喷砂对不同树脂与纯钛粘结抗剪强度及粘结耐久力的影响

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of sandblasting on the shear bond strength and durability of three resin cements bonded to titanium. Methods Titanium in two sizes (φ5 mm×5 mm, φ4 mm×2 mm) were fabricated with titanium casting technology for dentistry, each size consisted of 96 specimens, and the two sizes were paired up to 96 pairs. The paired specimens were divided into the experiment group and the control group. The experiment group was sandblasted with 50 μm Al2O3 particle，the control group was untreated. The paired titanium specimens were bonded by Super-Bond C&B (SB), Panavia F (PF) and Rely X Unicem (RU), according to manufacturer’s recommendations. The specimens were divided into 6 groups (SB sandblasted, SB un-sandblasted, PF sandblasted, PF un-sandblasted, RU sandblasted, RU un-sandblasted), each of which consisted of 16 pairs of specimens. 8 pairs of each group were immersed in water bath at 37 ℃ for 24 hours, the other 8 pairs were treated with 5 000 cycles of thermocycling after being immersed in water at 37 ℃ for 24 hours. The shear bond strength was evaluated by the MTS testing machine. The values of each group were compared by two- factor ANOVA with interaction analysis. Results Before thermocycling, the shear bond strength of RU un-sandblasted group was the lowest, and the highest results were obtained in SB sandblasted group (28.03±8.40) MPa. After thermocycling, the highest strengths were obtained in PF sandblasted group (27.12±8.68) MPa, and the lowest results were obtained in RU un-sandblasted group. Before thermocycling, the shear bond strengths of SB sandblasted and SB un-sandblasted groups were statistically different (P＜0.05), which was also true for RU sandblasted and RU un-sandblasted groups. After thermocycling, the results of RU sandblasted and RU un-sandblasted were still different (P＜0.05). Thermocycling statistically affected the shear bond strengths in SB sandblasted and SB un-sandblasted groups (P＜0.05). Other results were not statistically different (P＞0.05). Conclusion Sandblasting can significantly increase the shear bond strength and durability of SB and RU bonded to titanium, but it isn’t positively correlated with the shear bond strength and durability of all resin cements bonded to titanium.

Key words: [keywords] sandblasting , resin cement, casting pure titanium, shear bond strength, thermocycling

CLC Number:

