›› 2015, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 550-552.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同边缘设计椅旁CAD/CAM全瓷高嵌体修复的对比研究

陈岗,陈志飞,顾卫平,钟园   

  1. 南京医科大学附属口腔医院
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-17 修回日期:2014-12-23 出版日期:2015-07-28 发布日期:2015-08-04
  • 通讯作者: 顾卫平 E-mail:willim90@163.com

The comparative study of allceramic onlay restorations generated by chairside CAD/CAM with different margin designs

  • Received:2014-11-17 Revised:2014-12-23 Online:2015-07-28 Published:2015-08-04
  • Contact: Wei-Ping GU E-mail:willim90@163.com

摘要: [摘要] 目的 研究对接式和凹面肩台式边缘设计在椅旁CAD/CAM中的应用。方法 将144颗临床根管治疗术后的患牙随机分为两组:A组行对接式CAD/CAM高嵌体修复,B组行凹面肩台式CAD/CAM高嵌体修复,分析其边缘密合性,牙体、修复体折裂和脱落情况。结果 对接式边缘垂直间隙为(80.90±15.99)μm,凹面肩台式垂直间隙为(82.21±15.39)μm ,两组间无统计学差异(P >0.05)。6~12个月内随访,对接式和凹面肩台式高嵌体的修复体折裂率分别为0%和4.17%;两组牙体折裂率和修复体脱落率均为0%。结论 对接式和凹面肩台式边缘在临床上均为高嵌体的可适设计形式,而对接式设计既利于牙体保存又更为简便、易用。

关键词: CAD/CAM, 边缘设计, 对接式边缘, 凹面肩台式, 全瓷高嵌体

Abstract: Abstract: Objective To explore the application of different margin designs (edge to edge margin/concave shoulder margin) to chairside computeraided design/computeraided manufacturing (CAD/CAM).Methods 144 teeth with root canal therapy were randomized into group A that used CAD/CAM with an edge to edge margin design or group B that used CAD/CAM with a concave shoulder margin design.The marginal adaptation,and the fracture and falling off rates of teeth and allceramic onlay restorations were evaluated.Results With no statistical significance (P >0.05),the vertical marginal gap of group A was (80.90±15.99) μm,and that of group B was (82.21±15.39) μm.Followed up within 6 to 12 months,the fracture rate of restorations in group A and B was 0% and 4.17%,respectively.The falling off rate in both groups was 0%.Meanwhile,no teeth fell off or fractured in either group.Conclusions s Both the edge to edge margin and the concave shoulder margin are acceptable for CAD/CAM generated allceramic onlays,and the former is good for teeth and more convenient in clinic.

Key words: CAD/CAM, margin design, edge to edge margin, concave shoulder margin, all-ceramic onlay

中图分类号: