›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 911-913.

• 基础与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

细丝弓和直丝弓技术矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合的比较研究

王先军1,李琥2   

  1. 1. 苏州市立医院东区
    2. 南京医科大学口腔医学研究所,附属口腔医院正畸科
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-21 修回日期:2014-05-11 出版日期:2014-12-28 发布日期:2015-01-02
  • 通讯作者: 李琥 E-mail:dentistlihu@yahoo.com.cn

Comparative analysis of treatment of Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion using the light wire and straight wire technique

  • Received:2014-04-21 Revised:2014-05-11 Online:2014-12-28 Published:2015-01-02

摘要: 目的 比较细丝弓技术和直丝弓技术矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类错的疗效。方法 选择2009年1月—2012年12月于苏州市立医院东区口腔科治疗结束的安氏Ⅱ类1分类错患者30例,其中15例采用细丝弓技术治疗,15例采用直丝弓技术治疗,对两组患者治疗前后的模型测量和头影测量结果进行分析比较。结果 两组病例在治疗后均恢复了正常的咬合关系,在垂直关系和矢状关系上均无明显差异;细丝弓技术治疗组中下切牙与下颌平面所成角的减少比直丝弓技术治疗组少;治疗疗程以及复诊次数的比较上,细丝弓技术明显低于直丝弓技术组。结论 细丝弓技术治疗安氏Ⅱ类1分类错具有治疗时间短、疗效好的优势,但是对于下前牙角度的控制较为薄弱。

关键词: 细丝弓技术, 直丝弓技术, 安氏Ⅱ类错畸形

Abstract: Objective Retrospective evaluate the effect of the treatment of the Objective To evaluate the effect of the treatment of the Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion by the light wire and straight wire technique. Methods 30 adolescents of the Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion were selected.They were treated with light wire technique (15) and straight wire technique(15)respectively. Model measurement and cephalometric radiographs were taken and analyzed before and after treatment. Statistical method was used to determine if there were significant differences between the 2 techniques. Results There was no significant difference in the sagittal and vertical relationship. They all gained a good occlusion after treatment. The L1-MP decreased less in the light wire technique group than in the straight wire technique group.Average treatment time in the light wire technique group was shorter than the other group. Conclusions Light wire technique is a clinically effective method for correcting the Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion, while it might be weak in the lower incisors control after the treatment.

Key words: light wire technique, straight wire technique, Class Ⅱ division 1

中图分类号: