›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 894-899.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

上颌无牙颌固定修复中5颗不同倾斜角度种植体的三维有限元分析

郭海波1,汤春波1,周储伟2,周逃林2   

  1. 1. 南京医科大学附属口腔医院
    2. 南京航空航天大学
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-17 修回日期:2020-03-09 出版日期:2020-10-28 发布日期:2020-10-28
  • 通讯作者: 汤春波 E-mail:cbtang@njmu.edu.cn

3D finite element analysis of different inclined-angle implants in fixed dentures on edentulous maxilla

  • Received:2020-02-17 Revised:2020-03-09 Online:2020-10-28 Published:2020-10-28

摘要: [摘要]目的 利用三维有限元分析法,分析在单侧恒定静态力加载条件下,5种不同倾斜种植体数目及不同倾斜角度对种植体及骨组织应力分布的影响。方法 在无牙颌的上颌骨内,自右至左上颌设计1~5号共5颗种植体,恒定种植体的植入位置。通过逆向工程建模方法,利用3D CaMega光学三维扫描系统扫描Bego种植体和基台实体,最后把获取的逆向特征参数利用正向建模工具构造出种植体和基台的实体模型。以不同倾斜角度建立6种模型。模型Ⅰ:种植体轴向倾斜0°;模型Ⅱ:1号、5号远中倾斜30°;模型Ⅲ:1号、2号、4号、5号远中倾斜15°;模型Ⅳ:1号、5号种植体远中倾斜30°,2号、4号远中倾斜15°;模型Ⅴ:1号、2号、4号、5号远中倾斜30°;模型Ⅵ:1号、5号远中倾斜15°,2号、4号近中倾斜15°;模型Ⅰ~Ⅵ 3号种植体轴向均倾斜0°。对模型15牙位加载300 N载荷,分析种植体表面和骨组织表面的综合应力。结果 1号种植体表面最大应力值模型Ⅰ<Ⅳ<Ⅴ<Ⅱ<Ⅲ<Ⅵ,模型Ⅱ~Ⅵ分别较模型Ⅰ增高了28.17%,45.70%,7.90%,22.33%和57.04%。3号种植体表面最大应力值模型Ⅰ最高,模型Ⅱ至Ⅵ分别降低了29.19%,43.62%,23.48%,20.46%和16.44%。以模型Ⅰ的1号种植体骨组织表面的最大Mise应力值为基准,模型Ⅱ~Ⅳ的1号种植体骨组织表面应力值分别下降了10.12%,58.22%,18.35%,模型Ⅴ和Ⅵ分别升高了57.59%和12.65%。结论 上颌骨无牙颌种植固定修复中,非对称增加远中向倾斜种植体的角度,有利于获得更好的应力分布,前牙区种植体的对称远中向倾斜会明显地减少前牙区种植体和骨组织表面的应力,也会降低前牙区骨吸收以及固定义齿折断的风险。

关键词: 倾斜种植体, 三维有限元, 应力分析, 无牙颌

Abstract: Objective To analyze the effect of different numbers and different angles of inclined implants on the stress distribution of implants and bone tissue by three-dimensional finite element analysis under the condition of constant static force loading. Methods Six models with different inclined-angle implants which were named No.1-5 from right to left in edentulous maxilla were designed. The implant placement sites were fixed. Through the reverse engineering modeling method, the 3D CaMega optical 3D scanning system was used to scan the Bego implant and abutment entities. Finally, the obtained reverse feature parameters were constructed using forward modeling tools to construct a solid model of the implant and abutment. Model Ⅰ: No.1-5 implant axial tilted 0 degree; Model Ⅱ: No.1 and No.5 implant were distal tilted 30 degrees, the rest of the implants axial tilted 0 degrees; Model Ⅲ: No.1, 2, 4and No.5 were distal tilted 15 degrees, and the rest of the implants axial tilted 0 degrees; Model Ⅳ: No.1 and No.5 were distal tilted 30 degrees, No.2 and No.4 were distal tilted 15 degrees, and the rest of the implants axial tilted 0 degrees. Model Ⅴ: No.1, 2, 4 and No.5 were distal titled 30 degrees. Model Ⅵ:No.1, 5 were distal titled 30 degrees. No.2, 4 were miso titled 15 degrees. The stress of the implant surface and bone tissue surface was analyzed by loading 300 N load on the 15 teeth. Results Models of maximum stress values on the surface of No.1 implant were Ⅰ<Ⅳ<Ⅴ<Ⅱ<Ⅲ<Ⅵ, and models Ⅱ to Ⅵ increased by 28.17%, 45.70%, 7.90%, 22.33%, and 57.04%, respectively, compared with model I. The maximum stress value on the surface of implant No. 3 was the highest in model Ⅰ, which decreased by 29.19%, 43.62%, 23.48%, 20.46%, and 16.44%, respectively. Based on the maximum Mise stress value of the surface of bone tissue No. 1 in model I, the surface stress values of bone tissue No.1 in models Ⅱto Ⅵ decreased by 10.12%, 58.22%, and 18.35%, respectively, and those of models Ⅴand Ⅵ increased 57.59% and 12.65% respectively. Conclusion In maxillary toothless jaw fixed prosthesis, the asymmetry adds the angle of the distal inclined implant, which is conducive to obtaining better stress distribution. The symmetrical distal inclination of the implant in the anterior dental area will significantly reduce stress on the surface of the dental implant and bone tissue, and will also reduce the risk of bone resorption in the anterior dental area and fixed denture fracture.

Key words: edentulous maxillary, 3D finite element analysis, incline implant, stress analysis

中图分类号: