不同矢状骨面型成年患者磨牙后三角及下颌升支前缘骨骼特征的CBCT分析

›› 2021, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 509-513.

不同矢状骨面型成年患者磨牙后三角及下颌升支前缘骨骼特征的CBCT分析

叶俊杰,张卫兵

南京医科大学附属口腔医院

收稿日期:2021-01-26 修回日期:2021-03-08 出版日期:2021-06-28 发布日期:2021-06-25
通讯作者: 张卫兵 E-mail:zhangweibing@njmu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金;科教强卫口腔正畸;江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目

CBCT analysis of bone characteristics of mandibular retromolar trigone and anterior ramus region in adult with different sagittal skeletal patterns

Jun-Jie YE¹,

Received:2021-01-26 Revised:2021-03-08 Online:2021-06-28 Published:2021-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的　通过CBCT评估不同矢状骨面型成年患者磨牙后三角及下颌升支前缘骨骼特征，并分析微种植体的植入风险。方法　选取016—00年就诊于南京医科大学附属口腔医院正畸科的150例成年患者，按照矢状骨面型分为三类。在矢状面上高于??平面 mm及4 mm处绘制与??平面平行和成45°的参考线，测量参考线上的有效骨量和骨皮质厚度。结果　所有测量的植入部位平均有效骨量超过10 mm，平均骨皮质厚度1.7~.4 mm；与??平面平行处测得的有效骨量和骨皮质厚度的平均值大于与??平面成45°处测得的有效骨量和骨皮质厚度的平均值，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）；骨性Ⅲ类患者有效骨量最小，骨性Ⅱ患者有效骨量最大，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论　不同矢状骨面型成年患者磨牙后三角及下颌升支前缘具有足够的有效骨量和骨皮质厚度，可以安全地植入微种植体。

关键词: 矢状骨面型, 微种植体, 骨骼特征, 锥体束CT

Abstract: Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate bone characteristics of the mandibular retromolar trigone and anterior ramus region to evaluate the risks for miniscrew insertion in in adult with different sagittal skeletal patterns. Methods The sample consisted of 150 adult patients with different sagittal skeletal patterns who visited Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from 2016 to 2020. On sagittal scan views, bone depth and cortical bone thickness were evaluated on specific lines parallel and at a 45° angle to the occlusal plane, and at 2 mm and at 4 mm distance from it. Results All of the considered insertion sites showed on average more than 10 mm of bone depth. Cortical bone thickness showed average values from 1.7 mm to 2.4 mm. Inferential statistics showed significantly (P <0.05) greater bone depth and cortical bone thickness in cross-sectional scans parallel to the occlusal plane compared with those at a 45° angle to it. The Class Ⅱ patients have the smallest bone depth while the Class Ⅰ have the biggest(p<0.05). Conclusion The retromolar trigone and anterior ramus region showed enough bone depth and cortical bone thickness for safe miniscrew insertion in adult with different sagittal skeletal patterns

Key words: sagittal skeletal patterns, miniscrew, bone characteristics, CBCT

中图分类号:

R783.5

叶俊杰张卫兵. 不同矢状骨面型成年患者磨牙后三角及下颌升支前缘骨骼特征的CBCT分析[J]. 口腔医学, 2021, 41(6): 509-513.

Jun-Jie YE. CBCT analysis of bone characteristics of mandibular retromolar trigone and anterior ramus region in adult with different sagittal skeletal patterns[J]. Stomatology, 2021, 41(6): 509-513.

