透明托盘结合生物活性玻璃对诊室漂白治疗所致牙齿敏感的疗效评价

›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 1017-1021.

透明托盘结合生物活性玻璃对诊室漂白治疗所致牙齿敏感的疗效评价

马骞¹,宋海洋²,李次会³,陈亚明¹

1. 南京医科大学附属口腔医院
2. 南京医科大学
3. 北京大清生物技术有限公司

收稿日期:2019-05-14 修回日期:2019-06-04 出版日期:2019-11-28 发布日期:2019-12-04
通讯作者: 马骞 E-mail:archie2004@163.com
基金资助:
含45S5BGs的引导骨组织再生膜抗菌性能及其机制研究

The effects evaluation of BGs and Transparent tray desensitizer application prior to in-office bleaching

Received:2019-05-14 Revised:2019-06-04 Online:2019-11-28 Published:2019-12-04
Contact: Qian MA E-mail:archie2004@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究在诊室漂白治疗前，不同方式使用生物活性玻璃脱敏剂对患者牙齿漂白性敏感的发生率以及敏感程度的影响。方法 45位受试者根据生物活性玻璃脱敏剂使用方式随机分为A、B、C3组，每组15人。A组采用涂抹法，B组使用透明托盘，C组为空白对照组不使用脱敏剂。每例患者的6颗上前牙作为观察单位。分别对3组受试者在漂白治疗术后即刻、24h、48h采用视觉模拟疼痛量表（VAS）进行牙齿敏感性的评估，对各组患者漂白治疗后牙齿敏感的发生率以及敏感程度进行统计学分析。结果术后即刻实验A组33.33%的患者和实验B组13.33%的患者出现了漂白性敏感症状，VAS评分的平均值分别为0.33±0.49、0.13±0.35，而对照组C组有86.67%患者出现漂白性敏感症状，VAS评分的平均值为1.53±0.82，术后即刻A、B两组与C组VAS平均值及敏感发生率均有统计学差异（P＜0.05）；术后24h，敏感发生率A、B组均为0，C组为40%，A、B组的VAS平均值为0，C组的VAS平均值为0.47±0.63，A、B两组与C组的VAS平均值和敏感发生率均有统计学差异（P＜0.05）；术后48h，AB组的敏感发生率均为0，C组敏感发生率为6.67%，C组的VAS平均值为0.07±0.25，3组的VAS平均值以及敏感发生率无差异（P＞0.05）。结论生物活性玻璃脱敏剂以及透明托盘的使用可以显著减轻患者诊室漂白治疗术后的敏感症状，降低牙齿敏感的发生率。

关键词: 诊室漂白, 生物活性玻璃脱敏剂, 透明托盘

Abstract: Objective To compare the effects of different treatment methods before in-office bleaching to investigate the occurrence rate and level of teeth bleaching sensitivity with bioactive glasses (BGs) application. Methods 45 subjects were randomized into 3 groups. In group A, all subjects were applied with BGs desensitizer. In group B, all subjects were applied with transparent tray and BGs desensitizer. Group C was the control group, without any desensitizer application. In every subject, the conditions of 6 front teeth were observed. Desensitizer applications were used in group A and B, while no desensitizer treatment in group C. Sensitivity scores [recorded on a 10-point visual-analog scale (VAS)] were determined right after, 24 h, 48 h after the bleaching treatment in group A, B and C. The data of occurrence rate and level of teeth bleaching sensitivity with BSG application were analyzed and compared statistically. Results Bleaching sensitivity occurred in 33.33% of the subjects in Group A (Right after) and 13.33% of the subjects in Group B (VAS mean scores: 0.33±0.49, 0.13±0.35). Bleaching sensitivity occurred in 86.67% of the subjects in Group C (Right after) (VAS score: 1.53±0.82). There were significant statistical differences between VAS mean values of A, B and C right after group (P<0.05).24 hours after treatment, bleaching sensitivity occurred in 0% of the subjects in Group A and B, and 40% of the subjects in Group C (VAS score: 0.47±0.63). There were significant statistical differences between VAS mean values of A, B and C 24 h group (P<0.05). 48 hours after treatment, bleaching sensitivity occurred in 0% of the subjects in Group A and B, and 6.67% of the subjects in Group C (VAS score: 0.07±0.25). Bleaching sensitivity occurred in 86.67% of the subjects in Group C (Right after) (VAS score: 1.53±0.82). There were no significant statistical differences between VAS mean values of A, B and C 48 h group (P>0.05). Conclusion The application of BGs and transparent tray desensitizer may significantly reduce the occurrence rate of bleaching sensitivity and alleviate the symptoms.

Key words: In-office bleaching, BGs desensitizer, transparent tray

中图分类号:

R783.1

马骞宋海洋李次会陈亚明. 透明托盘结合生物活性玻璃对诊室漂白治疗所致牙齿敏感的疗效评价[J]. , 2019, 39(11): 1017-1021.

