义齿软衬材料抗菌改性的研究进展

doi:10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2022.08.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 义齿软衬材料是一种树脂基或硅基弹性衬垫,可以帮助均匀分配咬合载荷,减轻局部过大应力,提高患者舒适度,常用于活动义齿修复。然而,软衬材料自身表面结构和性能易导致微生物的黏附定植,尤其是白念珠菌,进而引发义齿性口炎。因此,软衬材料的抗菌改性可以大大提高其临床使用价值。目前主要措施有添加抗菌填料(如传统抗菌药物、天然提取物、无机金属抗菌剂),光动力抗菌化疗,低温等离子体表面处理等。该文概述了目前义齿软衬材料抗菌改性的主要措施和研究进展,探讨了其抗菌机制和对材料理化性能的影响。

关键词: 软衬材料, 义齿性口炎, 抗菌性能

Abstract: Denture soft lining material is a kind of resin-based or silicon-based elastic liner, which can help the uniform distribution of occlusal load, reduce local excessive stress and improve patients′ comfort level. It is often used in removable denture restoration. However, the surface structure and properties of soft lining materials can easily lead to microbial adhesion and colonization, especially Candida albicans, which can lead to denture stomatitis. Therefore, the antibacterial modification of soft lining material can greatly improve its clinical application value. At present, main measures include adding antibacterial fillers, such as traditional antimicrobial agents, natural extracts, inorganic metal antimicrobial agents, photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy, protective non-thermal plasma treatments and so on. In this paper, main measures and progress of research on antibacterial modification of denture soft lining materials were summarized, and its antibacterial mechanism and effect on the physical and chemical properties of materials were discussed.

Key words: soft lining material, denture stomatitis, antibacterial properties

中图分类号:

R783.1

朱炳震, 李碧榕, 苏屹坤, 伍韩雪, 王景云. 义齿软衬材料抗菌改性的研究进展[J]. 口腔医学, 2022, 42(8): 759-763.

ZHU Bingzhen, LI Birong, SU Yikun, WU Hanxue, WANG Jingyun. Progress of research on antibacterial modification of denture soft lining material[J]. Stomatology, 2022, 42(8): 759-763.