参考文献 22

[1]	CRISMANI A G, BERTL M H, CELAR A G, et al.Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: Review and analysis of published clinical trials[J].Am J Orthod Dentofac, 2010, 137(1):108-13
[2]	ALHARBI F, ALMUZIAN M, BEARN D.Miniscrews failure rate in orthodontics: systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Eur J Orthodont, 2018, 40(5):519-30
[3]	SCHATZLE M, MANNCHEN R, ZWAHLEN M, et al.Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review[J].Clin Oral Implan Res, 2009, 20(12):1351-9
[4]	MUDDUGANGADHAR B C, AMARNATH G S, SONIKA R, et al.Meta-analysis of Failure and Survival Rate of Implant-supported Single Crowns,Fixed Partial Denture,and Implant Tooth-supported Prostheses[J].J Int Oral Health, 2015, 7(9):11-7
[5]	NUCERA R, LO GIUDICE A, BELLOCCHIO A M, et al.Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults[J].Angle Orthod, 2017, 87(5):745-51
[6]	BAUMGAERTEL S, HANS M G.Assessment of infrazygomatic bone depth for mini-screw insertion[J].Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009, 20(6):638-42
[7]	BAUMGAERTEL S, TRAN T T.Buccal mini-implant site selection: the mucosal fallacy and zones of opportunity[J].J Clin Orthod, 2012, 46(7):434-6
[8]	ALKAN O, KAYA Y.The thickness of posterior buccal attached gingiva at common miniscrew insertion sites in subjects with different facial types[J].Am J Orthod Dentofac, 2019, 156(6):800-7
[9]	HADDAD R, SAADEH M.Distance to alveolar crestal bone: a critical factor in the success of orthodontic mini-implants [J]. Prog Orthod, 2019, 20[J].Progress in Orthodontics, 2019, 20(1):-
[10]	张倩倩，侯凤春，于艳玲.微种植体植入颧牙槽嵴区域的风险分析 [J].中华口腔正畸学杂志, 2018, 1(1):8-11
[11]	BECHTOLD T E, PARK Y C, KIM K H, et al.Long-term stability of miniscrew anchored maxillary molar distalization in Class II treatment[J].Angle Orthodontist, 2020, 90(3):362-8
[12]	JANG W, SHIN C, HWANG S, et al.Nonsurgical treatment of an adult with a skeletal Class III malocclusion combined with a functional anterior shift,severely overclosed vertical dimension,and a reverse smile[J].Am J Orthod Dentofac, 2020, 157(4):561-70
[13]	ANHOURY P S.Retromolar miniscrew implants for Class III camouflage treatment[J].J Clin Orthod, 2013, 47(12):706-15
[14]	LIU H, WU X, TAN J, et al.Safe regions of miniscrew implantation for distalization of mandibular dentition with CBCT[J].Prog Orthod, 2019, 20(1):45-
[15]	DE VOS W, CASSELMAN J, SWENNEN G R.Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 38(6):609-25
[16]	NUCERA R, BELLOCCHIO A M, OTERI G, et al.Bone and cortical bone characteristics of mandibular retromolar trigone and anterior ramus region for miniscrew insertion in adults[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2019, 155(3):330-8
[17]	CHANG C H, LIN J S, ROBERTS W E.Ramus screws: the ultimate solution for lower impacted molars[J].Semin Orthod, 2018, 24(1):135-54
[18]	CHANG C, LIU S S, ROBERTS W E.Primary failure rate for 1680 extra-alveolar mandibular buccal shelf mini-screws placed in movable mucosa or attached gingiva[J].Angle Orthod, 2015, 85(6):905-10
[19]	MIGLIORATI M, BENEDICENTI S, SIGNORI A, et al.Miniscrew design and bone characteristics: An experimental study of primary stability[J].Am J Orthod Dentofac, 2012, 142(2):228-34
[20]	MARQUEZAN M, SOUZA M M, ARAUJO M T, et al.Is miniscrew primary stability influenced by bone density?[J].Braz Oral Res, 2011, 25(5):427-32
[21]	MOTOYOSHI M, HIRABAYASHI M, UEMURA M, et al.Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant[J].Clin Oral Implan Res, 2006, 17(1):109-14
[22]	URE D S, OLIVER D R, KIM K B, et al.Stability changes of miniscrew implants over time[J].Angle Orthod, 2011, 81(6):994-1000