参考文献 26

[1]	Carey CM.Whitening: what we now know[J].The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice, 2014, 14(14):70-76
[2]	Joiner A.The bleaching of teeth: a review of the literature[J].Journal of Dentistry, 2006, 34(34):412-419
[3]	Joiner A.Whitening toothpastes: a review of the literature[J].Journal of Dentistry, 2010, 38(38):17-24
[4]	Pale′ M, Mayoral JR, Llopis J, Valle`s M et al.Evaluation of the effectiveness of an in-office bleaching system and the effect of potassium nitrate as a desensitizing agent[J].Odontology, 2014, 102(102):203-210
[5]	Papathanasiou A, Barwell D, Kugel G.A clinical study evaluating a new chairside and take-home whitening system[J].Compend Contin Educ Dent , 2001, 22(22):289-294
[6]	Kugel G, Papathanasiou A, Williams AJ et al.Clinical evaluation of chemical and light-activated tooth whitening systems[J].Compend Contin Educ Dent , 2006, 27(27):54-62
[7]	Reinhardt JW, Elvins SE, Swift EJ, Denehy GE.A clinical study of nightguard vital bleaching[J].Quintessence Int, 1993, 24(24):379-384
[8]	Sterret J, Price RB, Bankey T.Effects of home bleaching on the tissues of the oral cavity[J].J Can Dent Assoc, 1995, 61(61):412-420
[9]	Haywood VB, Leonard RH, Nelson CE, Brunson WD.Effectiveness, side effects and long-term status of nightguard vital bleaching[J].J Am Dent Assoc, 1994, 125(125):1219-1226
[10]	Leonard RH, Haywood VB, Phillips C.[J]. , 1997(28):527–34.[J].Quintessence Int, 1997, 28(28):527-534
[11]	Browning WD, Chan DC, Myers ML, Brackett WW et al.Comparison of traditional and low sensitivity whiteners[J].Oper DenT , 2008, 33(33):379-385
[12]	Trindade FZ, RibeiroAP, SaconoNT et al., 2009(42):516–524.[J].Int Endod J, 2009, 42(42):516-524
[13]	马骞，乔萍丽，陈亚明 .透明托盘法使用生物活性玻璃对牙髓腔渗透性的影响[[J].口腔医学, 2018, 38(5):428-432
[14]	Haywood VB.Treating sensitivity during tooth whitening[J].Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2005, 26(9 Suppl. 3):11-20
[15]	M. Br?nnstromL.A. Linden, G. Johnson.Movement of dentinal and pulpal fluid caused by clinical procedures[J].J. Dent. Res, 1968, 47(47):679-682
[16]	Giniger M, MacDonald J, Ziemba S, Felix H.The clinical performance of professionally dispensed bleaching gel with added amorphous calcium phosphate[J].J Am Dent Assoc, 2005, 136(3):383-92
[17]	Willian D.Browning,Sopanis DCho et al. Effect of a Nano-Hydroxyapatite Paste on Bleaching-Related Tooth Sensitivity[J].Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2012, 24(4):268-276
[18]	Kugel G, Ferreira S, Sharma S, Barker ML et al.Clinical trial assessing light enhancement of in-office tooth whitening[J].Journal of Esthetic & Restorative Dentistry, 2009, 21(5):336-347
[19]	Ontiveros JC ， Paravina RD [J]. 37(11): 840-847.[J].Journal of Dentistry, 2009, 37(11):840-874
[20]	Al-Omari Q, El Daraa E. A randomized clinical trial of in-office dental bleaching with or without light activation[J].Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 2010, 11(1):17-24
[21]	Mehta D, Venkata S, Naganath M, et al.Clinical trial of tooth desensitization prior to in-office bleaching[J].Eur J Oral Sci, 2013, 121(121):477-481
[22]	Du Min Q，Bian Z，Jiang et al.Clinical evaluation of a dentifrice containing calcium sodium phosphosilicate (novamin) for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity[J].Am J Dent, 2008, 21(4):210-214
[23]	Qian Ma, Tianda Wang, Qingfei Meng et al , 2017, 60: 63-69.Comparison of in vitro dentinal tubule occluding efficacy of two different methods using a nano-scaled bioactive glass-containing desensitising agent[J].Journal of Dentistry, 2017, 60(60):63-69
[24]	Ziebolz D，Helms K，Hanning C et al.Efficacy an oral side effects of two highly concentrated tray?based bleaching systems[J].Clin Oral Investing, 2007, 11(3):267-275
[25]	Markowitz K.Pretty painful: why does tooth bleaching hurt?[J].Med Hypotheses, 2010, 74(5):835-840
[26]	Pintado-Palomino K, Filho OP, Zanotto ED, Tirapelli C.A clinical, randomized, controlled study on the use of desensitizing agents during tooth bleaching [J].J Dent, 2015, 43(9):1099-1105