参考文献

[1] Deng J, Ren LY, Pan YH, et al. Antifungal property of acrylic denture soft liner containing silver nanoparticles synthesized in situ[J]. J Dent, 2021, 106:103589.
[2] SÁnchez-Aliaga A, Farago PV, MichÉl MD, et al. Surface morphology and in vitro leachability of soft liners modified by the incorporation of antifungals for denture stomatitis treatment[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2021, 28:e20200639.
[3] Jabłońska-Stencel E, Pakieła W, Mertas A, et al. Effect of silver-emitting filler on antimicrobial and mechanical properties of soft denture lining material[J]. Materials (Basel), 2018, 11(2):E318.
[4] Onuma H, Inokoshi M, Hirayama D, et al. Stress distribution analysis of oral mucosa under soft denture liners using smoothed particle hydrodynamics method[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2021, 117:104390.
[5] Morse DJ, Smith A, Wilson MJ, et al. Molecular community profiling of the bacterial microbiota associated with denture-related stomatitis[J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1):10228.
[6] Neppelenbroek KH. The importance of daily removal of the denture biofilm for oral and systemic diseases prevention[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2015, 23(6):547-548.
[7] Ansarifard E, Zareshahrabadi Z, Sarafraz N, et al. Evaluation of antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of copper oxide nanoparticles within soft denture liners against oral pathogens[J]. Bioinorg Chem Appl, 2021, 2021:9939275.
[8] Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Bürgers R, et al. Candida albicans biofilm formation on soft denture liners and efficacy of cleaning protocols[J]. Gerodontology, 2012, 29(2):e383-e391.
[9] Altinci P, Mutluay M, Söderling E, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy and mechanical properties of BAC-modified hard and soft denture liners[J]. Odontology, 2018, 106(1):83-89.
[10] Maluf CV, Janott-Sarlo CA, Bertolini MM, et al. In vitro evaluation of physicochemical properties of soft lining resins after incorporation of chlorhexidine[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020, 124(5):615.e1-615.e7.
[11] Iqbal Z, Zafar MS. Role of antifungal medicaments added to tissue conditioners:A systematic review[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2016, 60(4):231-239.
[12] Bueno MG, Sousa EJB, Hotta J, et al. Surface properties of temporary soft liners modified by minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungals[J]. Braz Dent J, 2017, 28(2):158-164.
[13] Bueno M, Urban V, Barbério G, et al. Effect of antimicrobial agents incorporated into resilient denture relines on the Candida albicans biofilm[J]. Oral Dis, 2015, 21(1):57-65.
[14] Neppelenbroek KH, Lima JFM, Hotta J, et al. Effect of incorporation of antifungal agents on the ultimate tensile strength of temporary soft denture liners[J]. J Prosthodont, 2018, 27(2):177-181.
[15] Lima JF, Maciel JG, Hotta J, et al. Porosity of temporary denture soft liners containing antifungal agents[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2016, 24(5):453-461.
[16] Campos KPL, Viana GM, Cabral LM, et al. Self-cured resin modified by quaternary ammonium methacrylates and chlorhexidine:Cytotoxicity, antimicrobial, physical, and mechanical properties[J]. Dent Mater, 2020, 36(1):68-75.
[17] Albrecht N, da Silva Fidalgo TK, de Alencar MJS, et al. Peel bond strength and antifungal activity of two soft denture lining materials incorporated with 1% chlorhexidine diacetate[J]. Dent Mater J, 2018, 37(5):725-733.
[18] Sterzenbach T, Helbig R, Hannig C, et al. Bioadhesion in the oral cavity and approaches for biofilm management by surface modifications[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2020, 24(12):4237-4260.
[19] Wang J, Dong X, Yu Q, et al. Incorporation of antibacterial agent derived deep eutectic solvent into an active dental composite[J]. Dent Mater, 2017, 33(12):1445-1455.
[20] Muttagi S, Subramanya JK. Effect of incorporating seed oils on the antifungal property, surface roughness, wettability, weight change, and glucose sorption of a soft liner[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(1):178-185.
[21] Herla M, Boening K, Meissner H, et al. Mechanical and surface properties of resilient denture liners modified with chitosan salts[J]. Materials (Basel), 2019, 12(21):E3518.
[22] Aref NS. An in vitro assessment of surface roughness, tensile bond strength and antifungal activity of grape seed extract-modified soft liner[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2020, 21(4):353-358.
[23] Baygar T, Ugur A, Sarac N, et al. Functional denture soft liner with antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties[J]. J Dent Sci, 2018, 13(3):213-219.
[24] Junior TK, de Moura C, do Carmo MAV, et al. Chemical composition, antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic/cytoprotective activity of non-polar extracts of grape (Vitis labrusca cv. Bordeaux) and blackberry (Rubus fruticosus) seeds[J]. Molecules, 2021, 26(13):4057.
[25] Saeed A, Haider A, Zahid S, et al. In-vitro antifungal efficacy of tissue conditioner-chitosan composites as potential treatment therapy for denture stomatitis[J]. Int J Biol Macromol, 2019, 125:761-766.
[26] Verlee A, Mincke S, Stevens CV. Recent developments in antibacterial and antifungal chitosan and its derivatives[J]. Carbohydr Polym, 2017, 164:268-283.
[27] Makvandi P, Gu JT, Zare EN, et al. Polymeric and inorganic nanoscopical antimicrobial fillers in dentistry[J]. Acta Biomater, 2020, 101:69-101.
[28] de Oliveira RC, de Foggi CC, Teixeira MM, et al. Mechanism of antibacterial activity via morphology change of α-AgVO₃:Theoretical and experimental insights[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017, 9(13):11472-11481.
[29] Durán N, Durán M, de Jesus MB, et al. Silver nanoparticles:A new view on mechanistic aspects on antimicrobial activity[J]. Nanomedicine, 2016, 12(3):789-799.
[30] Kreve S, Oliveira VC, Bachmann L, et al. Influence of AgVO₃ incorporation on antimicrobial properties, hardness, roughness and adhesion of a soft denture liner[J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9:11889.
[31] Chladek G, Mertas A, Barszczewska-Rybarek I, et al. Antifungal activity of denture soft lining material modified by silver nanoparticles-a pilot study[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2011, 12(7):4735-4744.
[32] Giroldo LM, Felipe MP, de Oliveira MA, et al. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT) with methylene blue increases membrane permeability in Candida albicans[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2009, 24(1):109-112.
[33] Al-Kheraif AA, Khan AA, AlMufareh NA, et al. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy through photosensitizers loaded poly-l-glycolic acid on Candida albicans in denture lining material:Release, biological and hardness study[J]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2021, 33:102134.
[34] Goiato MC, Silva EVFD, Medeiros RA, et al. Effect of nonthermal plasma on the properties of a resinous liner submitted to aging[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018, 119(3):397-403.
[35] Souza JGS, Bertolini M, Costa RC, et al. Targeting pathogenic biofilms: Newly developed superhydrophobic coating favors a host-compatible microbial profile on the titanium surface[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12(9):10118-10129.
[36] Nagay BE, Bitencourt SB, Commar BC, et al. Antimicrobial and protective effects of non-thermal plasma treatments on the performance of a resinous liner[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2020, 117:104822.