›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 813-816.

• 基础与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

特殊粘接技术在前牙美学区种植修复中的应用

贺刚1,汤春波2   

  1. 1. 宁波口腔医院
    2. 江苏省口腔医院
  • 收稿日期:2013-07-31 修回日期:2013-09-04 出版日期:2013-12-28 发布日期:2014-01-02
  • 通讯作者: 汤春波 E-mail:chunbotang@gmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫生厅科技项目;“江苏省六大人才”高峰项目;江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目;江苏省科技支撑计划资助项目

The Evaluation of a Special Cementation Technique in Implant Restoration in the Esthetic Zone

Gang He,   

  • Received:2013-07-31 Revised:2013-09-04 Online:2013-12-28 Published:2014-01-02

摘要: 目的 介绍一种前牙美学区种植修复的特殊粘接技术,并评价其临床疗效。方法 选择60例单个前牙种植修复患者,均采用粘接固位,粘接边缘位于龈下1~1.5 mm。对照组采用传统粘接技术,实验组采用特殊粘接技术。修复完成1个月和6个月后分别统计两组的改良牙龈出血指数、龈沟深度和修复体脱落率。结果 修复后1个月,实验组的改良牙龈出血指数显著优于对照组,其它指标无统计学差异;修复后6个月,两组各项指标无统计学差异。结论 本研究介绍的特殊粘接技术有助于在修复后早期减少粘接剂残留引起的种植体周围炎,提升牙龈健康水平。

关键词: 种植修复, 粘接固位, 种植体周围炎, implant restoration, cement retention, periimplantitis

Abstract: Objective To introduce and evaluate one kind of novel cementing technique of implant restoration in the esthetic zone. Methods 60 cases of anterior cemented implant restorations were included. The cement margins of these restorations were located 1 to 1.5 mm under gingival margin. A novel cementing technique was introduced in experimental group while conventional cementation technique was applied in the control group. mSBI, PD and cementation failure rate were recorded and evaluated 1 month and 6 months respectively after cementation. Results 1 month after cementation, the mSBI of experimental group was statistically lower than that of control group, while no statistically significant difference was found in other parameters. 6 months after cementation, there was no statistically significant difference in any parameters between two groups. Conclusion The special cementation technique is helpful to reduce the possibility of periimplantitis caused by excess cement in the early phase and to enhance the gingival health.

中图分类号: