›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 49-51.

• 基础与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

2种垫底材料对后牙深龋充填的敏感性比较

汤海峰,徐斌,彭良文,吉蒙蒙,肖国岫   

  1. 复旦大学附属上海市第五人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2013-05-09 修回日期:2013-07-31 出版日期:2014-01-28 发布日期:2014-01-28
  • 通讯作者: 汤海峰 E-mail:tanghaifengfeng@yeah.net
  • 基金资助:
    上海市闵行区科委课题

Comparison of Postoperative Sensitivity of Two Liner Materials in Posterior Restorations

  • Received:2013-05-09 Revised:2013-07-31 Online:2014-01-28 Published:2014-01-28

摘要: 目的 比较3M光固化玻璃离子和DMG爱诺赛光固化复合体两种垫底材料对后牙深龋充填的术后敏感性。 方法 84例84颗深龋后牙,随机分为3M组和DMG组,3M组垫底材料为3M VitrebondTM光固化玻璃离子,DMG组垫底材料为DMG Ionosit-Baseliner爱诺赛光固化复合体,自酸蚀后,两组上层均加压填充3M FiltekTM Z350纳米复合树脂,于修复后1天、1周、1个月和3个月,对敏感发生率和自觉疼痛程度进行比较。 结果 术后1天、1周和1个月,3M组和DMG组的术后敏感率和自觉疼痛程度无差异(P>0.05),术后3个月,3M组的术后敏感率和疼痛程度低于DMG组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 在后牙深龋治疗中,使用光固化玻璃离子垫底材料可降低术后敏感的发生。

关键词: 玻璃离子, 爱诺赛, 深龋, 夹层技术, glass ionomer, Ionosit-Baseliner, deep caries, sandwich technique

Abstract: Objective To compare the postoperative sensitivity of deep caries treated with 3M light cured glass ionomer and DMG Ionosit-Baseliner. Methods A total of 84 posterior teeth with deep caries from 84 patients were randomly divided into two groups: 3M group and DMG group. 3M VitrebondTM light cured glass ionomer was used as liner material in Group 3M and Ionosit-Baseliner was used in Group DMG. After etching, both groups were filled with 3M FiltekTM Z350 nano composite resin. The sensitivity and the pain degree were evaluated and compared 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after operation. Results There was no significant difference in the postoperative sensitivity and self-pain level between the two groups after 1 day, 1 week and 1 month (P>0.05). Compared with group DMG, the incidence of sensitivity and self-pain level were lower in group 3M 3 months after operation(P<0.05).Conclusions In posterior restorations, the light cured glass ionomer can reduce the incidence of postoperative sensitivity.

中图分类号: