SUS2矫治器联合微螺钉支抗治疗安氏Ⅱ1类患者的临床研究

›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 1025-1028.

SUS2矫治器联合微螺钉支抗治疗安氏Ⅱ1类患者的临床研究

任继业,王文君

江门市口腔医院

收稿日期:2016-06-06 修回日期:2016-09-19 出版日期:2017-11-28 发布日期:2017-11-24
通讯作者: 任继业 E-mail:49454508@qq.com.cn

A clinical study of SUS2 appliance with miniscrew anchorage in early treatment of Class Ⅱ1 malocclusion

Received:2016-06-06 Revised:2016-09-19 Online:2017-11-28 Published:2017-11-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【摘要】目的：本文旨在研究SUS2功能矫治器联合种植体支抗治疗安氏Ⅱ1类下颌后缩患者的骨牙改变。方法：采用SUS2功能矫治器联合种植体支抗对15例安氏Ⅱ1类下颌后缩患者进行功能性矫治，治疗前后拍摄头颅侧位片进行头影测量分析，SPSS 16.0统计学软件进行t检验。结果：15例患儿矫治9～12个月，治疗前后SNB、Co-Gn明显增加（P＜0.01），ANB、Wits、U1.NA 、U1-NA、覆盖、覆牙合明显减小（P＜0.01）。结论：对生长发育高峰期Ⅱ1类错牙合患者，SUS2功能矫治器联合种植体支抗可以促进下颌骨生长,防止下前牙唇倾，改善覆牙合覆盖和磨牙关系。

关键词: 【关键词】安氏Ⅱ1类错牙合, 固定功能矫治器, SUS2, 微螺钉支抗

Abstract: 【Abstract】Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the skeletal and dental effects of the SUS2 appliance with miniscrew anchorage in growing children with skeletal Class II anomalies. Methods: Totally 15 subjects with skeletal Class Ⅱ1 Malocclusion were treated by SUS2 appliance in combination with miniscrew anchorage. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken at the beginning and end of functional therapy. Paired T-test was used to determine if there were significant differences by SPSS 16.0. Results: The 15 children had been treated for total 9-12 months. SNB、Co-Gn increased significantly, ANB、Wits、U1.NA 、U1-NA、Overjet、Overbite decreased significantly after treatment. Conclusions: The SUS2 appliance with miniscrew anchorage is useful in correction of Class II malocclusion, witout incisor proclination, during the treatment, and make the overjet,overbite and molar relationship become normal.

Key words: 【Key words】 Class II Division 1 malocclusion, Fixed functional appliance, SUS2 , Miniscrew anchorage

中图分类号:

R783.5

任继业王文君. SUS2矫治器联合微螺钉支抗治疗安氏Ⅱ1类患者的临床研究[J]. , 2017, 37(11): 1025-1028.

参考文献

1 邹冰爽，曾祥龙，曾应魁，等. 安氏II类错牙合颅面类型的研究 [J]. 口腔正畸学,1998,5(2) :61-64.
2 Aras A,Ada E,Saracoqlu H, et al. Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study[J]．Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop，2011，140(5) :616—625．
3 McNamara JA Jr．Components of ClassⅡmaloccusion in children 8-10 years of age[J]，Angle orthod ,1981,51(3):177-202．
4 Graber TM．口腔正畸功能矫形治疗学[M]．徐芸，译．2版．北京：人民卫生出版社，2004：297．
5 尹玉承，兰泽栋．固定功能矫治器[J]，广东牙病防治 2007 15(3) :137-138．
6 Al-Jewair, TS, Preston, CB, Moll EM.et al. A comparison of the MARA and the AdvanSync functional appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion[J]. Angle Orthodontist,2012,82(5) : 907–914．
7 魏竹亮，周力，易炜，等，头帽肌激动器和普通功能矫治器矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类错殆上下牙列变化的初步探讨[J]，现代口腔医学杂志，2010，24(2):99-102．
8 任继业，史建陆，王文君，等，Pancherz分析法评价两种功能矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ1类错牙合患者的效果[J]，广东牙病防治，2014,22(4):186-188．
9　Bock, NC, Reiser B. Ruf S. Class II subdivision treatment with the Herbst appliance[J]. Angle Orthodontist，2013，83(2) :327–333．
10 林新平，林久祥，王剑锋，等．种植体型功能矫治器对颅面部生长作用的三维结构分析[J]，上海口腔医学，2008，17(1):71-76．
11 Mevlut Celikoglu1, Tuba Unal1, Mehmet Bayram1,et al，Treatment of a skeletal Class II malocclusion using fixed functional appliance with miniplate anchorage[J]. European Journal of Dentistry，2014，8(2):276-280．
12 陈晓敏，洪弘，郑金绚，等．Johnston分析法评价SUS2矫治Ⅱ类错牙合的效果[J]，临床口腔医学杂志，2014，30(12):755-758．
13 Mehmet Oguz Oztoprak，Didem Nalbantgil，Ayhan Uyanlar，et al．A cephalometric comparative study of class II correction with Sabbagh Universal Spring (SUS2) and Forsus FRD appliances[J]．European Journal of Dentistry， 2012，6(3) :302-310．
14 Flores-Mir C，Ayeh A，Goswani A，et al．Skeletal and dental changes in classII division I malocclusions treated with splint-type Herbst appliances[J]．Angle Orthod，2007，77(2):376–381．
15 H?gg U， Rabie AB， Bendeus M，et al．Condylar growth and mandibular positioning with stepwise vs maximum advancement[J]．Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop，2008，134(4):525–536．