SUS 2和Jasper Jumper矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类患者的疗效对比

›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 765-767.

SUS 2和Jasper Jumper矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类患者的疗效对比

雷明辉¹,刘兴平²,范磊²

1. 陕西中医学院附属医院
2. 淮安市淮阴区营中社区卫生服务中心

收稿日期:2013-05-13 修回日期:2013-05-29 出版日期:2013-11-28 发布日期:2013-11-25
通讯作者: 雷明辉 E-mail:jsdentsci@hotmail.com

Comparison of curative effects of SUS2 and Jasper Jumper in treating Angle class Ⅱdivision 1 malocclusion

Received:2013-05-13 Revised:2013-05-29 Online:2013-11-28 Published:2013-11-25
Contact: Minghui Lei E-mail:jsdentsci@hotmail.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨SUS2和Jasper Jumper 2种口腔正畸矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类1分类患者的疗效异同点。方法筛选安氏Ⅱ类1分类青少年患者共46例，随机分为2组，分别使用SUS2和Jasper Jumper，拍摄头颅侧位片，观测18项测量指标治疗前后的变化值。结果 2组矫治前后ANB、Y-axis、L1-MP、U6-OLP等指标存在显著性差异。结论 SUS2和Jasper Jumper 2种矫治器的疗效不完全一致，治疗中应合理选择。

关键词: SUS2, Jasper Jumper, 安氏Ⅱ类1分类, SUS2 , Jasper Jumper, Angle class Ⅱ division 1

Abstract: Objective To discuss and compare the similarities and differences in the curative effects of SUS2 and Jasper Jumperin treating Angle class Ⅱdivision 1 malocclusion. Methods 46 adolescent Angle class Ⅱdivision 1 patients were selected and randomly divided into two groups,respectively using SUS2 and Jasper Jumper orthodontic appliances.Lateral cephalograms were taken and the changes of 18 measurement indexes were observed and used in cephalometric analysis before and after treatment. Results Changes of such indexes as ANB,Yaxis,L1MP and U6OLP were significantly different between two groups. Conclusions There are some differences in the curative effects between SUS2 and Jasper Jumper and we should choose the most appropriate one for treatment.

中图分类号:

R783.5

雷明辉刘兴平范磊. SUS 2和Jasper Jumper矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类患者的疗效对比[J]. 口腔医学, 2013, 33(11): 765-767.

[1]	任继业王文君. SUS2矫治器联合微螺钉支抗治疗安氏Ⅱ1类患者的临床研究[J]. , 2017, 37(11): 1025-1028.
[2]	浦逢燕李青奕. McNamara分析法评价改良SUS2矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类错合的临床疗效[J]. , 2016, 36(9): 829-831.
[3]	任继业史建陆林艺翚. 应用相关性分析评价两种功能矫治器的治疗效果的研究[J]. , 2014, 34(6): 457-460.
[4]	熊莉,陈晓峰,段义峰. 安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合畸形Twin-block结合固定正畸双期矫治的临床疗效分析[J]. , 2012, 32(11): 690-692.
[5]	俞贤江. 上颌斜面导板在安氏Ⅱ类1分类错矫治中的疗效分析[J]. , 2011, 31(8): 507-508.
[6]	张　彦,王　林,赵春洋. 功能矫治器对安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合畸形软组织侧貌的影响[J]. , 2011, 31(6): 365-367.
[7]	闻越,王军,任斌,刘帆,石晶,高原侠,许晗,房伯君. 女性恒牙牙合初期安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合畸形的Coben法分析[J]. , 2011, 31(2): 96-98.
[8]	王海任,王春玲,刘铃,高晓丽. 恒牙早期安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合畸形患者矫治后鼻部形态变化的研究[J]. , 2011, 31(10): 582-585.
[9]	周晓勇;段银钟;文绍先;刘伟. Forsus推杆式矫正器的临床应用23例观察[J]. , 2008, 28(10): 531-531,559.
[10]	王世兴,赵俊杰. 头帽式肌激动器矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合26例临床应用[J]. , 2005, 25(6): 383-384.
[11]	孙燕,刘泓虎,曹惠菊. 口外颈牵引装置早期矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合的疗效研究[J]. , 2004, 24(5): 290-292.
[12]	黄吉娜,徐学军. 安氏Ⅱ类1分类拔牙矫治患者的X线头影测量研究[J]. , 2002, 22(02): 72-74.