R783.2

References

[1]Wu JC,Lai LC,Sheets CG,et al.A comparison of the marginal adaptation of cathode-arc vapor-deposited titanium and cast base metal copings[J].J Prosthet Dent,2011,105(6):403-409
[2]Wadhwani C,Chung K H.Bond strength and interactions of machined titanium-based alloy with dental cements[J].J Prosthet Dent,2015,114(5):660-665
[3]Di Francescantonio M,Oliveira MTD,Daroz LGD,et al.Adhesive bonding of resin cements to cast titanium with adhesive primers[J].Braz Dent J,2012,23(3):218-222
[4]Egoshi T,Taira Y,Soeno K,Sawase T.Effects of sandblasting,H 2 SO 4/HCl etching,and phosphate primer application on bond strength of veneering resin composite to commercially pure titanium grade 4[J].Dent Mater J,2013,32(2):219-227
[5]Lung CYK,Liu D,Matinlinna JP.Surface treatment of titanium by a polydimethylsiloxane coating on bond strength of resin to titanium[J].J Mech Behav Biomed Mater,2015,41:168-176
[6]Kokubo T,Yamaguchi S.Suppl 1-M2: Bioactive Titanate Layers Formed on Titanium and Its Alloys by Simple Chemical and Heat Treatments[J].Open Biomed Eng J,2015,9:29-41
[7]de Oliveira Abi-Rached F,Fonseca RG,Haneda IG,et al.The effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements to titanium[J].J Prosthet Dent,2012,108(6):370-376
[8]Fujishima A,Fujishima Y,Ferracane JL.Shear bond strength of four commercial bonding systems to cpTi[J].Dent Mater,1995,11(2):82-86
[9]Seker E,Kilicarslan MA,Deniz ST,et al.Effect of atmospheric plasma versus conventional surface treatments on the adhesion capability between self-adhesive resin cement and titanium surface[J].J Adv Prosthodont,2015,7(3):249-256
[10]Ho BJ,Tsoi JK-H,Liu D,et al.Effects of sandblasting distance and angles on resin cement bonding to zirconia and titanium[J].Int J Adhes Adhes,2015,62:25-31
[11]Hosoya Y,Tay FR,Miyakoshi S,et al.Hardness and elasticity of caries-affected and sound primary tooth dentin bonded with 4-META one-step self-etch adhesives[J].Am J Dent,2008,21(4):223-
[12]Reich S M,Wichmann M,Frankenberger R,et al.Effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of three resin cements to a machinable feldspatic ceramic[J].J Biomed Mater Res B,2005,74(2):740-746
[13]Hanawa T,Kaga M,Itoh Y,et al.Cytotoxicities of oxides,phosphates and sulphides of metals[J].Biomaterials,1992,13(1):20-24
[14]Yanagida H,Matsumura H,Taira Y,et al.Adhesive bonding of composite material to cast titanium with varying surface preparations[J].J Oral Rehabil,2002,29(2):121-126
[15]Azillah M,Anstice H,Pearson G.Long-term flexural strength of three direct aesthetic restorative materials[J].J Dent,1998,26(2):177-182
[16]Wegner SM,Gerdes W,Kern M.Effect of different artificial aging conditions on ceramic-composite bond strength[J].Int J Prosthodont,2001,15(3):267-272

Effect of sandblasting on the shear bond strength and durability of three resin cements bonded to titanium

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	. Durability evaluation of bonding between one type of self-adhesive resin cement and zirconia ceramics [J]. , 2019, 39(5): 390-394.
[2]	. Effects of smear layer by different burs on the bonding strength of dentin and self-adhesive resin cement [J]. , 2019, 39(5): 423-426.
[3]	. Influence of deproteinization of sodium hypochlorite on shear bond strength of enamel：a meta-analysis [J]. , 2018, 35(9): 819-823.
[4]	. Study on the adhesive properties and antibacterial properties of DMAE-CB and NACP modified dentin adhesives [J]. , 2018, 38(3): 227-229.
[5]	Ya-Bo CAO Lu FU Xu-Rong SUN. Influence of shear bond strength of rebonded metal brackets treated with three different methods [J]. , 2018, 38(3): 230-233.
[6]	Fang-Fang SUN. Cytotoxic effects of two self-adhesive resin cements under different curing modes in vitro [J]. , 2017, 37(11): 981-985.
[7]	. Effect of various conditions of sandblasting on shear bond strength between zirconia and indirect composite resin [J]. , 2016, 36(9): 801-805.
[8]	. The effect of zinc oxide eugenol cement on the shear bond strength of three permanent cements [J]. , 2016, 36(3): 206-209.
[9]	. The vitro study of the influence of different silane coupling agents and adhesive materials on shear bond strength of metal brackets to porcelain surface [J]. , 2016, 36(2): 116-119.
[10]	. Effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation on dentin bonding strength [J]. , 2016, 36(11): 989-992.
[11]	. Effect of different intensity of light source on fiber post cementation [J]. , 2015, 35(9): 730-733.
[12]	. Effect of H2O2 surface treatments on the bond strength between fiber posts and resin cement [J]. , 2015, 35(12): 1032-1035.
[13]	. The research progress of adhesive property between laser pretreated dentin and resin cement [J]. , 2015, 35(1): 76-80.
[14]	. The influence of working time on the property of dual-cured resin cement [J]. , 2015, 35(1): 19-23.
[15]	. Effects of different energies of Er: YAG laser pretreatment on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement [J]. , 2014, 34(12): 931-935.