›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 237-241.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

骨性Ⅱ类面型患者的性别对软组织侧貌评价的影响

刘晓林1,许衍2,宋志芸3,吴嵩4,陈文静5   

  1. 1. 南京医科大学口腔疾病研究江苏省重点实验室,南京医科大学附属口腔医院正畸科
    2. 上海市口腔病防治院. 上海市口腔医院
    3. 苏州口腔医院
    4. 南京医科大学附属口腔医院
    5. 江苏省口腔医院
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-27 修回日期:2020-09-30 出版日期:2021-03-28 发布日期:2021-03-28
  • 通讯作者: 陈文静 E-mail:chenwenjing_orth@163.com

Effect of sex on evaluation of soft tissue profile in patients with Skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion

  • Received:2020-07-27 Revised:2020-09-30 Online:2021-03-28 Published:2021-03-28

摘要: 目的 研究正畸治疗中骨性Ⅱ类面型患者的性别对软组织侧貌评价的影响。方法 选取南京医科大学附属口腔医院2016—2020年所收治的正畸骨性Ⅱ类面型患者30例,男性15例,女性15例,年龄18~36岁。收集每位患者矫治前自然头位的剪影照片并拍摄CBCT。应用Photoshop软件对30张照片进行修改,隐藏暴露性别特征的头发、睫毛、喉结等特征,获得去除性别特征的剪影照片;将CBCT合成的头颅侧位片与自然头位剪影照片重叠获得自然头位的头颅侧位片。将30张去除性别特征的剪影照片和30张未去除性别特征的剪影照片(标明性别)随机打乱,分别制作成幻灯片,间隔5 s自动播放。邀请非专业人员对两组幻灯片分别进行打分。收集整理数据将去除性别特征组分为高分组与低分组,使用Holdaway分析法定点测量各项指标,独立样本t检验比较各指标间差异。结果 去除性别特征组整体平均分、男性组平均分、女性组平均分均较未去除性别特征组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。去除性别特征组中,男性所得评分明显高于女性(P<0.05)。高、低分组与评分相关的测量指标为A点凸度、上唇基部厚度、颏唇沟深度和颏部厚度(P<0.05)。结论 骨性Ⅱ类面型患者的性别对软组织侧貌的评价存在影响,男性去掉性别特征的侧貌轮廓较女性更易被普通人群接受。影响侧貌评价的美学指标为A点凸度、上唇基部厚度、颏唇沟深度、颏部厚度。

关键词: 软组织侧貌评价, 性别, 骨性Ⅱ类错, Holdaway分析法

Abstract: Objective to study the influence of gender on the evaluation of soft tissue profile in patients with skeletal Class II facial pattern. Methods from 2016 to 2020, 30 patients with skeletal Class II facial pattern in Jiangsu stomatological hospital were selected: 15 males and 15 females, aged 18-36 years. The natural head position silhouette photos of each patient before treatment were collected and CBCT was taken. Photoshop software was used to modify 30 photos to hide the hair, eyelashes, laryngeal nodes and other features that revealed gender characteristics. The same software was used to overlap CBCT synthetic lateral cephalograms with natural head position silhouettes to obtain lateral cephalograms with natural head positions. 30 silhouette photos without gender features and 30 silhouette photos without gender features (indicating gender) were randomly scrambled and made into slides, which were automatically played every 5 seconds. Invite non professionals to rate the two groups of slides respectively. The data were collected and sorted out, and the gender characteristic groups were divided into high group and low group. The holdaway analysis method was used to measure the indicators, and the independent sample t test was used to compare the differences among the indicators. Results the overall average score of the group without gender characteristics was lower than that of the group without gender characteristics (P < 0.05). The average score of male without gender characteristics group was lower than that of male without gender characteristics group (P < 0.05). The average score of women without gender characteristics group was lower than that of women without gender characteristics group (P < 0.05). In the group without gender characteristics, the score of male was higher than that of female (P < 0.05). The high score group and low score related measurement indicators were A-point convexity, upper lip base thickness, mentolabial groove depth, chin thickness (P < 0.05). Conclusion the gender of patients with skeletal Class II facial pattern has an impact on the evaluation of soft tissue profile. The aesthetic indexes affecting the evaluation of facial profile are A-point convexity, upper lip base thickness, mentolabial groove depth and chin thickness. 

Key words: Soft tissue profile evaluation, Gender, Skeletal Class II malocclusion