微种植体支抗治疗双颌前突患者前后颜面形态改变的研究

›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 241-241.

• 基础与临床研究 • 下一篇

微种植体支抗治疗双颌前突患者前后颜面形态改变的研究

倪密¹,陈文静²

1. 南京医科大学附属南京市第一医院
2. 江苏省口腔医院

收稿日期:2013-09-04 修回日期:2013-10-27 出版日期:2014-04-28 发布日期:2014-05-15
通讯作者: 倪密 E-mail:nimizbq_orth@163.com

Study of facial changes in the patients of bimaxillary protrusion after orthodontic treatment with micro ?mplant anchorage

Mi Ni,

Received:2013-09-04 Revised:2013-10-27 Online:2014-04-28 Published:2014-05-15
Contact: Mi Ni E-mail:nimizbq_orth@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： ［摘要］目的探讨双颌前突患者微型种植体矫治前后软、硬组织变化的相关规律，评估微种植体支抗矫治双颌前突患者的治疗效果。方法选取使用微型种植体支抗矫治双颌前突患者15例。对治疗前后的头颅侧位X线片进行测量分析，评价微种植体支抗在双颌前突患者治疗中的临床效果，并分析软硬组织变化的相关性。设计调查表调查患者对治疗效果的满意程度。结果矫正结束，患者面型均得到了显著改善。上切牙内收（3.12±0.90） mm，下切牙内收（2.63±0.83） mm，上下唇突度分别减少了（3.45±1.19） mm和（2.18±0.38） mm，且鼻唇角增大。软硬组织的变化存在相关性，其中上下唇突度、鼻唇角大小的改变与前牙突度的改变呈高度相关。93.3%患者对治疗效果满意。〖HTH〗结论〓〖HTSS〗使用微型种植体支抗可以使上下前牙得以有效内收，同时改善面型，取得良好的临床效果。

关键词: 微种植体支抗双颌前突软组织侧貌视觉模拟量表头影测量分析

Abstract: Abstract: Objective To explore the change regulation of hard and soft tissue and to assess the effect of miniscrew implant anchorage (MIA) on patients with bimaxillary protrusion by digital cephalometric analysis and survey before and after treatment.〖WTHZ〗Methods Soft and hard tissue changes were measured on the lateral cephalometric radiographs of 15 cases with bimaxillary protrusion who were treated with MIA before and after treatment in order to analyze the relevance of hard and soft tissue changes and evaluate the effects of MIA.Patient satisfactory survey was also adopted. Results Patients′ appearances were all significantly improved after the treatment.Adduction of upper incisors was (3.12±0.90) mm,while adduction of lower incisors was (2.63±0.83) mm.The protrusion of upper /lower lip decreased by (3.45±1.19) mm /(2.18±0.38) mm respectively with the increase of nasolabial angle.There were relevant rules between hard and soft tissue change,in which upper and lower lip protrusion and nasolabial angle changes were highly correlated with the change of the anterior incisors protrusion.93.3% patients were satisfied with the treatment result. Conclusions MIA can adduct the upper and lower incisors effectively,as well as improve the face profile and achieve good clinical results.

Key words: miniscrew implant anchorage, bimaxillary protrusion, soft tissues profile, visual analog scale, cephalometric study

中图分类号:

R783.5

倪密陈文静. 微种植体支抗治疗双颌前突患者前后颜面形态改变的研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2014, 34(4): 241-241.

Mi Ni. Study of facial changes in the patients of bimaxillary protrusion after orthodontic treatment with micro ?mplant anchorage[J]. Stomatology, 2014, 34(4): 241-241.

参考文献

[1]Scott SH,Johnston LE.The perceived impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on matched samples of African American patients[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1999,116(3):352-360
[2]Hayashida H,Ioi H,Nakata S,et al.Effects of retraction of anterior teeth and initial soft t4 variables on lip changes in Japanese adults[J].Eur J Orthod,2011,33(4):419-426
[3]Farrow AL,Zarrinnia K,Azizi K.Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans--an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1993,104(3):240-250
[4]Lew K.Profile changes following orthodontic treatment of bimaxillary protrusion in adults with the Begg appliance[J].Eur J Orthod,1989,11(4):375-381
[5]Geron S,Shpack N,Kandos S,et al.Anchorage loss--a multifactorial response[J].Angle Orthod,2003,73(6):730-737
[6]Thiruvenkatachari B,Pavithranand A,Rajasigamani K,et al.Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2006,129(4):551-554
[7]李福军.微型种植体支抗和多用途弓压低上前牙的疗效对比[J].口腔医学研究,2009,25(4):491-493
[8]Upadhyay M,Yadav S,Nagaraj K,et al.Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2008,134(1):18-29
[9]Liu Y,Ding W,Liu J,et al.Comparison of the differences in cephalometric parameters after active orthodontic treatment applying mini‐screw implants or transpalatal arches in adult patients with bialveolar dental protrusion[J].J Oral Rehabil,2009,36(9):687-695
[10]Solem RC,Marasco R,Guiterrez-Pulido L,et al.Three-dimensional soft-t2 and hard-t2 changes in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2013,144(2):218-228
[11]王震东,朱效萍.正畸患者对于微种植体支抗使用的主观反应:临床问卷调查[J].口腔医学,2009,29(12):632-634
[12] 岳士超.微种植支抗与口外支抗对上颌或双颌前突患者的疗效评价[D].重庆: 重庆医科大学,2012
[13]李平,毛靖,朱声荣,等.微型种植体支抗在安氏 Ⅰ 类双颌前突矫治中的应用研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2007,23(11):688-690
[14] 燕玲.徐宇红国内微种植体与传统支抗技术临床应用的系统评价[D].贵州遵义医学院第五附属医院,2010
[15]Li F,Hu HK,Chen JW,et al.Comparison of anchorage capacity between implant and headgear during anterior segment retraction[J].Angle Orthod,2011,81(5):915-922
[16]Bishara SE.Facial and dental changes in adolescents and their clinical implications[J].Angle Orthod,2000,70(6):471-483
[17]Luecke PR,Johnston LJ.The effect of maxillary first premolar extraction and incisor retraction on mandibular position: testing the central dogma of "functional orthodontics"[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1992,101(1):4-12
[18]Paquette DE,Beattie JR,Johnston LJ.A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1992,102(1):1-14
[19]Burstone CJ.Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning[J].Am J Orthod,1967,53(4):262-284
[20]Zierhut EC,Joondeph DR,Artun J,et al.Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction Class II Division 1 malocclusions[J].Angle Orthod,2000,70(3):208-219
[21]Kasai K.Soft t6 adaptability to hard t6s in facial profiles[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1998,113(6):674-684

微种植体支抗治疗双颌前突患者前后颜面形态改变的研究

Study of facial changes in the patients of bimaxillary protrusion after orthodontic treatment with micro ?mplant anchorage

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张雪莹沈梦圆陈彬孟箭. 单颗下颌切牙先天缺失不同治疗模式的疗效研究[J]. , 2022, 42(11): 1015-1018.
[2]	陆建锋郭海波邱憬. 骨皮质微钻孔术辅助压低磨牙在修复前正畸中应用的临床研究[J]. , 2022, 42(11): 1000-1005.
[3]	刘玮玮马俊青. 安氏Ⅰ类拔牙正畸治疗牙槽嵴高度变化的CBCT研究[J]. , 2022, 42(11): 1011-1014.
[4]	张严匀李易王贺张曼张苗苗. 大鼠牙齿移动过程中Piezo1对压力侧牙周组织中RIP3及MLKL的影响[J]. , 2022, 42(10): 883-888.
[5]	杨婉琪李熙恒李慧于晓艺朱宪春. 无托槽隐形矫治技术的生物力学研究进展[J]. , 2022, 42(10): 951-955.
[6]	张建云李贵凤张昆郝静. 下颌第三磨牙长距离近中移动后牙根吸收的研究[J]. , 2022, 42(10): 900-904.
[7]	刘毅赓卢云. CBCT分析上颌磨牙牙根及其牙槽嵴顶与上颌窦底壁的位置关系[J]. , 2022, 42(10): 889-894.
[8]	于晓艺陈思宇李慧杨婉琪李欣怡朱宪春. 隐形下颌前导矫治器治疗骨性Ⅱ类效果研究[J]. , 2022, 42(9): 813-817.
[9]	毛艳敏卢芸许衍李强刘月华. 下颌第一磨牙缺失间隙关闭前后的骨量变化[J]. , 2022, 42(9): 818-823.
[10]	刘光俊马锦锦陶珂金江静冯剑颖. 不同粘接剂去除方式对釉质微观结构及托槽再粘接强度的影响[J]. , 2022, 42(9): 785-789.
[11]	沈奕洋冯筱妍张晨星李娟林军. 数字化多学科联合治疗骨性II类高角伴阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征成年患者一例[J]. , 2022, 42(9): 824-830.
[12]	何梦佳周宇王思婕斯佳萍陈小燕. 无托槽隐形矫治器推上颌磨牙远移的效率及影响因素研究进展[J]. , 2022, 42(9): 851-855.
[13]	宋野韩晶莹. 正畸前磨牙拔除模式对Bolton指数的影响研究进展[J]. , 2022, 42(9): 856-859.
[14]	赵明璨王秀丽黄洋. 一种单侧下颌第一恒磨牙远移的新方法及其临床疗效评价[J]. , 2022, 42(8): 707-712.
[15]	彭佳佳陆文昕赵志河方婕. 牙槽骨微穿孔术加速正畸牙齿移动的研究进展[J]. , 2022, 42(8): 732-736.