2种用于根管治疗后牙体修复树脂的临床疗效对比分析

›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 819-822.

2种用于根管治疗后牙体修复树脂的临床疗效对比分析

李鑫¹,张宁¹,杨卫东²

1. 南京市口腔医院
2. 南京大学医学院附属口腔医院南京市口腔医院

收稿日期:2018-06-29 修回日期:2018-09-17 出版日期:2019-09-28 发布日期:2019-09-17
通讯作者: 杨卫东 E-mail:ywdong2001@163.com

Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy of two kinds of resin for filling repair of maxillary first molar after root canal treatment

Received:2018-06-29 Revised:2018-09-17 Online:2019-09-28 Published:2019-09-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的观察比较根管治疗后,Z350纳米数脂与sonicfill声波树脂充填修复上颌第一磨牙牙体缺损的临床疗效。方法将门诊完成根管治疗后并且余留牙体量足够的上颌第一磨牙40颗随机平均分为A、B组，A 组采用Z350纳米树脂修复；B 组采用sonicfill声波树脂修复。于修复后即刻及12个月对患牙进行检查和随访，参照美国公共卫生署修复体评价标准对其缺损的临床修复效果进行评价。结果上颌第一磨牙根管治疗后的牙体树脂修复即刻及12月后两组修复效果无显著差异。结论 2种树脂均适用于余留牙体量足够的上颌第一磨牙根管治疗后的牙体缺损修复，其中sonicfill声波树脂充填操作时间明显占优。

关键词: 树脂, 根管治疗后, 临床疗效

Abstract: Objective To observe and compare the clinical effects of Z350 and sonicfill resin filling in the treatment of maxillary first molar defect. Methods The maxillary first molars were left after the root canal treatment in the outpatient department. Forty samples were randomly divided into group A and group B. Group A was repaired with Z350, while group B was repaired with sonicfill. The two groups of patients were examined and followed up immediately and 12 months after the repair, and the clinical repair effect of the defects was evaluated by referring to the evaluation criteria of the prosthesis of the United States department of public health. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in the repair effect immediately and 12 months after the treatment of maxillary first molar root canal. Conclusion Both resins are suitable for the repair of dental defects after the treatment of maxillary first molar root canal with sufficient residual tooth volume, in which sonicfill resin filling operation time is obviously superior.

Key words: resin, after root canal treatment, clinical curative effect

中图分类号:

R781.05

李鑫张宁杨卫东. 2种用于根管治疗后牙体修复树脂的临床疗效对比分析[J]. , 2019, 39(9): 819-822.

[1]	刘园园李娴静熊成立郝爽王景云. 超薄瓷贴面的临床应用进展[J]. , 2019, 39(5): 477-480.
[2]	杨路陈冰卓陈晨孟虹良何峰谢海峰张怀勤. 一种自粘接树脂水门汀与氧化锆陶瓷粘接的耐久性评价[J]. , 2019, 39(5): 390-394.
[3]	陈冰卓陈晨陈莹何峰张怀勤谢海峰. Bis-GMA树脂基材料40秒光照条件的聚合度分析[J]. , 2019, 39(5): 395-399.
[4]	邢春霞聂蓉蓉孟翔峰杨洁. 不同牙体预备车针所致玷污层对自粘接型树脂水门汀粘结强度的影响[J]. , 2019, 39(5): 423-426.
[5]	周贯华姜明欣吕欣欣姜雄英. 玻璃纤维桩修复重度楔状缺损的临床观察[J]. , 2019, 39(3): 228-230.
[6]	唐婉娴刘桂英. 3种方法修复前磨牙楔状缺损的疗效比较[J]. , 2019, 39(1): 52-55.
[7]	马春敏沈晴昳黄伟昊卢海红. everStick高强纤维对上颌中切牙树脂贴面抗折力和折裂模式的影响[J]. , 2019, 39(1): 10-14.
[8]	姜雪高平魏茜茜张晓萌徐通赵颀朱松. 大块充填树脂的研究进展[J]. , 2019, 39(1): 89-92.
[9]	连宁朱洪光王晓钰孙晨雨梁椿怡白建文. 三种镍钛再治疗锉去除根充物操作时间及清除率的比较研究[J]. , 2019, 39(1): 40-43.
[10]	吕雪芹许建辉. 流体树脂和玻璃离子充填乳磨牙邻面早期龋的疗效分析[J]. , 2018, 38(8): 717-719.
[11]	刘方宇聂蓉蓉孟翔峰许少平. 不同流动性复合树脂核材料在短时超光强照射下的聚合效果[J]. , 2018, 38(6): 495-498.
[12]	杨久慧李强陈永进. 激光治疗牙本质过敏症的研究进展[J]. , 2018, 38(3): 277-280.
[13]	马宏伟刘政君王津惠. 楔状缺损充填治疗的研究进展[J]. , 2018, 38(3): 285-288.
[14]	朱明月魏宁石旭旭朴国宾赵跃峰陈群芬. E-max瓷块厚度及颜色对光固化树脂固化率的影响[J]. , 2018, 38(2): 135-137.
[15]	陈勇闵丽. 机用镍钛器械与超声根管冲洗联合应用于慢性根尖周炎一次性根管治疗的临床研究[J]. , 2018, 38(2): 162-165.