不同根管预备方法和充填技术组合对根尖微渗漏和牙根抗折强度的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【摘要】目的探讨几种根管预备方法和充填技术组合对根尖微渗漏和牙根抗折强度的影响。方法选取离体牙186颗，随机分为6个实验组(A、B、C、D、E、F，每组各30颗牙)和阳性、阴性对照组(G、H，每组3颗牙)。A、B、C组采用逐步深入法进行根管预备，D、E、F组采用逐步后退法。其后，A、D组使用BeeFillTM 2in1热牙胶充填系统进行根管充填，B、E组给予Cortisomol糊剂配合热牙胶以垂直加压法，C、F组予以Cortisomol糊剂配合冷牙胶以侧方加压法，G、H组均不做任何充填。采用染料渗透法检测各组离体牙根尖微渗漏情况，对各组离体牙进行纵向抗折强度力学测试。结果相同充填方法下多个预备方法比较，A、B、C组染料渗透长度分别小于D、E、F组(P＜0.05)，A、B、C组最大抗压负荷分别大于D、E、F组(P＜0.05)。相同预备方法下，A组染料渗透长度小于B、C组(P＜0.05)，D组染料渗透长度小于E、F组(P＜0.05)；A、B、C组最大抗压负荷依次降低(P＜0.05)，D、E、F组最大抗压负荷依次降低(P＜0.05)。G、H组间最大抗压负荷比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05)。结论使用逐步深入法进行根管预备，并联合BeeFillTM 2in1热牙胶充填系统应用于根管治疗能够显著减少根尖微渗漏，并提高牙根抗折强度，对根管预备和充填技术的选择具有一定的借鉴意义。

关键词: 根管治疗, 根管预备, 充填技术, 微渗漏, 抗折强度

Abstract: Objective: To explore the influence on micro leakage from root tip and tooth root’s bending strength by different combinations of root canal preparation and filling technology. Methods: 186 extracted teeth were selected and randomly divided into 6 experimental groups (A, B, C, D, E, F group, 30 teeth per group) and positive, negative control group (G, H group, 3 teeth per group). Group A, B, C were given root canal preparation by step-down technique, and group D, E, F were given step-back technique. Subsequently, BeeFillTM 2in1 teeth filling system was used in group A and D to fill root canal, and group B and E were given Cortisomol paste with warm gutta percha fill with vertical compression method, yet group G and H were not given any filling. The dye penetration method was used to measure root tip’s micro leakage, and tooth root’s bending strength was also measured in each group. Results: With the same filling method, the dye penetration lengths of group A, B, C were all less than those of group D, E, F respectively(t=3.29~4.66,P＜0.05), and group A, B, C’s maximum compressive loads were higher than those of group D, E, F respectively(t=3.11~4.50,P＜0.05). With the same preparation methods, dye penetration length in group A was less than that of group B and C(t=3.32~4.77,P＜0.05),and dye penetration length of group D was less than that of group E and F group(t=3.17~4.35,P＜0.05).Group A,B,C’s maximum compressive load decreased successively(F=5.13,P＜0.05),and group D,E, F’s maximum compressive load also decreased (F=4.87,P＜0.05),yet there was no statistical difference in maximum compressive load between group G and H(t=0.00,P＞0.05). Conclusions: The use of root canal preparation with step-down technique, and BeeFillTM 2in1 teeth filling system can effectively reduce micro leakage from root tip and improve tooth root’s bending strength, which has reference value for selection of root canal preparation and filling techniques.

Key words: root canal therapy, root canal preparation, filling techniques, micro leakage, bending strength

中图分类号:

R781.05

曹纯芳吴永正吕陶红吴华英. 不同根管预备方法和充填技术组合对根尖微渗漏和牙根抗折强度的影响[J]. 口腔医学, 2015, 35(3): 183-186.

参考文献

[1] 李小彤,马超,崔亮,等.根管治疗牙正畸加力后根吸收的相关因素研究[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志,2009,16(4):190-193.
[2] 危薇,陈作良.根管微渗漏实验方法的研究进展[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2008,3(4)：372-374.
[3] 葛兵,吴友农,蔡建强,等.两种根管充填技术对牙根抗力的影响[J].口腔医学,2009, 29(1)：27-29.
[4] Taha NA,Palamara JE,Messer HH. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations[J].Oper Dent,2014,39(2): 181-188.
[5] 孙玮.125个根管治疗术失败原因的临床分析[J].安徽医药,2009,13(7) : 780-781.
[6] 崔吉民,申文显,韩福胜.不同桩道预备时机对三种根尖封闭剂封闭效果的影响[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2011,46(z1):19-21.
[7] 窦磊,叶玲,谭红,等.根管充填后牙根抗折强度的研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2013,31(3):232-234.
[8] Er K,Tasdemir T,Siso SH,et al.Fracture resistance of retreated roots using different retreatment systems[J].Eur J Dent,2011,5(4): 387-392.
[9] Tuna EB,Dinol ME,Genay K,et al.Fracture resistance of immature teeth filled with bioAggregate,mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium hydroxide[J].Dent Traumatol,2011,27 (3):174-178.
[10] Ozdemir HO,Buzoglu HD,Calt S,et al.Chemical and ultramorphologic effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and sodium hypochlorite in young and oOld root canal dentin[J].J Endod,2012,38(2):204-208.
[11] 耿涛.Er:YAG激光预备窝沟充填的微渗漏研究[J].中国基层医药,2013,20(18):2724-2726.
[12] 周欣,马琦,尹兴喆,等.三种方法预备下颌第二磨牙C形根管成形效果的比较[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2008,43(3):151-153.
[13] Topuolu HS,Arslan H,Kelel A,et al.Fracture resistance of roots filled with three different obturation techniques[J].Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal,2012,17(3):528-532.
[14] 周秀娟,董艳梅,高学军.三种根管充填技术根管系统充盈致密度的实验观察[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2010,45(8):494-497.
[15] 张琛,黄巍,侯本祥.四种根管充填技术根充同质性和致密度评价[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2010,45(11):673-677.
[16] 彭澜,陈建钢.不同根管充填方法和根管封闭剂根尖微渗漏的研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2012,28(1)：53-55.