氟保护漆联合窝沟封闭对第一恒磨牙防龋的效果评估

›› 2017, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7): 629-631.

氟保护漆联合窝沟封闭对第一恒磨牙防龋的效果评估

段君兰¹,刘宗响¹,张洪永²,韩爱军³,王鹏来¹

1. 徐州市口腔医院
2. 徐州市卫生和计划生育委员会疾控处
3. 3徐州市口腔医院牙体牙髓科

收稿日期:2016-08-24 修回日期:2016-10-19 出版日期:2017-07-28 发布日期:2017-07-18
通讯作者: 段君兰 E-mail:286945422@qq.com
基金资助:
江苏省卫生厅预防医学基金科研课题

Evaluation of the anti-caries Effect on the first permanent molars by fluoride protector combined with pit and fissure seal

Received:2016-08-24 Revised:2016-10-19 Online:2017-07-28 Published:2017-07-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：评估氟保护漆联合窝沟封闭对第一恒磨牙防龋的效果；方法：选取6-8岁的儿童300名，共纳入1200颗牙齿采取自身对照方法实施窝沟封闭、窝沟封闭联合氟保护漆，于6、12、18、24个月观察并分析两组窝沟封闭保留率及龋病发病率情况。结果：各个时间段试验组较对照组具有更高的窝沟封闭保留率、更低的龋病发病率，经统计学分析，12个月、18个月的龋病发病率及2年的患龋率在两组之间具有统计学意义（P<0.05），2年后试验组与对照组相比龋降低率为61.3%。结论：本研究提示在窝沟封闭的基础上联合氟保护漆较单纯窝沟封闭具有更好的龋病预防效果。

关键词: 氟保护漆, 窝沟封闭, 第一恒磨牙

Abstract: Abstract ：Objective: analysis of the effect of fluoride protector joint fissure sealants on the prevention of the first molar caries; Methods:1,200 teeth of 300 aged 6-8 children were included in this research and were just given pit and fissure sealant or combine fluor protector with self control method. The retention of pit and fissure sealant, caries incidence rate and caries prevalence rate were observed and analyzed at 6,12,18,24 months. Results ：The results showed that test group has a higher retention of pit and fissure sealant and lower caries incidence rate than control group at each time. After analysis,it were found that the caries incidence rate in 12,18months and the caries prevalence rate in 2years have statistically significant (P <0.05). Compared to control group,the caries reduction rate of the test group is 61.3% after 2years.Conclusion: This research suggest that pit and fissure sealant combine with fluor protector could have better curies prevention effect than pit and fissure sealant single.

Key words: fluoride protector, fissure sealants, the first molar

中图分类号:

R788.1

段君兰刘宗响张洪永韩爱军王鹏来. 氟保护漆联合窝沟封闭对第一恒磨牙防龋的效果评估[J]. , 2017, 37(7): 629-631.

[1]	汪伟佳张晓丹曹玉慧姜玲玲袁杰肖睿. 7-9周岁第一恒磨牙窝沟封闭效果的分析[J]. , 2019, 39(3): 235-239.
[2]	吴珊珊刘秋林古家娜周恺燕陈少勇曾晓娟. 第一恒磨牙局部涂氟防龋效果3年纵向研究[J]. , 2019, 39(1): 56-59.
[3]	熊正慧韩光政陈亚明. 苏州市姑苏区7～9岁儿童龋病流行病学调查[J]. , 2018, 35(9): 830-833.
[4]	李秀秀张磊王晓斐张晓丹杨星民曹艳艳袁杰. 2016年哈尔滨市香坊区8周岁城镇小学生龋病流行状况调查[J]. , 2018, 38(3): 268-272.
[5]	安源远张凯航李永祥. 舟山市1035名小学二年级学生第一恒磨牙龋病调查分析[J]. , 2017, 37(12): 1108-1110.
[6]	王辉徐龙博张月云赵丽侠熊世江. 变异式保持器治疗第一恒磨牙异位萌出的临床应用[J]. , 2016, 36(8): 726-728.
[7]	刘怡然吴晓晗周红艳沈红沈家平. 第一恒磨牙窝沟封闭3年临床效果观察[J]. , 2016, 36(8): 749-752.
[8]	韩静于洪波焦菲菲. 光固化流体树脂窝沟封闭防龋疗效的评价[J]. , 2016, 36(2): 132-134.
[9]	蔡蔚高祯王奕霍东婷. 窝沟封闭和氟保护漆预防学生恒牙龋的疗效观察[J]. , 2016, 36(11): 1037-1039.
[10]	谢妮娜宋文婷魏路明刘宗响. 磷酸酸蚀结合流动树脂对年轻恒牙窝沟封闭的疗效分析[J]. , 2015, 35(12): 1045-1047.
[11]	高朗. 应用窝沟封闭剂预防畸形中央尖折断的疗效观察[J]. , 2013, 33(5): 353-354.
[12]	沈红胡德渝. 定量光激发荧光技术检测乳磨牙窝沟封闭效果的临床研究[J]. , 2013, 33(3): 148-150.
[13]	田玉楼,王鑫,王坤,刘芳. 应用PAR指数评价拔除龋坏第一恒磨牙的矫治效果[J]. , 2012, 32(7): 403-405,425.
[14]	周铸民,丁桂聪,陈晶,宋宁,王骥. 复合树脂嵌体修复儿童第一恒磨牙缺损的临床观察[J]. , 2012, 32(7): 409-411.
[15]	周红艳,刘茜,王珏,杨颜菁,梅予锋. 唾液污染后再处理对窝沟封闭边缘封闭性能影响的研究[J]. , 2012, 32(10): 589-592.