不同镍钛器械预备根管后根尖偏移的CBCT比较研究

›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 338-340.

不同镍钛器械预备根管后根尖偏移的CBCT比较研究

吴亚娟¹,曹雪娇²,花荣²,马鸣³,魏昕³

1. 南京医科大学
2. 口腔医学院
3. 江苏省口腔医院

收稿日期:2015-01-22 修回日期:2015-03-09 出版日期:2015-05-28 发布日期:2015-05-13
通讯作者: 魏昕 E-mail:weixinart@163.com

Cone－beam computed tomography analysis of the apical transportation after mechanical preparation with differentrotary nickel－titanium systems

Received:2015-01-22 Revised:2015-03-09 Online:2015-05-28 Published:2015-05-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的通过CBCT测量镍钛器械预备根管后的根管偏移和中心定位率，来评价K3、Hero、MTwo根管预备的效果。方法将按纳入标准收集的30颗离体牙随机分为3组，其中 A 组用 K3按冠向下法预备至#30/0.04; B组用 Hero预备至#30/0.04；C组用MTwo备至#30/0.04；然后，用锥束 CT 测量预备前后在距根尖3 mm处的近、远中的根管壁厚度，利用 Gambill 提出的公式计算根管偏移量和轴中心率，采用统计学比较3组的结果。结果 3组相比，无论是根管偏移量还是轴中心率，差异均无统计学意义(P＞0．05) 。根管预备前后，3种镍钛对根管预备偏移量及轴中心率改变不明显(P＞0．05)。结论 3种镍钛器械都能基本维持根管原来的形态，产生较小的根尖偏移量。

关键词: 镍钛器械, CBCT, 根管偏移, 轴中心率

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to use high-resolution CBCT to evaluate the effects of three Ni-Ti rotary endodontic instruments-K3, Hero, and MTwo, on canal transportation and centring ratio. Methods 30 mesial roots of extracted mandibular molars were randomly divided into three groups with 15 teeth in each. The final instruments used were all #30/0.04.Teeth were scanned before and after instrumentation using CBCT to measure volume and shaping changes. Canal transportation and centring ratio were evaluated at 3 mm from the end of each root. The method developed by Gambill was chosen. Results No statistically significant differences were found among the three groups in terms of canal transportation or centring ratio at any level (P>0.05).These systems were able to produce centred preparations of canals with minimal transportation.Conclusions These three Ni-Ti rotary endodontic instruments can maintain the primary form of the root canal, and cause little canal transportation.

Key words: Ni-Ti instruments, CBCT, canal transportation, centring ratio

吴亚娟曹雪娇花荣马鸣魏昕. 不同镍钛器械预备根管后根尖偏移的CBCT比较研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2015, 35(5): 338-340.

参考文献

[1]Plotino G,Testarelli L,Al-Sudani D,et al.Fatigue resistance of rotaryinstruments manufactured usinf different nickel titanium alloys: acomparative study[J].Odontology,2014,102(1):31-35
[2]Haapasalo M,Shen Y.Evolution of nickel–titanium instrumentsfrom past to future[J].Endod Topics,2013,29:3-17
[3]钟素兰,尹仕海,陈朝辉,等.Micro-CT评价不同弯曲度根管预备后根尖偏移的实验研究[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2009,6:657-660
[4]赵楠，楚金普，闫波，刘学军.锥束CT评价两种镍钛器械预备后根管偏移的实验研究[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2011,21(12):683-686
[5]Gergi R,Rjeily JA,Sader J,Comparison of Canal Transportation andCentering Ability of Twisted Files,Pathfile-Protaper System,and StainlessSteel Hand k-Files Using Computed Tomography [J].[J].Endod,2010,36:904-
[6]Pettiett MT，Metzger Z，Philips C，et al.Endodontic Complication of rootcanal therapy performed by dental student stainess-steel k-file and nickel-itanium hand files[J].Endod,1999,25:230-234
[7]Hashem A,Ghoneim A,Lutfy R,Foda M,Fatah Omar G.Geo-metric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary Ni–Ti Shaping System[J].Endod,2012,38:996-1000
[8]Basrani B,Roth K,Sas G,Kishen A,Peters OA.Torsional pro-file of newand used Revo-S Rotary Instruments: an in vitro study[J].Endod,2011,37:989-92
[9]Haapasalo M,Shen Y.Evolution of nickel–titanium instruments from pasto future[J].Endod Topics,2013,29:3-17
[10]Pruett JP,Clement DJ,Carnes DL Jr.Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments[J ][J].Endod,1997,23:77-85
[11]Sonntag D，Ott M，Kook K.et alRoot canal preparation with the NiTi systems K3，Mtwo and ProTaper[J]..Aust Endod,2007,33(2):73-
[12]Imura N，Kato AS，Nove NF.A Comparison of Mesial Molar Root CanalPreparation Using Two Engine-Driven Instrument and the Balance-ForceTechnique[J].Endod,2001,27:627-631
[13]Versumer J，Hulsmann M，Schafer F.null A comparative study of root canalpreparation using Profile 04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instrument[J].IntEndo,2001,35:37-
[14]Barthel CR,Gruber S,Rouler JF.A new method to assess the result ofinstr-umentation technique in the root canal[J].Endod,1999,25:535-8
[15]Scha¨fer E,Bu¨rklein S.Impact of nickel–titanium of the root canal onclinical outcomes: a focused review[J].Odontology,2012,100:130-6
[16]Celik D,Tasdemir T,Er K.Comparative study of six rotary nickeltitaniumsystems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severelycurved root canals of extracted teeth[J].Endod,2013,39:278-82
[17]Elsherief SM,Zayet MK,Hamouda IM.Cone-beam computed tomographyanalysis of curved root canals after mechanical preparation with three nickel titanium rotary instruments[J]..Bio-med Res,2013,27:326-35
[18]?zer SY: Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography[J].Oral Surg OralMed Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011,111: 244-250
[19] HUA-XIONG CAI,SU?YACHEN,et al.Comparison of Hero 642 and K3rotary nickel?titanium files in curved canals of molars and canals of molars and a systematic review of the literature[J].Exp Ther Med.2014,8: 1047-1054
[20]Scha¨fer E,Erler M,Dammaschke T.Comparative study on the shapingability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instrumentPart 2. Cleaningeffectiveness and shaping ability severely curved root canals of extractedteeth[J].. Int Endod,2006,39:203-12
[21]Arbab-Chirani R,Chevalier V,Arbab-Chirani S,Calloch S.Comparativeanalysis of torsional and bending behaviour through finite-element modelsof 5 Ni–Ti endodontic instrument[J].Endod,2011,111:115-21
[22]Peters OA,Laib A,Gohring TN,Barbakow F.Changes in root canalgeometry after preparation assessed by high resolution computedtomography[J].Endod,2001,27:1-6