›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 1038-1041.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同医生利用CBCT和数字化牙片测量牙齿长度的准确性研究

赵娜1,陈鑫2,周广超3,孙超4,许小会5,吴大明6   

  1. 1. 南京医科大学附属口腔医院正畸科
    2. 南京医科大学附属口腔医院口腔颌面外科
    3. 南京医科大学口腔医学研究所
    4. 南京医科大学口腔医学研究所,南京医科大学附属口腔医院
    5. 南京医科大学附属口腔医院第一门诊部
    6. 江苏省口腔医院
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-19 修回日期:2019-07-06 出版日期:2019-11-28 发布日期:2019-12-04
  • 通讯作者: 赵娜 E-mail:873464395@qq.com

Accuracy of the cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiographs for measurement of tooth length by different doctors

  • Received:2019-02-19 Revised:2019-07-06 Online:2019-11-28 Published:2019-12-04

摘要: 目的 评价不同医生利用锥形束CT(cone-beam computed tomography,CBCT)和数字化牙片(digital periapical radiographs,DPRs)测量牙齿长度的准确性。方法 需拔牙的正畸患者拍摄CBCT,共46名患者82颗前磨牙纳入研究。由两名医生分别利用CBCT自带软件从轴位(axial planes,APs)、矢状位(sagittal planes,SPs)和冠状位(coronal planes,CPs)测量牙齿的长度。牙齿拔出后,利用游标卡尺测量牙齿长度作为金标准。然后将牙齿放入人干头颅的相应牙槽窝内,分角线技术拍摄DPRs,并测量牙齿长度。比较每位医生利用CBCT和DPRs 测量牙齿长度的准确性。结果 单根前磨牙,CBCT-APs、SPs和CPs的测量值均低估了牙齿长度,但差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05), 而DPRs测量值显著高估了牙齿长度(P < 0.05)。双根前磨牙,CBCT-APs测量值高估了牙齿长度,CBCT-SPs 和CPs 测量值低估了牙齿长度,但差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。DPRs测量值显著低估了颊根的长度,高估了腭根的长度(P < 0.05)。 两名观察者之间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。 结论 不同医生利用CBCT测量牙齿长度均显示较高的可信度和可重复性。

关键词: 准确性, 锥形束CT, 数字化牙片, 牙齿测量

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital periapical radiographs (DPRs) for teeth length measurements by different doctors. Methods 46 CBCT images and 82 premolars were collected from the patients who were go?ing to undergo orthodontic treatment and would require premolar extractions. The teeth length measurements made by digital caliper was considered as the gold standard. The teeth length was measured by CBCT software on axial planes (APs), sagittal planes (SPs) and coronal planes (CPs) by two doctors respectively. Then the extracted teeth were matched the corresponding location of a dry skull. Standardized bisecting angle DPRs were taken of all the teeth and were then measured by the two doctors. Accuracy of teeth length made by CBCT and DPRs were compared to each other. Results For single-rooted premolars, the CBCT measurements underestimated the tooth length at every plane with no statistical significance (P > 0.05), while DPRs measurements overestimated the tooth length significantly (P < 0.05). For two-rooted premolars, the CBCT-APs measurements overestimated the teeth length, but the CBCT-SPs and CBCT-CPs underestimated the teeth length. However, these differences had not statistical significance (P > 0.05). The DPRs measurements underestimated the buccal length but overestimated the palatal length significantly (P < 0.05). There was no statistical significance between the two doctors (P > 0.05). Conclusion CBCT teeth length measurements show a strong correlation with the gold standard at every plane by different doctors, which indicated the high reliability and reproducibility of CBCT measurements.

Key words: Accuracy, Cone beam computed tomography, digital periapical radiographs, tooth measurement