic extraction. They were placed in the artificial demineralization solution for 14 days to form initial artificial enamel caries. The teeth were divided into four groups randomly, and surfaces of teeth in each group were dealed with 15% hydrochloric acid, 37% phosphate and polished by Opalustre, stained by NaFl, penetrated with Icon and processed with light solidification. By observed under CLSM microscope, the impact of four treatment methods on penetration depths was compared. Results There were significant differences in depths of penetration between hydrochloric acid group and phosphoric acid group(P<0.05).The hydrochloric acid group got a better result. There were significant differences between the two polished groups in the depths of penetration(P<0.05). Increasing grinding time could increase the penetration effect. There were significant differences in penetration depths between polished group 2 and hydrochloric acid group or phosphoric acid group(P<0.05). Polishing 40 seconds with Opalustre produced a better result. Conclusions The highly calcified layer is a barrier impeding the Icon to penetrate. The penetration effect of the hydrochloric acid treatment is better than that of the phosphoric acid treatment. By grinding for forty seconds of the barrier, the penetration effect is significantly better than that dealt for twenty seconds. So grinding can be considered as an alternative or a complement of pretreatment method in clinical treatment.

中图分类号: