两种外科动力钻在微创拔牙中的联合应用

›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (12): 1114-1117.

两种外科动力钻在微创拔牙中的联合应用

钱庆慰¹,王玫²,马宏涛¹

1. 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院
2. 济宁医学院附属湖西医院口腔科

收稿日期:2018-03-28 修回日期:2018-05-21 出版日期:2018-12-28 发布日期:2018-12-17
通讯作者: 马宏涛 E-mail:mht1493@sina.com

Combined application of two kinds of surgical burs in minimally invasive tooth extraction

Received:2018-03-28 Revised:2018-05-21 Online:2018-12-28 Published:2018-12-17
Contact: Hong-Tao MA E-mail:mht1493@sina.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　研究两种外科动力钻在微创拔牙中的联合应用。方法：60例埋伏牙通过CBCT准确定位，利用气动式外科专用切割手机联合Komet外科磨骨球钻精确去骨；联合Komet外科分牙车针彻底分牙，微创拔除患牙。结果：60例患牙均成功拔除，手术时间8~35 min，平均18 min。所有患者术后均无明显肿痛，无1例患者发生术后感染、舌麻木、邻牙损伤等并发症，伤口均一期愈合。结论：使用气动式外科专用切割手机联合Komet磨骨球钻去骨，加长型裂钻分牙，拔除口腔各类埋伏阻生牙，微创高效，适合推广。

关键词: 外科动力钻, 气动式外科专用切割手机, 微创拔牙

Abstract: Objective To study the combined application of the extraction of impacted teeth with two kinds of surgical burs. Methods After CBCT examination, 60 impacted teeth were extracted by minimally invasive technique with surgical impact air handpiece and Komet burs. The surgical round bur would be used for accurate osteotomy, and the surgical fissure bur for sectioning the tooth. Results 60 patients were extracted successfully in 8-35 min (18 min on average). No complications occurred, such as severe swelling, wound infection, numbness of tongue or root injury. All wounds healed in one stage. Conclusion The deeply impacted teeth extraction with 2 kinds of surgical burs is safe and feasible, which improves the surgical efficiency and reduces the morbidity rates effectively, and is suitable for promotion.

Key words: surgical bur, surgical impact air handpiece, minimally invasive extraction

中图分类号:

R739.8

钱庆慰王玫马宏涛. 两种外科动力钻在微创拔牙中的联合应用[J]. , 2018, 38(12): 1114-1117.

参考文献

[1]秦瑞峰, 刘伟, 马洋.微创拔牙理念及操作技巧[J].中华口腔医学杂志, 2014, 49(11):698-699
[2] 胡开进.口腔外科门诊手术操作规范[M]. 2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 45-47.
[3]叶周熹, 杨驰.减轻下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术后反应的手术措施[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志电子版, 2014, 8(3):57-60
[4]Mavrodi A, Ohanyan A, Kechagias N, et al.Influence of two different surgical techniques on the difficulty of impacted lower third molar extraction and their post-operative complications[J].Medicina Oral Patolog??a Oral Y Cirug??a Bucal, 2015, 20(5):e640-
[5]缪耀强, 郭泽鸿.下颌第三磨牙水平阻生导致第二磨牙远中根严重吸收的正畸治疗[J].中华口腔正畸学杂志, 2013, 20(4):221-224
[6]Kilpatrick HC.Removal of impacted third molars utilizingspeeds up to 200,000 rp.m[J].Oral Surg Oral Med OralPathol, 1958, 11(4):364-369
[7]Yalcin S, Aktas I, Emes Y, et al.A technique for atraumatic extraction of teeth before immediate implant placement[J].Implant Dent, 2009, 18(6):464-472
[8]Mozzati M, Gallesio G, Ullio L, et al.Patient-based assessment of tooth extraction with ultrasonic dental surgery[J].J Craniofac Surg, 2014, 25(6):2081-2083
[9]刘平，胡开进，马洋，丁宇翔.外科拔牙器械的选择及应用[J].中国实用口腔科杂志, 2016, 9(11):581-584
[10]胡开进, 李永锋, 吴迪.微动力系统在牙拔除术中的应用[J].华西口腔医学杂志, 2015, 33(1):1-5
[11]Dodson T.Prevention and treatment of dry socket[J].Evid Based Dent, 2013, 14(1):13-14
[12]Corrêa AP, Faverani LP, Ramalho-Ferreira G, et al.Unerupted lower third molar extractions and their risks for mandibular fracture[J].J Craniofac Surg, 2014, 25(3):e228-229
[13]赵吉宏, 黄从发.现代牙槽外科新技术[J].华西口腔医学杂志, 2014, 32(2):213-216
[14]吴带生, 陈俊兰, 彭伟.超声骨刀和涡轮手机在复杂下颌阻生智齿拔除中的临床应用[J].中国医学创新, 2017, 14(24):10-13
[15]吴昌敬, 邵军, 蔡剑林.超声骨刀联合高速涡轮机拔除下颌埋伏第三磨牙的临床应用[J].口腔颌面外科杂志, 2016, 26(1):38-41
[16]Miyamoto I, Kaneuji T, Shinya K, et al.A Sectioning Technique for Extraction of Impacted Third Molar by Using a Straight Handpiece and Carbide Bur: Case Report[J].Open Journal of Stomatology, 2015, 5(12):287-292
[17]Waknis P, Jadaun A, Mishra T, et al.Use of 20mm drill bit for intraoral removal of ectopically positioned teeth[J].Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine & Pathology, 2015, 27(4):498-499
[18]马宏涛，韩俊力.定位和微创技术在上颌前牙区埋伏牙拔除术中的应用[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2015, 13(4):367-369
[19]Steel B.Lingual split versus surgical bur technique in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2012, 114(3):294-302
[20]蒋才丽.气动式外科专用切割手机拔除下颌低位阻生智齿的应用效果评价[J].口腔医学, 2018, 38(3):259-262