两种牙齿美白方法治疗中重度氟斑牙的临床效果对比

›› 2020, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 723-727.

两种牙齿美白方法治疗中重度氟斑牙的临床效果对比

杨丽媛,刘冠邑,赵凌

山东大学口腔医院

收稿日期:2020-01-13 修回日期:2020-03-04 出版日期:2020-08-29 发布日期:2020-08-28
通讯作者: 杨丽媛 E-mail:yangliyuanxueyi@163.com

Comparison of the effects of two methods for the treatment of moderate to severe dental fluorosis.

Received:2020-01-13 Revised:2020-03-04 Online:2020-08-29 Published:2020-08-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评价皓齿微研磨结合两种皓齿美白药物对于氟斑牙着色斑的治疗效果。方法选取20名氟斑牙患者，随机分为A、B两组（n=10），A组纳入牙齿148颗着色氟斑牙，B组纳入牙齿146颗，纳入的牙齿根据着色深浅参照CMYK比色数值将患牙分为轻度、中度和重度着色三个等级。A组使用皓齿微研磨+ Opalescence Boost诊室美白一次，B组使用皓齿微研磨+Opalescence家庭美白一疗程，分别评估其美白效果，术后即刻及术后1周时的牙齿敏感程度、敏感持续时间以及患者对治疗效果的满意度。结果治疗后，A、B两组的总有效率分别为为88.5%和95.2%，二者之间有显著统计学差异（P=0.026<0.05）。美白后即刻，A组无敏感1例，轻度敏感2例，中度敏感2例，重度敏感5例；B组无敏感3例，轻度敏感6例、中度敏感1例；两组敏感度之间有统计学差异（P=0.037<0.05）。美白后1周A组8例无敏感，2例轻度敏感；B组7例无敏感，3例轻度敏感；两组敏感度之间无显著差异（P=0.500>0.05）。A组平均敏感时间为（3.80±2.440）d，B组为（4.60±3.718）d，两组之间无统计学差异（P=0.576>0.05）。A组患者的治疗满意度为3.00±0.816，B组为3.40±0.516，两者之间无统计学差异（P=0.207>0.05）。结论综合考虑两种方法的优缺点，推荐采用微研磨+家庭美白治疗氟斑牙着色斑。

关键词: 氟斑牙, 微研磨, 美白

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects of two methods for the treatment of stains caused by dental fluorosis. Methods Twenty patients with dental fluorosis were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Ten patients in group A included 148 teeth, and 10 patients in group B included 146 teeth. The included teeth were classified as light, moderate or severe according to the CMYK colorimetric value. Teeth in group A used Opalustre microgrinding combined with Opalescence Boost clinic whitening, and teeth in group B used Opalustre microgrinding combined with Opalescence family whitening. Their whitening effects, the sensitivity, the sensitive duration and the patient's satisfaction level immediately and one week after the surgery were evaluated. Results After treatment, the total effective rate of group A was 88.5%, and that of group B was 95.2%, with significant statistical difference (P=0.026<0.05). Immediately after surgery, 1 case in group A was not sensitive, 2 cases were mildly sensitive, 2 cases were moderately sensitive, and 5 were severely sensitive. In group B, 3 cases had no sensitivity, 6 cases were mildly sensitive, and 1 case was moderately sensitive. There was a statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.037<0.05). One week after treatment, 8 patients in group A were non-sensitive, 2 patients were slightly sensitive. 7 patients in group B were non-sensitive, and 3 patients were slightly sensitive. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.500>0.05). The average sensitivity time of group A was 3.80±2.440 days, and that of group B was 4.60±3.718 days. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.576>0.05). The average satisfaction of group A was 3.00±0.816, and that of group B was 3.40±0.516 with no significant difference between the two (P=0.207>0.05). Conclusion Considering the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods, it is recommended to use microgrinding and family whitening to treat stains of dental fluorosis.

Key words: Dental Fluorosis, Microgrinding, Whitening

杨丽媛刘冠邑赵凌. 两种牙齿美白方法治疗中重度氟斑牙的临床效果对比[J]. 口腔医学, 2020, 40(8): 723-727.

参考文献 15

[1]	王嘉德，高学军. 牙体牙髓病学[M].第1版.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2006: 177- 178.
[2]	王天,李桂红.皓齿微研磨糊剂联合美白系统漂白氟斑牙临床效果分析[J].中国美容医学, 2016,25(10):63-66.
[3]	刘娜, 韩晓兰, 陈志方, 赵君. 美白联合渗透树脂微创治疗氟斑牙的疗效观察[J].中国地方病防治杂志，2018，33 (4): 468-469.
[4]	孙文静,冯塽堉,张慧,等. 2种漂白方案对着色型氟斑牙的祛色效果评价[J].上海口腔医学，2018，27（2）：195-199.
[5]	王爽,谷旭,程梁,等．VivaSens脱敏剂在牙齿冷光美白术中预防牙本质敏感的应用及效果评价[J].吉林大学学报:医学版,2014,40(1):170-174.
[6]	师苏萌, 刁健, 鲁莉. Beyond 冷光美白技术治疗变色牙的临床疗效观察[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2015, 16(3): 156-159.
[7]	郭杞,杨爱华,李颖,等.Carisolv伢典微创去腐与牙钻去腐在儿童龋病治疗中的临床效果观察[J].护士进修杂志, 2018,33(24):61-63.
[8]	陈晖,张英.氟斑牙临床有效治疗方法的探讨[J].中国医科大学学报, 2015, 44(8): 746-748.
[9]	宗丽,赵克. 两种牙漂白方案的临床评价[J].口腔疾病防治, 2018,2(7) :104-108．
[10]	赵奇, 王君香, 冯朝华. 冷光牙齿漂白技术对活髓牙牙髓影响的病理观察[J].中华口腔医学杂志, 2007,12(5): 718-719．
[11]	王连方. 氟斑牙的几种“Dean氏分类法浅析”[J].地方病通报，2007，22（1）：71-73.
[12]	陈晖, 康媛媛, 张英. Beyond冷光美白结合祛氟剂治疗氟斑牙的临床疗效[J].中国实用口腔科杂志，2009,2(1):39-41.
[13]	Ardu S,Benbachir N,Stavridakis M,et al.A combined chemomechanical approach for aesthetic management of superficial enamel defects[J]. Br Dent J,2009, 206(4): 205-210.
[14]	张丽,黄莎,杨德圣,等. 三种牙齿漂白方案的短期效果比较研究[J]. 中华老年口腔医学杂志,2011,9(1): 18- 20.
[15]	Alqahtani M Q. Tooth - bleaching procedures and their controversial effects: A literature review [J]. The Saudi Dental Journal,2014,26(2): 33- 46.