›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 365-367.

• 基础与临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

2种不同矫治技术出现牙龈折痕的临床分析

房莉1,田杰2,吴隽轶1,朱磊3,唐小山4   

  1. 1. 上海市同济大学附属第十人民医院
    2. 上海市时代天使口腔门诊部
    3. 上海市第十人民医院口腔医疗中心
    4. 上海市闸北区第十人民医院口腔医疗保健中心
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-03 修回日期:2013-07-15 出版日期:2014-05-28 发布日期:2014-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 房莉 E-mail:beautyfangli@163.com

Clinical analysis of gingival invagination with two kinds of orthodontic technology

  • Received:2013-06-03 Revised:2013-07-15 Online:2014-05-28 Published:2014-06-04

摘要: 目的 探讨2种不同矫治技术对出现牙龈折痕的影响。方法 分别选择75例拔除前磨牙行直丝弓固定矫治和22例拔牙无托槽隐形矫治病例,比较这2种不同矫治技术的牙龈折痕发生率,并针对性别、年龄、关闭间隙距离以及矫治时间等因素进行logistic回归分析。结果 不同矫治技术出现牙龈折痕的差异无统计学意义。性别、关闭间隙距离和关闭间隙时间对牙龈折痕的出现无统计学意义,年龄与牙龈折痕的出现呈正相关,且有统计学意义。结论 牙龈折痕的出现不受矫治技术的影响,可能与年龄有一定的相关性。

关键词: 隐形矫治, 牙龈折痕, 拔牙矫治, 牙周组织

Abstract: Objective Todiscuss two kinds of orthodontic technology that caused the gingival invagination and the influence on its occurrence.Methods 75 cases that used straight wire application system (with the first premolar extracted) and 22 cases that used invisible application system were selected and the incidence rate of gingival invagination was compared between two groups.Logistic regression analysis was done with regard to such factors as gender,age,closing the extraction space and the treatment time.Results There was no significant difference inthe occurrence rate of gingival invagination in these two systems.Gender,the time of closing the extraction space and the size of extraction space did not influence the occurrence of gingival invagination while age had the positive correlation with gingival invagination.Conclusions The gingival invagination is not influenced by different methods of orthodontic technology.It might have correlation with age.

Key words: invisible orthodontics, gingival invagination, extraction treatment, periodontium

中图分类号: