[1]王群勇,赵玮.美貌与权利——来自中国家庭的微观证据[J].南开经济研究,2019(06):181-198+218.[2]赵震锦,王丽萍,郑雪松,赵瑞,刘帅.侧貌美观评价的影响因素[J].中国医科大学学报,2017,46(06):540-543+547.[3]Wang J, Zhao X, Mi C, Raza I. The study on facial soft tissue thickness using Han population in Xinjiang.?Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266:585.e1–585.e5. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.032[4]顾田. 美貌人群软组织侧貌审美差异研究[D].天津医科大学,2018.[5]Tole N, Lajnert V, Kovacevic Pavicic D, Spalj S. Gender, age, and psychosocial context of the perception of facial esthetics.?J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26(2):119–130. doi:10.1111/jerd.12064[6]王芬芬,朱金晓,张定铭,邓锋,何昌平.唇突度的变化对侧貌美观的审美评价[J].口腔医学,2019,39(12):1118-1122.[7]Pithon MM, Silva IS, Almeida IO, et al. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators.?Angle Orthod. 2014;84(2):231–238. doi:10.2319/051513-373.1[8]Hockley A, Weinstein M, Borislow AJ, Braitman LE. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of African American profile esthetics.?Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141(2):161–168. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.041[9]Davidenko N. Silhouetted face profiles: a new methodology for face perception research.?J Vis. 2007;7(4):6. Published 2007 Mar 21. doi:10.1167/7.4.6[10]杨振锟. 鼻部形态与颌骨结构关系的研究[D].第四军医大学,2016.[11]刘畅,李新青,刘莹,郭小凯,王思涵,王硕,杨家瑞.中国北方正常年轻成人自然头位下软组织侧貌的线性测量和分析[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2016,42(01):109-114.[12]周珅玥,欧平花,余明珠,郭新程,邵春生,何黎明,苏花.湖南汉族正常成人面部软组织侧貌头影测量分析[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2015,40(04):398-405.[13]杨岱威,黄克强,李春山,李志刚,韩亮.辽宁地区正常牙合汉族大学生颌面部软组织侧貌头影测量研究[J].中国医学工程,2011,19(05):122-123.[14]温兴涛,李晓智,丁建锋,林华荣.重庆地区正常成人颅颌面结构的头影测量分析[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2008(01):38-41.[15]Hamid S, Abuaffan AH. Facial soft tissue thickness in a sample of Sudanese adults with different occlusions.?Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266:209–214. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.05.018[16]Jeelani W, Fida M, Shaikh A. Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Among Three Skeletal Classes in Adult Pakistani Subjects.?J Forensic Sci. 2015;60(6):1420–1425. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12851[17]关慧娟,王青青,曹正飞,冯翠娟.中国正常(牙合)人群面部软组织侧貌性别差异的Meta分析[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2019,12(05):279-284+290.[18]Fudalej SA, Desmedt D, Bronkhorst E, Fudalej PS. Comparison of Three Methods of Rating Nasolabial Appearance in Cleft Lip and Palate.?Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(4):400–407. doi:10.1597/14-189[19]赵茜,赵东方,李冰洁,吕蕾.量表的选项顺序效应及其影响因素分析——以教育领域的李克特量表为例[J].中国考试,2020(04):22-27.[20]陈聪,李青奕.颌面部软组织美学分析方法的研究进展[J].口腔医学,2017,37(12):1148-1152.[21]封景,徐宇红,张宇.面下1/3侧貌主观评价方法及其影响因素的研究进展[J].医学综述,2019,25(09):1794-1798.[22]Geraldo Marchiori,Leonardo Sodré,Tereza da Cunha,Fernando Torres,Henrique Rosário,Luiz Paranhos. Pleasantness of facial profile and its correlation with soft tissue cephalometric parameters: Perception of orthodontists and lay people[J]. European Journal of Dentistry,2015,9(3).[23]Fudalej SA, Desmedt D, Bronkhorst E, Fudalej PS. Comparison of Three Methods of Rating Nasolabial Appearance in Cleft Lip and Palate.?Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(4):400–407. doi:10.1597/14-189[24]Wahn B, K?nig P. Is Attentional Resource Allocation Across Sensory Modalities Task-Dependent?.?Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017;13(1):83‐96. Published 2017 Mar 31. doi:10.5709/acp-0209-2[25]胡晶晶,徐昊骙,曹立人.感觉记忆中含语义对象的视觉表征[J].心理学报,2019,51(9):982-991. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00982. |